by SCIAG » 12 Aug 2012 16:04
by royalp-we » 12 Aug 2012 16:37
by Ian Royal » 12 Aug 2012 16:40
SCIAG Shite example from Siege, but his point is correct. Lower league strikers did get gambled on in the old First Division, and some went on to be big names. Ian Rush is probably the best example, Kevin Keegan too.
by peterroyal76 » 12 Aug 2012 16:46
RockheadRumplePlatypussTheSiege We should get into this market. The Prem (and the old 1st Div) have lived on strikers pulled from the lower divisions. It's always a question of 'who has the bottle to sign them'. e.g. Absolutely untried striker from the lower divisions - Ian Wright (RFC wouldn't want another him would they?).
Which top flight club took a risk in buying Ian Wright from a lower league team?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think Palace got Wright from a Sunday League team and he proved to be so good Arsenal went on to buy him.
by SCIAG » 12 Aug 2012 17:49
royalp-we Jordan Rhodes could well be the new David Nugent.
Let's be clear here, if a player makes the step up, then great. If its a gamble and no one can be sure they can make the step up, don't spend £6m on them.
Le Fondre, a goalscorer at a lower level for £300k unproven at a high level is my kind of signing.
Rhodes, a goalscorer at a lower level for £6m unproven at a high level, is not.
by Dare to Dr£am » 12 Aug 2012 21:32
IdealTheSiegeIan Royal And Palace were an old Division Two side, or Championship in current money. He then had about 5 or 6 seasons wih Palace before Arsenal took him.
TheSiege showing the massive chips on his shoulders and his total lack of knowledge at the same time.
Sorry not to respond quicker, I've been watching the Olympics. The point I was making was that a huge amount of lower division (including semi-professional and even amateur players) have ended in the top division over the years. I thought Ian Wright was a good example but it depends how you look at it. He was in non-league, was picked up by a lower div team and ended up at Arsenal scoring brilliant goals. There may be better examples and probably are. Other contributers seem to accept the point I was making but, if you want to be pedantic, simply provide a better example - it will still prove my case!
You forget that we have a track record for gambling on those signings, Brett Williams, Karl Sheppard, Adam Le Fondre, etc.
Only one of them came good.
by AJ_urz9 » 12 Aug 2012 22:06
TheSiege You forget that we have a track record for gambling on those signings, Brett Williams, Karl Sheppard, Adam Le Fondre, etc.
Only one of them came good.
And which of those three had scored 40 goals in a season and got their side promoted?
by RoyallyFcuked » 13 Aug 2012 00:56
by Za Vas » 13 Aug 2012 01:12
by Cypry » 13 Aug 2012 15:01
Za Vas Signing a lower league player for peanuts and seeing him come good, i.e. Doyle/Long (alright they were from Ireland, not lower league) in a relatively low risk strategy is nothing like demolishing our record transfer fee for someone without any PL experience. They want silly money for a lad with no proven track record at the highest level, yes gambles should be taken every now and again, but not for 6-8 million or whatever they want for him.
by who are ya? » 13 Aug 2012 15:24
TheSiege Sorry not to respond quicker, I've been watching the Olympics.
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 13 Aug 2012 15:43
CypryZa Vas Signing a lower league player for peanuts and seeing him come good, i.e. Doyle/Long (alright they were from Ireland, not lower league) in a relatively low risk strategy is nothing like demolishing our record transfer fee for someone without any PL experience. They want silly money for a lad with no proven track record at the highest level, yes gambles should be taken every now and again, but not for 6-8 million or whatever they want for him.
^this - you're comparing apples with oranges if you use Long, Doyle or even ALF (who all cost from tens to a few hundred thousand) to justify why we should gamble on Rhodes (for supposedly up to £6M)....
We have a long list of players signed for peanuts, ALF, Long, Doyle, Sheppard, Manset, Williams etc etc - even if 50% come good, that's an affordable risk at the level of spend that we made on those players, but to take a 50/50 gamble with £6M - I'd rather have three £2M players who are comparatively proven for that money....
by Seal » 13 Aug 2012 15:50
by loyalroyal4life » 13 Aug 2012 15:57
by Seal » 13 Aug 2012 16:19
by leww_rfc » 13 Aug 2012 16:32
by Ian Royal » 13 Aug 2012 17:17
by leww_rfc » 13 Aug 2012 17:23
by Girdler_Massive » 13 Aug 2012 17:57
by LightwaterRoyal » 13 Aug 2012 18:00
Seal The more I look at our squad the more I think £6m on Rhodes is a gamble worth taking.
With the money from the new TV deal kicking in next season, this is arguably the most important year in Premier League history to stay up. It can cement us as a top 20 club.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests