CheLOLsea

9628 posts
User avatar
SLAMMED
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7514
Joined: 19 May 2008 16:12
Location: Let's leave before the lights come on

Re: CheLOLsea

by SLAMMED » 25 Apr 2012 22:09

Friday's Legacy
FiNeRaIn shreeves is an idiot http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhinlzXWQqg

should really be made to make an official apology for that, completely needless and stupid even if not intended, whats he's trying to achieve?


totally unacceptable..



:lol:

What a plank.

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16854
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: CheLOLsea

by TBM » 25 Apr 2012 22:52

Victor Meldrew This is more like it.
Two teams intent on playing attacking football as befits two of the biggest clubs in the world with 13 (?) European Cups between them compared with last night where one relatively little club with no wins and only a bit of recent European football pedigree were playing a side right up there with Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.
The little club played it as if they were Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth playing away at Old Trafford hoping to just hang on in there and get a break-hardly the stuff of potential European Champions and the most negative of teams since Red Star Belgrade.
I do think it must be some sort of record for a team to play 2 games,have 3 shots,score 3 goals and get just 2 corners in football generally and there surely can not ever have been such stats for a team reaching a European final.

It would be understandable if this team cost next to nothing as with Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth but when it has cost more to assemble than the opposition then the style of play is almost unforgivable.


Fcuk me, take that Liverpool hat off once in a while - you're worse than Spacey

IT'S BORING!!!

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: CheLOLsea

by Simon's Church » 26 Apr 2012 08:22

Don't worry, I'm sure Carroll will be scoring the goal that confirms Liverpool make the Champions League final soon enough.

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: CheLOLsea

by FiNeRaIn » 26 Apr 2012 09:20

Victor Meldrew This is more like it.
Two teams intent on playing attacking football as befits two of the biggest clubs in the world with 13 (?) European Cups between them compared with last night where one relatively little club with no wins and only a bit of recent European football pedigree were playing a side right up there with Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.
The little club played it as if they were Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth playing away at Old Trafford hoping to just hang on in there and get a break-hardly the stuff of potential European Champions and the most negative of teams since Red Star Belgrade.
I do think it must be some sort of record for a team to play 2 games,have 3 shots,score 3 goals and get just 2 corners in football generally and there surely can not ever have been such stats for a team reaching a European final.

It would be understandable if this team cost next to nothing as with Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth but when it has cost more to assemble than the opposition then the style of play is almost unforgivable.


zzzz boring

Reading played like this against southampton and brighton, in fact we were dominated by whu and forest also albeit to a lesser extent...but this doesn't fit your agenda.

BR2
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2138
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 13:53
Location: Bournemouth & Ringwood

Re: CheLOLsea

by BR2 » 26 Apr 2012 09:23

FiNeRaIn
Victor Meldrew This is more like it.
Two teams intent on playing attacking football as befits two of the biggest clubs in the world with 13 (?) European Cups between them compared with last night where one relatively little club with no wins and only a bit of recent European football pedigree were playing a side right up there with Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.
The little club played it as if they were Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth playing away at Old Trafford hoping to just hang on in there and get a break-hardly the stuff of potential European Champions and the most negative of teams since Red Star Belgrade.
I do think it must be some sort of record for a team to play 2 games,have 3 shots,score 3 goals and get just 2 corners in football generally and there surely can not ever have been such stats for a team reaching a European final.

It would be understandable if this team cost next to nothing as with Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth but when it has cost more to assemble than the opposition then the style of play is almost unforgivable.


zzzz boring

Reading played like this against southampton and brighton, in fact we were dominated by whu and forest also albeit to a lesser extent...but this doesn't fit your agenda.


Reading away at Brighton is hardly a football event to compare with a European Champs league with hundreds of millions watching on TV and expecting to see some classy football.
A poor comparison.l


BR2
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2138
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 13:53
Location: Bournemouth & Ringwood

Re: CheLOLsea

by BR2 » 26 Apr 2012 09:25

TBM
Victor Meldrew This is more like it.
Two teams intent on playing attacking football as befits two of the biggest clubs in the world with 13 (?) European Cups between them compared with last night where one relatively little club with no wins and only a bit of recent European football pedigree were playing a side right up there with Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.
The little club played it as if they were Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth playing away at Old Trafford hoping to just hang on in there and get a break-hardly the stuff of potential European Champions and the most negative of teams since Red Star Belgrade.
I do think it must be some sort of record for a team to play 2 games,have 3 shots,score 3 goals and get just 2 corners in football generally and there surely can not ever have been such stats for a team reaching a European final.

It would be understandable if this team cost next to nothing as with Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth but when it has cost more to assemble than the opposition then the style of play is almost unforgivable.


Fcuk me, take that Liverpool hat off once in a while - you're worse than Spacey

IT'S BORING!!!


WTF has that got to do with the mighty reds? :roll:

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: CheLOLsea

by Extended-Phenotype » 26 Apr 2012 09:27

I think his point is, that it's weird for Chelsea to have adopted a 'little club' personality, considering their team is more expensive than the planets oil reserves.

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: CheLOLsea

by FiNeRaIn » 26 Apr 2012 09:27

who cares what millions of people are thinking, the clubs care about themselves...not neutrals....as they SHOULD do. There were probably a lot of people watching the Saints/reading game, it didn't stop them having most of the ball while we were pounded and counter attacked all game.

why would chelsea care about your opinion as some random neutral fan?

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21908
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: CheLOLsea

by Royal Rother » 26 Apr 2012 09:33

Victor Meldrew I do think it must be some sort of record for a team to play 2 games,have 3 shots,score 3 goals and get just 2 corners in football generally and there surely can not ever have been such stats for a team reaching a European final.

It would be understandable if this team cost next to nothing as with Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth but when it has cost more to assemble than the opposition then the style of play is almost unforgivable.


It ain't unforgivable but it ain't exactly great for football. In fact it's bloody awful for football.

Still, fair play to them, it worked and you can't argue with that.


User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: CheLOLsea

by Extended-Phenotype » 26 Apr 2012 09:38

FiNeRaIn who cares what millions of people are thinking, the clubs care about themselves...not neutrals....as they SHOULD do. There were probably a lot of people watching the Saints/reading game, it didn't stop them having most of the ball while we were pounded and counter attacked all game.

why would chelsea care about your opinion as some random neutral fan?


Huh?

Sorry is this... let me check, uh yeah, yes it is - it's a discussion forum. Phew, I thought I had the wrong place for a minute there.

I was just saying it was a valid point being made; here we are patting the back of brave little Chelsea after watching them kick the ball as hard as they can with their eyes closed for 90 minutes, all the while forgetting they cost 90 trillion pounds and it was only yesterday they were being called a footballing world power.

It's still an excellent result, but the David and Golliath approach is all rather amusing.

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: CheLOLsea

by FiNeRaIn » 26 Apr 2012 09:39

Extended-Phenotype
FiNeRaIn who cares what millions of people are thinking, the clubs care about themselves...not neutrals....as they SHOULD do. There were probably a lot of people watching the Saints/reading game, it didn't stop them having most of the ball while we were pounded and counter attacked all game.

why would chelsea care about your opinion as some random neutral fan?


Huh?

Sorry is this... let me check, uh yeah, yes it is - it's a discussion forum. Phew, I thought I had the wrong place for a minute there.

I was just saying it was a valid point being made; here we are patting the back of brave little Chelsea after watching them kick the ball as hard as they can with their eyes closed for 90 minutes, all the while forgetting they cost 90 trillion pounds and it was only yesterday they were being called a footballing world power.

It's still an excellent result, but the David and Golliath approach is all rather amusing.


I wasn't talking to you.

was talking to br2, you happened to sammich a reply in.

BR2
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2138
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 13:53
Location: Bournemouth & Ringwood

Re: CheLOLsea

by BR2 » 26 Apr 2012 09:45

FiNeRaIn who cares what millions of people are thinking, the clubs care about themselves...not neutrals....as they SHOULD do. There were probably a lot of people watching the Saints/reading game, it didn't stop them having most of the ball while we were pounded and counter attacked all game.

why would chelsea care about your opinion as some random neutral fan?


I'm not asking Chelsea to worry about what I think on a messageboard used mainly by fans of RFC,I'm expressing an opinion as a fan of football and Chelsea are the latest example of non-entertainment,just as Wimbledon and Stoke have been accused of in the past-their excuse/reason was always that they had vastly inferior players whereas Chelsea fans would never feel that is the case with their big-spending club.

If teams don't entertain then people will turn off the game-it is an entertainment and not just a competition or a sport.
Look at what is happening at Villa where the fans feel that they are not being entertained with long ball regularly played up to a lone striker and goals coming along too rarely,crowds are falling and they might get relegated playing crap football.
This is a big subject and possibly beyond your comprehension and that of TMB but IMHO sport (partly because of the massive earnings involved)needs to be an entertainment or else eventually it will fail and players will be performing at empty stadia with no atmosphere-is that what you want?.

User avatar
who are ya?
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2629
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Bracknell

Re: CheLOLsea

by who are ya? » 26 Apr 2012 09:45

Phuck me, if the plastic Scousers are this unbearable then what must Anfield be like on a matchday, apart from dull.


User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: CheLOLsea

by Extended-Phenotype » 26 Apr 2012 09:46

Finerain I wasn't talking to you.

was talking to br2, you happened to sammich a reply in.


Well, I'm still cross at you.
Last edited by Extended-Phenotype on 26 Apr 2012 09:48, edited 3 times in total.

BR2
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2138
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 13:53
Location: Bournemouth & Ringwood

Re: CheLOLsea

by BR2 » 26 Apr 2012 09:46

FiNeRaIn
Extended-Phenotype
FiNeRaIn who cares what millions of people are thinking, the clubs care about themselves...not neutrals....as they SHOULD do. There were probably a lot of people watching the Saints/reading game, it didn't stop them having most of the ball while we were pounded and counter attacked all game.

why would chelsea care about your opinion as some random neutral fan?


Huh?

Sorry is this... let me check, uh yeah, yes it is - it's a discussion forum. Phew, I thought I had the wrong place for a minute there.

I was just saying it was a valid point being made; here we are patting the back of brave little Chelsea after watching them kick the ball as hard as they can with their eyes closed for 90 minutes, all the while forgetting they cost 90 trillion pounds and it was only yesterday they were being called a footballing world power.

It's still an excellent result, but the David and Golliath approach is all rather amusing.


I wasn't talking to you.

was talking to br2, you happened to sammich a reply in.


A good reply though.

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16854
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: CheLOLsea

by TBM » 26 Apr 2012 09:47

BR2
TBM
Victor Meldrew This is more like it.
Two teams intent on playing attacking football as befits two of the biggest clubs in the world with 13 (?) European Cups between them compared with last night where one relatively little club with no wins and only a bit of recent European football pedigree were playing a side right up there with Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.
The little club played it as if they were Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth playing away at Old Trafford hoping to just hang on in there and get a break-hardly the stuff of potential European Champions and the most negative of teams since Red Star Belgrade.
I do think it must be some sort of record for a team to play 2 games,have 3 shots,score 3 goals and get just 2 corners in football generally and there surely can not ever have been such stats for a team reaching a European final.

It would be understandable if this team cost next to nothing as with Barnsley,Crawley or Bournemouth but when it has cost more to assemble than the opposition then the style of play is almost unforgivable.


Fcuk me, take that Liverpool hat off once in a while - you're worse than Spacey

IT'S BORING!!!


WTF has that got to do with the mighty reds? :roll:


Exactly - so maybe once in a while you could put your hatred for Chelsea and Utd away and actually say something unbiased.

Fact is, if that was Liverpool beating Barca like that in the semi final of the champions league, then you would be saying it was a superb defensive performance and a tactical masterclass from "king kenny"

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: CheLOLsea

by FiNeRaIn » 26 Apr 2012 09:50

BR2
FiNeRaIn who cares what millions of people are thinking, the clubs care about themselves...not neutrals....as they SHOULD do. There were probably a lot of people watching the Saints/reading game, it didn't stop them having most of the ball while we were pounded and counter attacked all game.

why would chelsea care about your opinion as some random neutral fan?


I'm not asking Chelsea to worry about what I think on a messageboard used mainly by fans of RFC,I'm expressing an opinion as a fan of football and Chelsea are the latest example of non-entertainment,just as Wimbledon and Stoke have been accused of in the past-their excuse/reason was always that they had vastly inferior players whereas Chelsea fans would never feel that is the case with their big-spending club.

If teams don't entertain then people will turn off the game-it is an entertainment and not just a competition or a sport.
Look at what is happening at Villa where the fans feel that they are not being entertained with long ball regularly played up to a lone striker and goals coming along too rarely,crowds are falling and they might get relegated playing crap football.
This is a big subject and possibly beyond your comprehension and that of TMB but IMHO sport (partly because of the massive earnings involved)needs to be an entertainment or else eventually it will fail and players will be performing at empty stadia with no atmosphere-is that what you want?.


I do comprehend what you are saying, however what you are failing to comment on is that Reading have employed a similar style more or less all season and in particular the last month. Browsing other teams message boards I was seeing comments like " can see how they are where they are, awful football but effective, no stars but play as a team and defend really well" bla bla. Not a single comment expressed the belief we played enjoyable football. So I take it you won't be turning up to watch Reading anymore as we tend not to put more than 5 passes together and the opposition have most of the ball all game?

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: CheLOLsea

by sandman » 26 Apr 2012 09:51

Because people on other forums are in no way annoyed that we've beaten them.

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16854
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: CheLOLsea

by TBM » 26 Apr 2012 09:52

lol @ thinking a football fan would rather his team lose 5-0 but play "attractive football" than defend for their life and reach the Champions League final, beating Barcelona 3-2 in the semi final.

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: CheLOLsea

by FiNeRaIn » 26 Apr 2012 09:55

sandman Because people on other forums are in no way annoyed that we've beaten them.


umm, im not talking about the teams we've just beaten. You haven't been to many home games this season though have you? Effective...definitely, entertaining? No. Go and check our back from the game threads.

9628 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests

It is currently 19 Dec 2024 13:51