by Royal Rother » 01 Dec 2008 09:33
by Alan Partridge » 01 Dec 2008 10:26
by Deathy » 01 Dec 2008 11:01
Alan Partridge Sunderland > Blackburn.
Soon as Blackburn signed the atrocious Robinson...
by papereyes » 01 Dec 2008 12:03
Royal Rother It's completely irrelevant whether anyone will recall the detail in 3 or 4 years time... If Sunderland get relegated with 20, 30 or 40 points this season it would be hugely embarrassing for Roy Keane. That's it.
by Archie's penalty » 01 Dec 2008 12:20
by Geekins » 01 Dec 2008 12:59
by Alan Partridge » 01 Dec 2008 13:07
Archie's penalty Would love to see Sunderland go down. My least favourite team in the premiership. Full of shoite players last year. Shouldn't have stayed up imho.
Reading 0 Bolton 2 (with no money spent on players) >>>>>Sunderland 1 Bolton 4 (with loads of money spent on players).
HA!
by Archie's penalty » 01 Dec 2008 13:14
Alan PartridgeArchie's penalty Would love to see Sunderland go down. My least favourite team in the premiership. Full of shoite players last year. Shouldn't have stayed up imho.
Reading 0 Bolton 2 (with no money spent on players) >>>>>Sunderland 1 Bolton 4 (with loads of money spent on players).
HA!
Sunderland 1 Bolton 4 in the Premiership>>>> Reading 1 Southampton 2 in the Championship.
'Full of shoite players' Lots of them were squad players and they finished comfortbaly in mid table in the end so they couldn't have been THAT bad to be fair.
by Alan Partridge » 01 Dec 2008 13:21
Archie's penaltyAlan PartridgeArchie's penalty Would love to see Sunderland go down. My least favourite team in the premiership. Full of shoite players last year. Shouldn't have stayed up imho.
Reading 0 Bolton 2 (with no money spent on players) >>>>>Sunderland 1 Bolton 4 (with loads of money spent on players).
HA!
Sunderland 1 Bolton 4 in the Premiership>>>> Reading 1 Southampton 2 in the Championship.
'Full of shoite players' Lots of them were squad players and they finished comfortbaly in mid table in the end so they couldn't have been THAT bad to be fair.
Ok I get your point.
And comfortably mid-table - right. Three points ahead of us in the end. And we were equal with them over the two games we played.
They weren't that good last year, have been crap this year and Keane has in no way deserved the praise heaped on him from some quarters.
To quote the great King Kev 'I would love it, just love it' if they went down...
by Archie's penalty » 01 Dec 2008 13:31
Alan Partridge Don't think in any way Keane is all that good a manager and his eye for a player is questionable and that of a young manager with too much cash burning in his pocket, but they stayed up and we didn't. That's the ultimate answer. They may have 'wasted' £30million this year but the ultimate reward is at least another year of Premiership football. Their defense at the weekend was absolutely woeful ,you'd like to think it' sa bit of a lack of confidence and that individual errors can be cut out. We can pat our own back for saving our money as we play Barnsley next week!
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 01 Dec 2008 13:44
Archie's penaltyAlan Partridge Don't think in any way Keane is all that good a manager and his eye for a player is questionable and that of a young manager with too much cash burning in his pocket, but they stayed up and we didn't. That's the ultimate answer. They may have 'wasted' £30million this year but the ultimate reward is at least another year of Premiership football. Their defense at the weekend was absolutely woeful ,you'd like to think it' sa bit of a lack of confidence and that individual errors can be cut out. We can pat our own back for saving our money as we play Barnsley next week!
I agree with most of that. It's definitely better to be in the prem than the championship but if you look at it objectively we spent nothing and came 8th in our first season up and then just went down. They finished three points ahead of the drop zone and may well go down this year. We also could be returning this year to the prem. If all that happens who had the best club strategy, them or us?
by Alan Partridge » 01 Dec 2008 15:07
Smoking Kills Dancing DoeArchie's penaltyAlan Partridge Don't think in any way Keane is all that good a manager and his eye for a player is questionable and that of a young manager with too much cash burning in his pocket, but they stayed up and we didn't. That's the ultimate answer. They may have 'wasted' £30million this year but the ultimate reward is at least another year of Premiership football. Their defense at the weekend was absolutely woeful ,you'd like to think it' sa bit of a lack of confidence and that individual errors can be cut out. We can pat our own back for saving our money as we play Barnsley next week!
I agree with most of that. It's definitely better to be in the prem than the championship but if you look at it objectively we spent nothing and came 8th in our first season up and then just went down. They finished three points ahead of the drop zone and may well go down this year. We also could be returning this year to the prem. If all that happens who had the best club strategy, them or us?
Them if they stay up. (In the short term)
There are some pretty poor teams in the Prem this season, any from 10 could go down imo. Sunderland's strikers should be enough to keep them.
LOng term is another question.
by Archie's penalty » 01 Dec 2008 15:09
Alan Partridge If they stay up long term then they are financially fine, it's if they come down. It's a gamble, if you've got the money to do it then fair play! But it's a very fine line between success and failure in that league. Sunderland had to spend that £30million to get them to finish about 14th, that's how far they were behind the oher teams at the time of promotion. Reading got 106 points so they must have done something right, it was the second season and the loss of key players that were never replaced that cost Reading. I wasn't one saying we need to spend £30million but we certainly didn't spend or get enough quality players in that 2nd year.
by Alan Partridge » 01 Dec 2008 15:12
Archie's penaltyAlan Partridge If they stay up long term then they are financially fine, it's if they come down. It's a gamble, if you've got the money to do it then fair play! But it's a very fine line between success and failure in that league. Sunderland had to spend that £30million to get them to finish about 14th, that's how far they were behind the oher teams at the time of promotion. Reading got 106 points so they must have done something right, it was the second season and the loss of key players that were never replaced that cost Reading. I wasn't one saying we need to spend £30million but we certainly didn't spend or get enough quality players in that 2nd year.
In hindsight we did not spend the right money on the right players. There were loads of people saying that on here. They were right in the end but it could easily have not been the case.
The club really isn't doing that badly. I'm surprisingly positive again after a very long season last year.
by Archie's penalty » 01 Dec 2008 15:17
Alan PartridgeArchie's penaltyAlan Partridge If they stay up long term then they are financially fine, it's if they come down. It's a gamble, if you've got the money to do it then fair play! But it's a very fine line between success and failure in that league. Sunderland had to spend that £30million to get them to finish about 14th, that's how far they were behind the oher teams at the time of promotion. Reading got 106 points so they must have done something right, it was the second season and the loss of key players that were never replaced that cost Reading. I wasn't one saying we need to spend £30million but we certainly didn't spend or get enough quality players in that 2nd year.
In hindsight we did not spend the right money on the right players. There were loads of people saying that on here. They were right in the end but it could easily have not been the case.
The club really isn't doing that badly. I'm surprisingly positive again after a very long season last year.
But for the sake of an extra few players here and there Reading would have stayed up, probably comfortably in a poor league last season. As for this season yeah they are doing the bare minimum in all honesty. Reading's squad should get the playoffs at worst, tonight is a big game as failure to win would leave them a mountain to climb to catch the top two. I agree with Coppell there is definitely a 'soft under belly' with the current squad and we've lost games we shouldn't have done but overall it's been about 7/10 so far.
by readingbedding » 01 Dec 2008 15:19
by Alan Partridge » 01 Dec 2008 15:22
readingbedding RFC has done very well to recover from relegation, again not too many people have given them credit for that.
by readingbedding » 01 Dec 2008 15:29
by papereyes » 03 Dec 2008 12:09
Eamonn Dunphy-ish Roy Keane has "lost the plot" and is making "some really silly decisions" according to the man who ghost-wrote his autobiography.
Eamonn Dunphy - formerly a very close friend of the Sunderland manager - has laid into Keane with both barrels on Radio Five Live.
Keane's side have lost six of their last seven games and are in the relegation zone despite him spending around £40m this summer.
He has repeatedly suggested that he could walk away from the club and has recently looked like a man who has lost his way.
"He is rambling about all sorts of things and it's really ridiculous," said Dunphy. "He is in serious danger of getting relegated but I think that Roy Keane is beginning to believe the Roy Keane mythology.
"He is pontificating on everything. He's lost the plot. I have the highest regard for him, he's a remarkable, intelligent, family man, but he's lost the plot big time.
"He hasn't had a settled side and I think he is in a fog at the moment. Everyone gets there at some point in your life, when things get too much for you. You don't know where the levers for control are and he's making some really silly decisions. He paid all that money for Anton Ferdinand and dropped him. Then there is Diouf on the bench and out of favour.
"It has been apparent to me for the last 18 months that Roy Keane isn't going to be a serious manager. Like a lot of great players he doesn't appear cut out for management. It's becoming increasingly apparent. I just don't think he has the qualities."
by Archie's penalty » 03 Dec 2008 12:15
papereyesEamonn Dunphy-ish Roy Keane has "lost the plot" and is making "some really silly decisions" according to the man who ghost-wrote his autobiography.
Eamonn Dunphy - formerly a very close friend of the Sunderland manager - has laid into Keane with both barrels on Radio Five Live.
Keane's side have lost six of their last seven games and are in the relegation zone despite him spending around £40m this summer.
He has repeatedly suggested that he could walk away from the club and has recently looked like a man who has lost his way.
"He is rambling about all sorts of things and it's really ridiculous," said Dunphy. "He is in serious danger of getting relegated but I think that Roy Keane is beginning to believe the Roy Keane mythology.
"He is pontificating on everything. He's lost the plot. I have the highest regard for him, he's a remarkable, intelligent, family man, but he's lost the plot big time.
"He hasn't had a settled side and I think he is in a fog at the moment. Everyone gets there at some point in your life, when things get too much for you. You don't know where the levers for control are and he's making some really silly decisions. He paid all that money for Anton Ferdinand and dropped him. Then there is Diouf on the bench and out of favour.
"It has been apparent to me for the last 18 months that Roy Keane isn't going to be a serious manager. Like a lot of great players he doesn't appear cut out for management. It's becoming increasingly apparent. I just don't think he has the qualities."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests