by gazzer, loyal royal » 01 Sep 2009 20:46
by PieEater » 01 Sep 2009 20:52
gazzer, loyal royal it's an interesting one this. UEFA have now set a precedent for themselves and HAVE to ban everyone who appeals against a player who dives
by TBM » 01 Sep 2009 22:54
PieEatergazzer, loyal royal it's an interesting one this. UEFA have now set a precedent for themselves and HAVE to ban everyone who appeals against a player who dives
Not at all, look at RG6's comment, they only need to investigate dives if it makes a difference to the outcome of the game.
by Flyingkiwi » 02 Sep 2009 00:16
by Thaumagurist* » 02 Sep 2009 00:28
TBMPieEatergazzer, loyal royal it's an interesting one this. UEFA have now set a precedent for themselves and HAVE to ban everyone who appeals against a player who dives
Not at all, look at RG6's comment, they only need to investigate dives if it makes a difference to the outcome of the game.
so where do you draw the line? Arsenal were 2-0 up from the 1st leg and playing at home. When wouldn't that dive have made a difference in a 5-1 agg win???
by buzzby » 02 Sep 2009 00:28
by 6ft Kerplunk » 02 Sep 2009 09:53
Thaumagurist* [
What's to say that Celtic could have got 2 goals after the penalty got turned down?
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 02 Sep 2009 09:56
by Silver Fox » 02 Sep 2009 11:38
by soggy biscuit » 02 Sep 2009 12:27
by handbags_harris » 02 Sep 2009 12:43
wickedwhispers Gerrard won't play many games if they invoke this rule to every diving incident.
handbags_harriswickedwhispers Gerrard won't play many games if they invoke this rule to every diving incident.
Neither will Fat Frank, Drogba, Ballack, Coles' J & A...want me to go on Harry?
by Stranded » 02 Sep 2009 12:49
by Alivey » 02 Sep 2009 15:53
by Thaumagurist* » 03 Sep 2009 10:25
by Geekins » 03 Sep 2009 10:50
by Thaumagurist* » 03 Sep 2009 11:31
by Maguire » 03 Sep 2009 11:34
by 1960 » 04 Sep 2009 17:39
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 126 guests