leww_rfc
Surprised no one has noted the BS attached to this shirt....their 150th Anniversary.
Stoke RAMBLERS were formed in 1863. Didnt become Stoke football club until '78 (and City in 1925, but good reason)
If it makes them feel special


by Spirit of Elm Park » 10 May 2012 11:34
leww_rfc
by Whore Jackie » 10 May 2012 11:38
by Royal With Cheese » 10 May 2012 11:45
leww_rfc
by Silver Fox » 10 May 2012 11:52
cmonurz
TBMNo Fixed Abode Liverpool set to unveil their new kit by Warrior this week. Adidas dropped them due to lack of European Football.
Don't you get into Europe via the Carling Cup anymore?
by cmonurz » 10 May 2012 11:56
by Geekins » 10 May 2012 12:00
Silver Foxcmonurz
The shape looks a bit egg chasey to me but thumbs up for the badge, although they could add a basic LFC
by who are ya? » 10 May 2012 12:01
cmonurz I'm sure the biggest kit deal in British football history has made up for that devastating 'fact'.
by cmonurz » 10 May 2012 12:17
No Fixed Abodecmonurz I'm sure the biggest kit deal in British football history has made up for that devastating 'fact'.
But even Liverpool admitted their merchandising will suffer from not having Adidas as their kit supplier due to the massive global brand identity. So Warrior had to make it the biggest kit deal.
by Royal Rother » 10 May 2012 12:18
Royal With Cheeseleww_rfc
Is Peter Crouch on his knees in that picture?
Or perhaps the other two are on milk crates.
by Whore Jackie » 10 May 2012 12:19
No Fixed Abodecmonurz I'm sure the biggest kit deal in British football history has made up for that devastating 'fact'.
But even Liverpool admitted their merchandising will suffer from not having Adidas as their kit supplier due to the massive global brand identity. So Warrior had to make it the biggest kit deal.
With Warrior, Liverpool will control all non-branded merchandising – products outside the usual kit range – and are free to open club stores wherever they choose. That is not the case under Adidas, who control Liverpool's kit supply and the sale of non-branded merchandise, and the club believe they can double the £25m a year from Warrior when the current restrictions are lifted this summer.
Liverpool's managing director, Ian Ayre, explained: "Our business is split in two. We have what you call kit, the branded products, the stuff the players wear, and that's the part of the business that the deal with Warrior covers. In our existing deal, there have been some restrictions on that in terms of the other unbranded products we sell, general retail. That sat within our deal with Adidas in certain lines and in certain markets.
"In our new deal, we have complete control of that. We will still work with Warrior, but we will have a much wider opportunity. That area of business currently represents 50% of everything we generate. The new deal represents half of what we currently generate, so we still have another opportunity to develop similar kind of revenues and that's what encouraged us."
by paultheroyal » 10 May 2012 12:28
cmonurz
by soggy biscuit » 10 May 2012 12:31
soggy biscuit Like that liverpool kit
Been looking forward to the annual Kes slates Liverpool & Reading shirts while raving about Chelsea's
by Geekins » 10 May 2012 12:45
soggy biscuit Like that liverpool kit
Been looking forward to the annual Kes slates Liverpool & Reading shirts while raving about Chelsea's
by soggy biscuit » 10 May 2012 13:11
No Fixed Abode yet
by 1871 Royal » 10 May 2012 15:40
cmonurz
by TBM » 10 May 2012 16:00
by Jackson Corner » 10 May 2012 17:46
cmonurz
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 43 guests