by windermereROYAL » 20 Apr 2021 19:49
by genome » 20 Apr 2021 19:56
by TiagoIlori » 20 Apr 2021 20:00
by Franchise FC » 20 Apr 2021 20:05
genome Ed Woodward has apparently resigned
What the fcuk is happening
by Orion1871 » 20 Apr 2021 20:07
genome Ed Woodward has apparently resigned
What the fcuk is happening
by windermereROYAL » 20 Apr 2021 20:08
by genome » 20 Apr 2021 20:09
by Franchise FC » 20 Apr 2021 20:11
genome Bet Daniel Levy doesn't move a bloody inch
by TheLawnMowerMan » 20 Apr 2021 20:12
genome Bet Daniel Levy doesn't move a bloody inch
by WestYorksRoyal » 20 Apr 2021 20:12
by genome » 20 Apr 2021 20:15
Franchise FCgenome Bet Daniel Levy doesn't move a bloody inch
Isn't he an owner rather than just a chairman ?
by Franchise FC » 20 Apr 2021 20:16
windermereROYAL This is like robbing a bank then afterwards saying you are sorry, it will take a while before they are forgiven. or forgotten.
by Franchise FC » 20 Apr 2021 20:16
genomeFranchise FCgenome Bet Daniel Levy doesn't move a bloody inch
Isn't he an owner rather than just a chairman ?
Joe Lewis is the owner. I think.
by Simmops » 20 Apr 2021 20:20
Franchise FCgenome Ed Woodward has apparently resigned
What the fcuk is happening
Because he wanted it or because he didn't ?
Or possibly because it's an opportunity to get out without admitting he was shit at his (current) job
by Simmops » 20 Apr 2021 20:20
WestYorksRoyal Surely they knew the outrage it would cause? Or are they that detached from reality and incompetent that they didn't foresee the backlash?
by WestYorksRoyal » 20 Apr 2021 20:21
Franchise FCwindermereROYAL This is like robbing a bank then afterwards saying you are sorry, it will take a while before they are forgiven. or forgotten.
To be fair, it's like PLANNING to rob a bank, getting just inside the door, realising that everyone knows who you are and you're going to get nicked, THEN afterwards saying you are sorry
They hadn't actually taken any money (but don't get me wrong, I'm not supporting them at all, just that we can only work with some Rafa Benitez's - i.e. facts)
Although if the announcement was to test the water they may have found it to be significantly higher than boiling point
by WestYorksRoyal » 20 Apr 2021 20:21
SimmopsWestYorksRoyal Surely they knew the outrage it would cause? Or are they that detached from reality and incompetent that they didn't foresee the backlash?
According to talk sport, of course they knew.
by Simmops » 20 Apr 2021 20:22
by Simmops » 20 Apr 2021 20:22
WestYorksRoyalSimmopsWestYorksRoyal Surely they knew the outrage it would cause? Or are they that detached from reality and incompetent that they didn't foresee the backlash?
According to talk sport, of course they knew.
Well then why pull out in response to backlash?
by Simmops » 20 Apr 2021 20:23
WestYorksRoyalFranchise FCwindermereROYAL This is like robbing a bank then afterwards saying you are sorry, it will take a while before they are forgiven. or forgotten.
To be fair, it's like PLANNING to rob a bank, getting just inside the door, realising that everyone knows who you are and you're going to get nicked, THEN afterwards saying you are sorry
They hadn't actually taken any money (but don't get me wrong, I'm not supporting them at all, just that we can only work with some Rafa Benitez's - i.e. facts)
Although if the announcement was to test the water they may have found it to be significantly higher than boiling point
Whatever the analogy, this can't just be forgotten about; there must be consequences. Firstly, it seems the English teams have broken a law codified by the Premier League by signing up to it.
Then the government have announced a review which will doubtless be highly effective and result in radical measures to give clubs back to the fans.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests