by Friday's Legacy » 10 May 2012 17:48
by Jackson Corner » 10 May 2012 17:50
cmonurz I'm sure the biggest kit deal in British football history has made up for that devastating 'fact'.
by cmonurz » 10 May 2012 18:10
by 1871 Royal » 10 May 2012 18:26
Friday's Legacy Like the collar, love the badge, but who is that kit provider? The logo cheapens the shirt.
by Handsome Man » 10 May 2012 19:58
cmonurz American subsidiary of New Balance, apparently. I'm not totally convinced that the target market for football shirts is less likely to buy a replica shirt because it's not made by Adidas.
by URZZ » 10 May 2012 20:38
Friday's Legacy Like the collar, love the badge, but who is that kit provider? The logo cheapens the shirt.
by Cobi » 10 May 2012 21:30
URZZ
Well they've obviously manufactured it rather well whoever they are so credit to them![]()
Amazing shirt
by URZZ » 10 May 2012 21:41
by Whore Jackie » 10 May 2012 22:11
by daswonder » 10 May 2012 23:12
by Whore Jackie » 11 May 2012 06:02
by cmonurz » 11 May 2012 07:06
by TBM » 11 May 2012 07:12
cmonurz Hmm, it's alright, preferred the other one.
by paultheroyal » 11 May 2012 07:58
by who are ya? » 11 May 2012 09:43
by Geekins » 11 May 2012 10:08
cmonurz Hmm, it's alright, preferred the other one.
who are ya? Some Liverpool fans not happy that the old skoool badge is back without the twin flames for the 96..
Surely the Hillsborough cow is running out of milk
by URZZ » 11 May 2012 17:10
No Fixed Abode
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests