Barry the bird boggler Underwater Hotel - tell me how does that work exactly? Or is it exclusively for use of marine life?
Well, as he is a "Sicilian/American businessman" I would imagine that concrete slippers are used........
by Mr Angry » 27 Jan 2012 11:15
Barry the bird boggler Underwater Hotel - tell me how does that work exactly? Or is it exclusively for use of marine life?
by Terminal Boardom » 27 Jan 2012 11:15
Barry the bird boggler Underwater Hotel - tell me how does that work exactly? Or is it exclusively for use of marine life?
by Ark Royal » 29 Jan 2012 02:33
by PieEater » 29 Jan 2012 09:25
by PieEater » 29 Jan 2012 09:48
by Svlad Cjelli » 29 Jan 2012 13:19
PieEater Just of comparison, read the similar blog from a Coventry fan.
http://thetwounfortunates.com/turmoil-w ... ntry-city/
Their austerity will probably cost them relegation. Parachute payments for them would make a massive difference.
We know that at its most profligate, the club was losing £500,000 per month. This has now been reduced to around £300,000 per month, largely thanks to player exits greatly reducing the wage bill.
by Friday's Legacy » 29 Jan 2012 14:30
Ideal LOL, losing £300,000 a month... why do they not cut their cloth!??????
by FiNeRaIn » 29 Jan 2012 14:47
by PieEater » 29 Jan 2012 16:21
Svlad CjelliPieEater Just of comparison, read the similar blog from a Coventry fan.
http://thetwounfortunates.com/turmoil-w ... ntry-city/
Their austerity will probably cost them relegation. Parachute payments for them would make a massive difference.
All depends on how you read it - the sentence that struck me was :We know that at its most profligate, the club was losing £500,000 per month. This has now been reduced to around £300,000 per month, largely thanks to player exits greatly reducing the wage bill.
The austerity they're suffering now comes from past over-spending, that didn't work. And even under this austerity, they're still losing £3.6M a year. How can they justify throwing more money at the team?
by Franchise FC » 29 Jan 2012 19:36
PieEaterSvlad CjelliPieEater Just of comparison, read the similar blog from a Coventry fan.
http://thetwounfortunates.com/turmoil-w ... ntry-city/
Their austerity will probably cost them relegation. Parachute payments for them would make a massive difference.
All depends on how you read it - the sentence that struck me was :We know that at its most profligate, the club was losing £500,000 per month. This has now been reduced to around £300,000 per month, largely thanks to player exits greatly reducing the wage bill.
The austerity they're suffering now comes from past over-spending, that didn't work. And even under this austerity, they're still losing £3.6M a year. How can they justify throwing more money at the team?
My point was that £16m parachute payments would make a massive difference to any other team. Pompey can't even manage to run their squad without a loss with that massive financial advantage. On top of that they got another £10m from CSI!
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Jan 2012 07:30
by Vision » 30 Jan 2012 08:10
Friday's LegacyIdeal LOL, losing £300,000 a month... why do they not cut their cloth!??????
they have, by some £200k a month (2.4m a year), and they are rock bottom because of it, but more is obviously needed. the club is in dire straits.
by Mr Angry » 30 Jan 2012 08:11
by Vision » 30 Jan 2012 08:36
Mr Angry Pompey are effectively bankrupt, with massive debts, massive financial commitments to previous owners, no means to expand the ground or to increase revenue and as a result Zero chance of finding any sort of genuine (rather than fantasist) purchaser.
I'm glad the author of that article enjoyed their FA Cup victory against Cardiff, and his pride in his team getting to a 2nd Final - sadly, it was all done on the fiddle at the expense of other clubs who, by and large, played to the rules.
He is right when he says that they won't be allowed to do another CVA when they haven't even honoured the first one.
Bluntly, Pompey should go under and there is no reason whatsoever for that not to happen, and for it to be a lesson to all other football clubs.
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 30 Jan 2012 08:46
Mr Angry Pompey are effectively bankrupt, with massive debts, massive financial commitments to previous owners, no means to expand the ground or to increase revenue and as a result Zero chance of finding any sort of genuine (rather than fantasist) purchaser.
I'm glad the author of that article enjoyed their FA Cup victory against Cardiff, and his pride in his team getting to a 2nd Final - sadly, it was all done on the fiddle at the expense of other clubs who, by and large, played to the rules.
He is right when he says that they won't be allowed to do another CVA when they haven't even honoured the first one.
Bluntly, Pompey should go under and there is no reason whatsoever for that not to happen, and for it to be a lesson to all other football clubs.
by Dare to Dr£am » 30 Jan 2012 08:51
Mr Angry Pompey are effectively bankrupt, with massive debts, massive financial commitments to previous owners, no means to expand the ground or to increase revenue and as a result Zero chance of finding any sort of genuine (rather than fantasist) purchaser.
I'm glad the author of that article enjoyed their FA Cup victory against Cardiff, and his pride in his team getting to a 2nd Final - sadly, it was all done on the fiddle at the expense of other clubs who, by and large, played to the rules.
He is right when he says that they won't be allowed to do another CVA when they haven't even honoured the first one.
Bluntly, Pompey should go under and there is no reason whatsoever for that not to happen, and for it to be a lesson to all other football clubs.
by Vision » 30 Jan 2012 09:01
by Mr Angry » 30 Jan 2012 10:44
by Uke » 30 Jan 2012 10:54
Mr Angry The very least is that the people who have presided over the management of Pompey should never be allowed near a football club every again - and that includes Mandaric and 'Arry.
As for the fans, they enjoyed the good times by seeing players they knew the club couldn't afford bringing them success at the expense of other clubs (how they - the Pompey fans that is - laughed at Southampton's demise for example) so they, through their acceptance of what was going on in their name as well as their demands for more and more unsustainable on field success constantly financed by financial dodginess, have to shoulder some of the blame as well.
Sorry, but I really have zero sympathy for them
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Jan 2012 10:57
Mr Angry Pompey are effectively bankrupt, with massive debts, massive financial commitments to previous owners, no means to expand the ground or to increase revenue and as a result Zero chance of finding any sort of genuine (rather than fantasist) purchaser.
I'm glad the author of that article enjoyed their FA Cup victory against Cardiff, and his pride in his team getting to a 2nd Final - sadly, it was all done on the fiddle at the expense of other clubs who, by and large, played to the rules.
He is right when he says that they won't be allowed to do another CVA when they haven't even honoured the first one.
Bluntly, Pompey should go under and there is no reason whatsoever for that not to happen, and for it to be a lesson to all other football clubs.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests