

by TBM » 28 Dec 2011 18:34
by handbags_harris » 28 Dec 2011 20:06
by sandman » 29 Dec 2011 08:07
by Handsome Man » 29 Dec 2011 09:28
sandman Yep and Man United fans are all from Surrey or Asia, Chelsea fans are all glory hunters who only started supporting them after Abramovich took over and all Arsenal fans are French crybabies.
by TBM » 29 Dec 2011 10:05
IdealTBM TalkSPORT has been embarrassing today with Liverpool fans moaning about the 1 match ban he is getting, despite the fact he admitted he was guilty![]()
All Liverpool fans are scum, it really is that simple.
by Silver Fox » 29 Dec 2011 10:13
by Hoop Blah » 29 Dec 2011 10:18
by TBM » 29 Dec 2011 11:14
Hoop Blah This latest ban seems a bit OTT if you ask me.
Who else has been banned for similar offences? I don't remember Matt Mills or Fjortoft getting a ban or fine.
There seem to be quite a few other examples of players doing similar things and getting away with it. Is the implication that Suarez has been banned because of his previous?
by Svlad Cjelli » 29 Dec 2011 11:46
TBMHoop Blah This latest ban seems a bit OTT if you ask me.
Who else has been banned for similar offences? I don't remember Matt Mills or Fjortoft getting a ban or fine.
There seem to be quite a few other examples of players doing similar things and getting away with it. Is the implication that Suarez has been banned because of his previous?
They've called it "improper conduct" though, which means they can whack a ban on......similar to Rooney last season when he scored against West Ham and swore - its just Suarez did it via a gesture than words.
by Silver Fox » 29 Dec 2011 11:55
by TBM » 29 Dec 2011 13:03
Svlad CjelliTBMHoop Blah This latest ban seems a bit OTT if you ask me.
Who else has been banned for similar offences? I don't remember Matt Mills or Fjortoft getting a ban or fine.
There seem to be quite a few other examples of players doing similar things and getting away with it. Is the implication that Suarez has been banned because of his previous?
They've called it "improper conduct" though, which means they can whack a ban on......similar to Rooney last season when he scored against West Ham and swore - its just Suarez did it via a gesture than words.
Did anyone complain to the FA when others did it?
by Scylla » 29 Dec 2011 20:40
sandman Yep and Man United fans are all from Surrey or Asia, Chelsea fans are all glory hunters who only started supporting them after Abramovich took over and all Arsenal fans are French crybabies.
by cmonurz » 31 Dec 2011 17:47
by TBM » 31 Dec 2011 18:25
by Scylla » 31 Dec 2011 19:54
TBM "Given the number of times that Mr Suarez used the word 'negro', his conduct is significantly more serious than a one-off use of a racially offensive term and amounts to an aggravating factor."
I dont think the FA will back down over this........if they do, it will only be reduced to 6 games
by Jackson Corner » 01 Jan 2012 05:22
ScyllaTBM "Given the number of times that Mr Suarez used the word 'negro', his conduct is significantly more serious than a one-off use of a racially offensive term and amounts to an aggravating factor."
I dont think the FA will back down over this........if they do, it will only be reduced to 6 games
Did Suarez admit to using 'negro' several times? If so he looks to be in trouble. If it's just Evra's word then it comes down to which unreliable witness you want to believe.
by Barry the bird boggler » 01 Jan 2012 08:20
by Handsome Man » 01 Jan 2012 08:54
by 6ft Kerplunk » 01 Jan 2012 09:27
TBM "Given the number of times that Mr Suarez used the word 'negro', his conduct is significantly more serious than a one-off use of a racially offensive term and amounts to an aggravating factor."
I dont think the FA will back down over this........if they do, it will only be reduced to 6 games
by cmonurz » 01 Jan 2012 11:43
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests