winchester_royal So bored of idiot/bent referees ruining good football matches.
The sooner video technology is introduced to the game the better.
Agreed.
by Man Friday » 05 Mar 2013 21:47
winchester_royal So bored of idiot/bent referees ruining good football matches.
The sooner video technology is introduced to the game the better.
by windermere_royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:47
Ralph Jolly Ferdinand will be lucky to get away with sarcastically applauding the referee right in his face
by Avon Royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:48
soggy biscuit
by Man Friday » 05 Mar 2013 21:49
by windermere_royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:49
winchester_royal So bored of idiot referees ruining good football matches.
The sooner video technology is introduced to the game the better.
by Schards#2 » 05 Mar 2013 21:52
by Avon Royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:52
by windermere_royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:53
by creative_username_1 » 05 Mar 2013 21:53
Avon Royalsoggy biscuit
If a Madrid player had done that to Van Persie and didn't get sent off Fergie would have gone ballistic.
HypocROFLite!
by creative_username_1 » 05 Mar 2013 21:54
windermere_royal Roy Keane backing the ref
by soggy biscuit » 05 Mar 2013 21:55
by windermere_royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:55
creative_username_1Avon Royalsoggy biscuit
If a Madrid player had done that to Van Persie and didn't get sent off Fergie would have gone ballistic.
HypocROFLite!
You don't know that
by winchester_royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:56
windermere_royalwinchester_royal So bored of idiot referees ruining good football matches.
The sooner video technology is introduced to the game the better.
Get a grip no-one died , no-one is up in arms when the decisions go their way.
I see nothing about RVP being offside in the build up to united`s goal
by Avon Royal » 05 Mar 2013 21:59
winchester_royalwindermere_royalwinchester_royal So bored of idiot referees ruining good football matches.
The sooner video technology is introduced to the game the better.
Get a grip no-one died , no-one is up in arms when the decisions go their way.
I see nothing about RVP being offside in the build up to united`s goal
I'm not trying to claim this is a massive travesty of justice, just that an excellent sporting spectacle was ruined by an attention seeking fool who uses a whistle to make up for his undersized penis.
It's daft that in this day and age, a match worth potentially >£30m can be swung so comprehensively by a mistake from one man when technology could easily be implemented for these decisions to be reviewed in real time.
A big shame, because over the two legs United deserved to go through. They can be proud of their efforts tonight.
by rhroyal » 05 Mar 2013 21:59
NTRoyal Genuinely amazed how many of you think it's a sending off. There was no way it was violent conduct, a high foot absolutely, but there was absolutely no intent to injure Arbeloa (?)
by Avon Royal » 05 Mar 2013 22:01
by winchester_royal » 05 Mar 2013 22:02
Avon Royal
I think it was ruined by one fella booting another one in the chest to be fair.
by winchester_royal » 05 Mar 2013 22:03
Retired referee Dermot Gallagher on BBC Radio 5 live: "[The decision was] harsh to say the least but in fairness the Real player did Nani no favours whatsoever. At worst Nani catches the underside of his arm, certainly not the ribs as the guy has gone down and shown.
"I can't reiterate enough that he [Nani] is watching the ball over his shoulder, there was no malice in him. At worst it was a yellow for dangerous play, but if I was refereeing that game I cannot se what stretch of the imagination where I would have sent him off for that."
by Avon Royal » 05 Mar 2013 22:03
winchester_royalAvon Royal
I think it was ruined by one fella booting another one in the chest to be fair.
Yep, it was vicious, it was clear from the way Nani's eyes never left the flight path of the ball that he was intending to cause Arbeloa harm.
by Platypuss » 05 Mar 2013 22:03
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests