Racism in football (John Terry spin-off)

[soggy biscuit]

At least the person making the claim is someone who's word can be trusted

[No Fixed Abode]

Police drop investigation into Clattenburg due to lack of evidence

Would expect Clattenburg to serve 1 more game ban then.

Clattenburg isn't serving any ban. He hasn't been found guilty of anything.

Neither was JT.

[Alexander Litvinenko]

We seem to be in an endless feedback loop here.

Kes makes an incorrect point that everyone knows is wrong, he gets corrected, then a page or two later the same point is back again ......

[No Fixed Abode]

We seem to be in an endless feedback loop here.

Kes makes an incorrect point that everyone knows is wrong, he gets corrected, then a page or two later the same point is back again ......

JT was found not guilty by the Courts and neither was Clattenburg as the police have dropped the case. Same outcome.

[TBM]

At least the person making the claim is someone who's word can be trusted

Man Utd had a lucky escape really

[TFF]

JT was found not guilty by the Courts and neither was Clattenburg as the police have dropped the case. Same outcome.

You know, sometimes I struggle to remind myself that you're a serial wum and don't actually believe what you've written

[Anfield Kopite]

Im sure someone has already explained this to N.F.A. but ill try again. The criteria in a court of law to find somebody guilty is for the offence to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court did not feel this was reached and therefore found Terry not guilty. The criteria of the F.A. independent panel is to find someone guilty on the balance of probability. Its was hardly surprising that the panel came to this conclusion because we had all seen the video. Clattenburg has not been to a court of law because the police have said there is not enough evidence to pursue it. The F.A. may or may not come to the same conclusion. We shall see.

[BR2]

Im sure someone has already explained this to N.F.A. but ill try again. The criteria in a court of law to find somebody guilty is for the offence to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court did not feel this was reached and therefore found Terry not guilty. The criteria of the F.A. independent panel is to find someone guilty on the balance of probability. Its was hardly surprising that the panel came to this conclusion because we had all seen the video. Clattenburg has not been to a court of law because the police have said there is not enough evidence to pursue it. The F.A. may or may not come to the same conclusion. We shall see.

I'm afraid that the very regular poster that you have addressed is one of the thickest that we have to put up with.
He is easily confused and for some reason spends more time on any Liverpool-related topics than on anything to do with his beloved Chelsea and is clearly in need of help and it is questionable whether he should even be out in the community.
He also has an earlier poster name of Kes and is probably older than you think and has apparently left school.
Oh and he only goes to see Chelsea play a couple of times a so per season although the ground is just a few minutes away up the road.

[No Fixed Abode]

Im sure someone has already explained this to N.F.A. but ill try again. The criteria in a court of law to find somebody guilty is for the offence to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court did not feel this was reached and therefore found Terry not guilty. The criteria of the F.A. independent panel is to find someone guilty on the balance of probability. Its was hardly surprising that the panel came to this conclusion because we had all seen the video. Clattenburg has not been to a court of law because the police have said there is not enough evidence to pursue it. The F.A. may or may not come to the same conclusion. We shall see.

I'm afraid that the very regular poster that you have addressed is one of the thickest that we have to put up with.
He is easily confused and for some reason spends more time on any Liverpool-related topics than on anything to do with his beloved Chelsea and is clearly in need of help and it is questionable whether he should even be out in the community.
He also has an earlier poster name of Kes and is probably older than you think and has apparently left school.
Oh and he only goes to see Chelsea play a couple of times a so per season although the ground is just a few minutes away up the road.

Definitely rattLOLed.

[No Fixed Abode]

Im sure someone has already explained this to N.F.A. but ill try again. The criteria in a court of law to find somebody guilty is for the offence to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court did not feel this was reached and therefore found Terry not guilty. The criteria of the F.A. independent panel is to find someone guilty on the balance of probability. Its was hardly surprising that the panel came to this conclusion because we had all seen the video. Clattenburg has not been to a court of law because the police have said there is not enough evidence to pursue it. The F.A. may or may not come to the same conclusion. We shall see.

Thanks for explaining the obvious.

Like I say. If you're cleared by the courts, but found guilty of using inappropriate language by a lesser body such as the FA on the balance of probability, you're going to take that decision with a pinch of salt. In the context JT said, he was merely repeating what Anton Ferdinand accused him of saying. People don't like JT, so in their mind he is guilty any way, despite the courts decision.

[Zammo]

Im sure someone has already explained this to N.F.A. but ill try again. The criteria in a court of law to find somebody guilty is for the offence to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court did not feel this was reached and therefore found Terry not guilty. The criteria of the F.A. independent panel is to find someone guilty on the balance of probability. Its was hardly surprising that the panel came to this conclusion because we had all seen the video. Clattenburg has not been to a court of law because the police have said there is not enough evidence to pursue it. The F.A. may or may not come to the same conclusion. We shall see.

I'm afraid that the very regular poster that you have addressed is one of the thickest that we have to put up with.
He is easily confused and for some reason spends more time on any Liverpool-related topics than on anything to do with his beloved Chelsea and is clearly in need of help and it is questionable whether he should even be out in the community.
He also has an earlier poster name of Kes and is probably older than you think and has apparently left school.
Oh and he only goes to see Chelsea play a couple of times a so per season although the ground is just a few minutes away up the road.

[Anfield Kopite]

oxf*rd hell. 'he was only repeating back what Ferdinand said'. No, that was what he claimed. Ferdinand said this wasnt true because he hadnt said it. The F.A. found on the basis of probability that Tery wasnt telling the truth and Ferdinand was. Hence guilty and a 4 game ban.

[Anfield Kopite]

Br2. Your post describing the wum/troll that is Kes/NFA appears to be spot on.

[Ian Royal]

I imagine that he doesn't give a monkeys what you think.

Would expect Clattenburg to serve 1 more game ban then.

Clattenburg isn't serving any ban. He hasn't been found guilty of anything.

Neither was JT.

Apparently he does.

[floyd__streete]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20321225

Is it just me or is this Peter Herbert a complete and utter mentalist? For those who ain't clicking shit, he is now ranting about a cover-up between Chelsea and the FA. The police have said "move along now, sonny, nothing to see here" and he comes out with ""It really does beggar belief that the primary football authorities in the country do not understand the seriousness of hate crime".

Peter Herbert - speaking on behalf of a sector of society (Lawyers, not black people before any comedian steps in ) well known for being unscrupulous, underhanded, money-grabbing villains who rub their hands at glee at the thought of protecting terrorists like Abu Qatada - does more to tarnish race relations in this country with his recent words and actions than that meat-headed moron John Terry could ever do. Still, at least he got himself on the papers with his mental, paranoid crusade. Go and busy yourself defending the human rights of a drink-driving scumbag who has knocked over a little old lady or something.

[3 veesinarow]

It might help him be taken more seriously if he wasn't a doppelganger for a Magnum Almond...allegedly.

Apparently, according to the description, they are milky chocolate outside, white ice-cream inside with a thick layer of nuts...

[John Madejski's Wallet]

WTF is it with the Black Lawyers spakkers ???

Now says its utterly racist for the Spurs fans to be calling themselves 'Yids'. In complete contravention with every Jewish spurs fan or Jewish WWII immigrant anyone has been able to interview. Also saying they will raise a prosecution with the police EVERY game the fans chant it from now on

Don't they actually have jobs to do?

There just aren't enough to describe them

[biscuitman]

MailOnline have removed an article regarding Diouf being targeted with racial abuse today. Completely made up apparently.

[Anfield Kopite]

MailOnline have removed an article regarding Diouf being targeted with racial abuse today. Completely made up apparently.

If its El hadj Diouf you are on about, he himself has been accused of making racist comments in the past

[soggy biscuit]

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danhodges/100189587/if-chelsea-have-slandered-mark-clattenburg-as-a-racist-the-club-should-be-relegated-immediately/