PEARCEY Lets be honest. No-one thought London would win the Olympics. Did anyone complain about that vote being crooked? Did the French bang on about it? Nope.
Oh yes, they did.
by SpaceCruiser » 05 Dec 2010 11:24
PEARCEY Lets be honest. No-one thought London would win the Olympics. Did anyone complain about that vote being crooked? Did the French bang on about it? Nope.
by readingbedding » 05 Dec 2010 11:37
by papereyes » 05 Dec 2010 13:27
PieEaterleon Having the best "technical bid" and pre-built footballing infrastructure is utterly irrelevant if FIFA are looking to use the World Cup to develop the game in countries/regions where this isn't there already?
In previous World Cups, that was true for South Africa, what about Germany, France and Italy? Saying that now sounds like a convenient excuse to me.
Historically they have alternated, established European country to a developing country.
by papereyes » 05 Dec 2010 13:28
leon apparently we promised to not bid the 2006 World Cup to let Germany go for it if they supported our 1996 European championship bid (successful)
Guess what? We bid the 2006 world cup. So anyway back to these backstabbing FIFA characters....
by papereyes » 05 Dec 2010 13:31
PEARCEY
How many other nations have hosted the Olympics twice? Greece,USA,Germany......it may be 64 years by 2012 but it still puts England right up there with an elite who have been hosts more than once.
by PEARCEY » 05 Dec 2010 14:36
by papereyes » 05 Dec 2010 14:38
by PEARCEY » 05 Dec 2010 14:47
papereyes behind the US (LA (twice), St louis and Atlanta) obviously.
by facaldaqui » 05 Dec 2010 20:04
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Dec 2010 20:28
by RoyalChicagoFC » 05 Dec 2010 20:31
PEARCEYpapereyes behind the US (LA (twice), St louis and Atlanta) obviously.
I didn't look at that part of your map...USA hosts four times. I didn't realise that.
by frimmers3 » 05 Dec 2010 20:41
AthleticoSpizz Well done Boris (legend), I would've taken it a stage further, and alerted immigration/customs to ban them from entering this countries airports ever again.
2 votes...pathetic
by PEARCEY » 05 Dec 2010 20:45
RoyalChicagoFCPEARCEYpapereyes behind the US (LA (twice), St louis and Atlanta) obviously.
I didn't look at that part of your map...USA hosts four times. I didn't realise that.
Yeah but we're good @ that so fairy nuff imo tbh
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Dec 2010 20:46
yes why not you old sagefrimmers3AthleticoSpizz Well done Boris (legend), I would've taken it a stage further, and alerted immigration/customs to ban them from entering this countries airports ever again.
2 votes...pathetic
i like that kind of thinking. let's ban also all tourists from entering the country from nations that did not vote for us with regard to the world cup.just you,me and sid and doris bonkers at the royal wedding.
by frimmers3 » 05 Dec 2010 20:54
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Dec 2010 21:00
by PEARCEY » 05 Dec 2010 21:10
by roadrunner » 05 Dec 2010 21:13
AthleticoSpizz Sky (and them expecting me to pay for what once was free to veiw within the confines of the TV Licence) can go f11ck themselves.
I stand alone when it comes to Sky....but cannot believe that folk are prepared to part with 5 or 6 hundred pounds per year to watch adverts and basically what once was free
by RoyalChicagoFC » 05 Dec 2010 21:15
PEARCEYRoyalChicagoFCPEARCEY
USA hosts four times. I didn't realise that.
Yeah but we're good @ that so fairy nuff imo tbh
Yes Atlanta was a raving success
by leon » 05 Dec 2010 23:41
AthleticoSpizz Well done Boris (legend), I would've taken it a stage further, and alerted immigration/customs to ban them from entering this countries airports ever again.
2 votes...pathetic
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests