Modern football things you don't like

User avatar
BRO_BOT
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5609
Joined: 19 Jul 2023 23:48
Location: No reading. No research. Just strong opinions.

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by BRO_BOT » 13 Feb 2025 11:17

Winston Biscuit


That graph looks like they decided what they wanted to happen and then fitted the data afterwards

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27281
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Sanguine » 13 Feb 2025 11:22

Dirk Gently There's only really PL "security" for about a third of the teams there, and for all the others I'd argue that there's a perennial fear of relegation.


I'd argue not for two thirds of the division, but you've successfully made your own argument circular. If 14 teams can be relegated at the start of the season, and the Championship, and League One, is full of teams who have been in the PL in the recent past, then by definition the PL, and staying in it, is no closed shop at all.

Your argument seems to be - 'okay well, except Forest, Bournemouth, Brentford, Fulham, Villa, Bolton, Wolves and Wigan.....'

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 37904
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: hanging with the cool kids

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Winston Biscuit » 21 Feb 2025 18:22

The word 'ball' being added to the end of a managers name.

User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25347
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by From Despair To Where? » 22 Feb 2025 08:50

What, like ex Pompey manager Alan?

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3802
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: How can we win when fools can be kings?

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Orion1871 » 06 Mar 2025 08:34

The half time show at the next World Cup Final.


User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 37904
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: hanging with the cool kids

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Winston Biscuit » 06 Mar 2025 09:22

it seemingly being completely acceptable for many players to now fake head injuries because it gets play stopped

Royality creeps In
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1095
Joined: 18 May 2014 19:35

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Royality creeps In » 07 Mar 2025 07:06

All this “High Five” shite with everyone and their dog on the bench when players are substituted/hooked.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 21542
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Sutekh » 09 Mar 2025 14:07

Officials managing to add on enough time for that last minute corner or even attack despite time being up.

User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25347
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by From Despair To Where? » 10 Mar 2025 15:51

Maybe a slight tangent from the original point and more a symptom of the ever expanding reach of social media making the usual fan bullshit more visible but I've been highly amused by the sort of mental gymnastics employed by Arsenal fans over the last month or so.

<EDIT> I see SF has made a similar point on the Weekend Football thread.


Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27281
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Sanguine » 10 Mar 2025 16:04

Related to Arsenal comments on the other thread - but in general, big clubs complaining about injuries. Moreso than ever the top 6/8 have an indescribable financial advantage. 'But...injuries' normally just means having to play a £50m reserve instead of a £80m first-choice player, like poor old Pep having to select Matheus Nunes.

Obviously this only goes so far - Liverpool losing every single senior centre-back in their squad aside from Nat Philips was ridiculous, and led to them pairing Fabinho and Henderson at the back. But even that was only for a couple of games.

You've got a big squad. Injuries are a thing.

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 37904
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: hanging with the cool kids

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Winston Biscuit » 10 Mar 2025 16:09

very much agree. Got very bored this season of PL fans banging on about their clubs 'injury crisis'.

User avatar
BRO_BOT
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5609
Joined: 19 Jul 2023 23:48
Location: No reading. No research. Just strong opinions.

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by BRO_BOT » 10 Mar 2025 17:05

Winston Biscuit very much agree. Got very bored this season of PL fans banging on about their clubs 'injury crisis'.


Utd have about 12 senior players available. Yesterday we had to sub an injured 19yo for a 17yo

Think it was the Fulham game but at one stage (ET) we would only have been able to call Goalkeepers of the bench (to fill outfield positions)

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 37904
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: hanging with the cool kids

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Winston Biscuit » 10 Mar 2025 18:31

BRO_BOT
Winston Biscuit very much agree. Got very bored this season of PL fans banging on about their clubs 'injury crisis'.


Utd have about 12 senior players available. Yesterday we had to sub an injured 19yo for a 17yo


Looking at the line up yesterday, I reckon Man Utd had 6 or 7 players (maybe more) starting who would be first XI if everyone was fit, then Hoijland came on from the bench too.

In fact, which of those players in the starting XI wouldn't make it onto the pitch for a single minute if the whole squad was fit?



User avatar
BRO_BOT
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5609
Joined: 19 Jul 2023 23:48
Location: No reading. No research. Just strong opinions.

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by BRO_BOT » 10 Mar 2025 19:51

Casemiro, Erikson, Dalot, Lindelof, one of Zirkzee/Garnacho, and one of Mazraoui/Yoro

would be out for:

Ugarte, Mainoo, Dorgo, Shaw, Martinez, Amad, (poss) Maguire

If everyone was fit, so about half the team

Subs:

R. Højlund (Starter)
H. Amass (academy)
T. Collyer (academy*)
J. Fletcher (academy)
E. Harrison (academy)
A. Heaven (academy*)
D. Mee (academy)
J. Moorhouse (academy)
C. Obi (academy*)

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 37904
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: hanging with the cool kids

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by Winston Biscuit » 10 Mar 2025 20:20

BRO_BOT Casemiro, Erikson, Dalot, Lindelof, one of Zirkzee/Garnacho, and one of Mazraoui/Yoro

would be out


Some of those would deffo get minutes if the whole squad was fit

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25054
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by AthleticoSpizz » 10 Mar 2025 20:33

….all a bit boo-hoo for the mighty reds, ………..sponsorship monies, full stadium of fans paying big bucks, global souvenir sales etc etc yet cannot raise a team?
Some geezer claiming to be MUs owner (Jimbo someone?) on Five Live tonight saying, without his intervention MU would be broke by November of this year.
Same bloke saying MU will be the most profitable team in the ‘universe’ within three years.

Reduced to this^

No sympathy

(must admit, cannot remember the last time I saw a kid or even his dad wearing the MU shirt in or around Reading lately).

:lol:


No sympathies for any of the ‘top tier’ teams ‘hardships’ tbf

User avatar
BRO_BOT
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5609
Joined: 19 Jul 2023 23:48
Location: No reading. No research. Just strong opinions.

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by BRO_BOT » 10 Mar 2025 20:37

Winston Biscuit
BRO_BOT Casemiro, Erikson, Dalot, Lindelof, one of Zirkzee/Garnacho, and one of Mazraoui/Yoro

would be out


Some of those would deffo get minutes if the whole squad was fit


Casemiro, Erikson, Lindelof are out of favour (and out of contract at the end of the season, bye!)

Dalot has been oxf*rd awful this season. TBF he's a right back who has to play on the left. He would get in the team as a utility player (your Phil Neville, your John O'Shea) but that's it. If Amad/Shaw*/Dorgu are fit he starts on the bench

Amad is getting in ahead of one of Zirkzee/Garnacho if played in the 10 and ahead of Mazraouri if played at WB

Amorin rotates (and subs) the CBs a lot so Mazraoui/Yoro would get time.


(*Shaw: fit lol)

User avatar
BRO_BOT
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5609
Joined: 19 Jul 2023 23:48
Location: No reading. No research. Just strong opinions.

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by BRO_BOT » 10 Mar 2025 21:00

AthleticoSpizz ….all a bit boo-hoo for the mighty reds, ………..sponsorship monies, full stadium of fans paying big bucks, global souvenir sales etc etc yet cannot raise a team?

Some geezer claiming to be MUs owner (Jimbo someone?) on Five Live tonight saying, without his intervention MU would be broke by November of this year. Same bloke saying MU will be the most profitable team in the ‘universe’ within three years.

Reduced to this^No sympathy (must admit, cannot remember the last time I saw a kid or even his dad wearing the MU shirt in or around Reading lately). :lol: No sympathies for any of the ‘top tier’ teams ‘hardships’ tbf


The Glazers bought the club on debt, i.e. zero of their OWN money put in. This has cost UNITED over £1 BILLION in interest payments and barely touched the principle. The Glazers used to take £10 million a year in dividend payments as well. So you have wealthy owners exploiting fans to make more money whilst running the club into the ground, e.g OT leaking stadium, no resources for a women's team etc etc. Hundreds have lost their jobs due to the current cost-cutting. You are not allowed to purchase a club like this anymore (afaik)

Alex Ferguson operated a net gain in player sales/purchases for the period when the Glazers took over in 2005 to when he retired in 2013

They appointed the people to run the club, Woodward, etc, who have torched money with some terrible player purchases. I'm not sure I buy the idea that they alone were responsible for increasing revenue. Other clubs have also made increased revenue, a rising tide, etc

Would just like to see a sale and the debt cleared. Any revenue Utd makes going back into the club rather than interest and the Glazers' back pocket.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25054
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Mar 2025 08:32

Must admit, I’d never really paid too much attention to MUs recent plights…..so thanx for that Brobes

…..and fcuk, is it really 12 years since their last ‘Fergie time’?

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 31668
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: Modern football things you don't like

by leon » 11 Mar 2025 08:46

BRO_BOT
AthleticoSpizz ….all a bit boo-hoo for the mighty reds, ………..sponsorship monies, full stadium of fans paying big bucks, global souvenir sales etc etc yet cannot raise a team?

Some geezer claiming to be MUs owner (Jimbo someone?) on Five Live tonight saying, without his intervention MU would be broke by November of this year. Same bloke saying MU will be the most profitable team in the ‘universe’ within three years.

Reduced to this^No sympathy (must admit, cannot remember the last time I saw a kid or even his dad wearing the MU shirt in or around Reading lately). :lol: No sympathies for any of the ‘top tier’ teams ‘hardships’ tbf


The Glazers bought the club on debt, i.e. zero of their OWN money put in. This has cost UNITED over £1 BILLION in interest payments and barely touched the principle. The Glazers used to take £10 million a year in dividend payments as well. So you have wealthy owners exploiting fans to make more money whilst running the club into the ground, e.g OT leaking stadium, no resources for a women's team etc etc. Hundreds have lost their jobs due to the current cost-cutting. You are not allowed to purchase a club like this anymore (afaik)

Alex Ferguson operated a net gain in player sales/purchases for the period when the Glazers took over in 2005 to when he retired in 2013

They appointed the people to run the club, Woodward, etc, who have torched money with some terrible player purchases. I'm not sure I buy the idea that they alone were responsible for increasing revenue. Other clubs have also made increased revenue, a rising tide, etc

Would just like to see a sale and the debt cleared. Any revenue Utd makes going back into the club rather than interest and the Glazers' back pocket.


Sorry I thought you loved US Capitalism? Leveraged buy outs were all the rage! As is cost cutting, lack of infrastructure investment and getting rid of the little guys whilst over paying for "talent" !!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests

It is currently 02 Apr 2025 17:49