Barry the bird bogglerWax Jacket SSN saying it's been referred by the FA (not PL) to FIFA with an answer tomorrow
I bet FIFA agree to it...
Aren't FIFA dead against all the debt in the PL? Certainly UEFA seem to be, so I can't see it being agreed.
by Ian Royal » 18 Feb 2010 17:34
Barry the bird bogglerWax Jacket SSN saying it's been referred by the FA (not PL) to FIFA with an answer tomorrow
I bet FIFA agree to it...
by Sun Tzu » 18 Feb 2010 17:35
TBMSun TzuTBM Surely they could just "sell" the player now (but wont move till the next window) and at least prove they have the funds coming in at the end of the season.........
That would mean the player couldn't then play any games. May not be very popular with the player !!
I mean have a pre-contract in place........you can put a bid in for players whenever you like but the deal doesn't go through until the transfer window is open again, so they could sell some players this way and say to the courts "look we'll be getting £10m from them in June" etc
by Wax Jacket » 18 Feb 2010 17:43
by PieEater » 18 Feb 2010 17:46
by PieEater » 18 Feb 2010 17:48
Wax Jacket 24 hours to get the richest person anyone in Pompey knows to fly to FIFA with a big old bag of cash
by Geekins » 18 Feb 2010 17:50
PieEater Don't the players have a say in the deal too?
It would be in their interest not to accept a move as they will all probably be able to move on a free shortly anyway and possibly get higher wages. If Pompey do manage to get to the end of the season there'll be a firesale.
by TFF » 18 Feb 2010 18:36
Ian RoyalBarry the bird bogglerWax Jacket SSN saying it's been referred by the FA (not PL) to FIFA with an answer tomorrow
I bet FIFA agree to it...
Aren't FIFA dead against all the debt in the PL? Certainly UEFA seem to be, so I can't see it being agreed.
by exileinleeds » 18 Feb 2010 18:51
by TFF » 18 Feb 2010 19:05
exileinleeds I suspect there will also be cries of "unfair" if, for example Bolton pick up a couple of players, who make an impact at say the expense of West Ham. There is so much about unfair advantage...I can't see them going with it.
by rabidbee » 18 Feb 2010 19:40
by 6ft Kerplunk » 18 Feb 2010 20:09
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 18 Feb 2010 20:16
by rabidbee » 18 Feb 2010 20:19
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe Maybe I am missing the point, but why dont Pompey go into administration?
Arch "Meanwhile, a financial expert says Portsmouth face a very real threat of extinction because of their financial problems and he believes administration is an unlikely option. 'Arguably, the level of debt associated with this case will mean that it is unlikely that a suitable or willing benefactor will be found,' said Simon Wilson, a partner with restructuring experts Zolfo Cooper. 'Portsmouth therefore face the very real threat of liquidation because it is increasingly unlikely that an administration order will be sought or granted.'"
by Ark Royal » 18 Feb 2010 20:27
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 18 Feb 2010 20:33
rabidbeeSmoking Kills Dancing Doe Maybe I am missing the point, but why dont Pompey go into administration?Arch "Meanwhile, a financial expert says Portsmouth face a very real threat of extinction because of their financial problems and he believes administration is an unlikely option. 'Arguably, the level of debt associated with this case will mean that it is unlikely that a suitable or willing benefactor will be found,' said Simon Wilson, a partner with restructuring experts Zolfo Cooper. 'Portsmouth therefore face the very real threat of liquidation because it is increasingly unlikely that an administration order will be sought or granted.'"
by Royal Rother » 18 Feb 2010 20:34
by T.R.O.L.I. » 18 Feb 2010 20:44
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 18 Feb 2010 20:49
by T.R.O.L.I. » 18 Feb 2010 20:56
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 18 Feb 2010 20:59
Users browsing this forum: BRO_BOT, Silver Fox and 112 guests