Tony Le Mesmer Considering Creditors are getting 2p in the pound, Yes, its a complete Joke and totally unjustified.
If you invite the devil you suffer his fire!
by watfordroyal » 15 Aug 2012 16:01
Tony Le Mesmer Considering Creditors are getting 2p in the pound, Yes, its a complete Joke and totally unjustified.
by Ian Royal » 15 Aug 2012 16:15
Spirit of Elm ParkDeadlock Do you think administrators work for nothing, then?
Obviously. Does a comment like that make you clever?
Did I say that?
Straw poll....If anyone can be arsed to prove my point...Please indicate your feelings toward this statement:
Is 4.8m a Joke amount for an administrator to be paid by a Football club on the brink of liquidation.
Yes or No.
i would guess most, like me, would suggest Yes.
by watfordroyal » 15 Aug 2012 16:42
Ian Royal
No, you moron.
by Schards#2 » 15 Aug 2012 16:58
by Mr Angry » 15 Aug 2012 17:23
by Ian Royal » 15 Aug 2012 17:25
watfordroyalIan Royal
No, you moron.
See IanRoyal, why do you have to do that,
If you don't agree with him/her, just say so & why,
It's a debate, why do you have to make a personal comment.
It's more a reflection on you, I'm afraid.
by watfordroyal » 15 Aug 2012 17:30
Schards#2 If the administrators are charging themselves out at, say an average of £200 per hour, that's 24,000 hours.
I find it hard to believe they have worked a fraction of that figure so, yes, it's a pisstake.
My heart is literally bleeding for them.
by Spirit of Elm Park » 15 Aug 2012 17:31
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Aug 2012 17:44
watfordroyalIan Royal
No, you moron.
See IanRoyal, why do you have to do that,
If you don't agree with him/her, just say so & why,
It's a debate, why do you have to make a personal comment.
It's more a reflection on you, I'm afraid.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 15 Aug 2012 17:44
by Stranded » 15 Aug 2012 17:47
by Ian Royal » 15 Aug 2012 18:11
Spirit of Elm Park It's no being naive, or a Moron Ian, thanks for the input. It is an obscene amount of money that just does not seem justified. I'm not 100% sure 4.8 is the true figure, even if it end up being a million plus, for an administrator who effectively failed in their task. I don't doubt the work that goes on behind the scenes, but it's hardly helping in the scheme of things. Surely it makes more sense to just liquidate than rack up a further creditor (or so it seems).
It is after all a recession, Portsmouth f'd up, and personally I wish they would just die quietly, but the admins here need to take a long hard look at themselves IMO.
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 15 Aug 2012 19:48
Ideal
Despite his behaviour repeatedly being similar to that of a sewer-rat, he seems to think he has the moral high ground in every single debate.
Simply put, he's a cock gobbler.
by Ian Royal » 15 Aug 2012 22:20
Who Moved The Goalposts?Ideal
Despite his behaviour repeatedly being similar to that of a sewer-rat, he seems to think he has the moral high ground in every single debate.
Simply put, he's a cock gobbler.
I take it you're not drinking buddies then?
by SpaceCruiser » 15 Aug 2012 22:21
IdealVictor Meldrew I'm afraid Ian is not very good when it comes to the social graces.
It comes,in part,perhaps from the fact that he never goes to football but sees himself as a top pundit.
Despite his behaviour repeatedly being similar to that of a sewer-rat, he seems to think he has the moral high ground in every single debate.
Simply put, he's a cock gobbler.
by Rax » 15 Aug 2012 22:51
by SpaceCruiser » 15 Aug 2012 22:53
Rax ...to be honest I'm not bothered if the admin fees are £1.8m, £4.8m or whatever - as someone rightly pointed out earlier, it's an obscene amount of money to be charging when the unfortunate small businesses, charities and man on the street is forced to accept 2p in the £.
It seems that the admins have a right old gravy train on the go here - regardless of whether it's Portsmouth, Leeds or Plymouth - players are protected by the FCR - the admins get the rest and between them they don't give one if half a dozen small businesses fold due to cashflow problems caused in the main by "X football club" not paying it's debts.
Shame on all of them - the lowest of the low!
by Rax » 15 Aug 2012 23:05
SpaceCruiserRax ...to be honest I'm not bothered if the admin fees are £1.8m, £4.8m or whatever - as someone rightly pointed out earlier, it's an obscene amount of money to be charging when the unfortunate small businesses, charities and man on the street is forced to accept 2p in the £.
It seems that the admins have a right old gravy train on the go here - regardless of whether it's Portsmouth, Leeds or Plymouth - players are protected by the FCR - the admins get the rest and between them they don't give one if half a dozen small businesses fold due to cashflow problems caused in the main by "X football club" not paying it's debts.
Shame on all of them - the lowest of the low!
Not so low as a club spending money that they don't have.
by Mr. Reading » 16 Aug 2012 07:29
by Mr Angry » 16 Aug 2012 08:43
Users browsing this forum: BRO_BOT, what_wind_turbine? and 31 guests