by strap » 03 Sep 2008 13:27
by brendywendy » 03 Sep 2008 13:30
by Huntley & Palmer » 03 Sep 2008 13:32
strap Seems the kitchen just got even hotter. Aty first glance it's bad news for football at the very top, although for the 87 of the 92 league clubs without sugar daddies, it really should be busiuness as usual ignoring ther top 4 places of the PL.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/manchester_city/article4663705.ece
Some rather apposite paragraphs in the link that will strike a chord at RFC.
"Making money is old hat and investors wishing to balance a profit with sporting success will be gradually squeezed out."
"Freeze-frame on Newcastle United [Reading] for the flip side of this story. Here is an owner, Mike Ashley, [Mr Ego], who invested in football for reasons of vanity but became increasingly alarmed at how much it was going to cost him to continue looking good."
"Ashley [Mr Ego] wanted the adulation football brings but was uncomfortable with its attendant costs. "
In truth, the creep of the billionaire into football will surely merely accelerate the formation of a formal European League, leaving the rest of us to play in our national leagues without the likes of Man U and now C, Liverpool, Chealsea and Arsenal. The same thing will happen in Spain (minus Real Madrid and Barcelona), Italy (minus AC, Inter et al) and Germany.
On reflection, that scenario might just be in the interests of RFC.
by Southbank Old Boy » 03 Sep 2008 13:40
brendywendy i think the man city deal speeds up that process in this country
the old top four will now be shitting themselevs about the real possibility of someone coming in and taking one of the four CL places, leaving one, probably arsenal or liverpool in a real mess when they dont achieve th elevel of football required to finance their massive new stadia
by Thaumagurist* » 03 Sep 2008 13:41
by Vision » 03 Sep 2008 13:46
Huntley & Palmerstrap Seems the kitchen just got even hotter. Aty first glance it's bad news for football at the very top, although for the 87 of the 92 league clubs without sugar daddies, it really should be busiuness as usual ignoring ther top 4 places of the PL.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/manchester_city/article4663705.ece
Some rather apposite paragraphs in the link that will strike a chord at RFC.
"Making money is old hat and investors wishing to balance a profit with sporting success will be gradually squeezed out."
"Freeze-frame on Newcastle United [Reading] for the flip side of this story. Here is an owner, Mike Ashley, [Mr Ego], who invested in football for reasons of vanity but became increasingly alarmed at how much it was going to cost him to continue looking good."
"Ashley [Mr Ego] wanted the adulation football brings but was uncomfortable with its attendant costs. "
In truth, the creep of the billionaire into football will surely merely accelerate the formation of a formal European League, leaving the rest of us to play in our national leagues without the likes of Man U and now C, Liverpool, Chealsea and Arsenal. The same thing will happen in Spain (minus Real Madrid and Barcelona), Italy (minus AC, Inter et al) and Germany.
On reflection, that scenario might just be in the interests of RFC.
What significance does this make to us?
by Stranded » 03 Sep 2008 13:50
by Streets » 03 Sep 2008 13:56
VisionHuntley & Palmerstrap Seems the kitchen just got even hotter. Aty first glance it's bad news for football at the very top, although for the 87 of the 92 league clubs without sugar daddies, it really should be busiuness as usual ignoring ther top 4 places of the PL.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/manchester_city/article4663705.ece
Some rather apposite paragraphs in the link that will strike a chord at RFC.
"Making money is old hat and investors wishing to balance a profit with sporting success will be gradually squeezed out."
"Freeze-frame on Newcastle United [Reading] for the flip side of this story. Here is an owner, Mike Ashley, [Mr Ego], who invested in football for reasons of vanity but became increasingly alarmed at how much it was going to cost him to continue looking good."
"Ashley [Mr Ego] wanted the adulation football brings but was uncomfortable with its attendant costs. "
In truth, the creep of the billionaire into football will surely merely accelerate the formation of a formal European League, leaving the rest of us to play in our national leagues without the likes of Man U and now C, Liverpool, Chealsea and Arsenal. The same thing will happen in Spain (minus Real Madrid and Barcelona), Italy (minus AC, Inter et al) and Germany.
On reflection, that scenario might just be in the interests of RFC.
What significance does this make to us?
Presumably because strap thinks Ashley's 15 minutes of fame @ Newcastle equates to Madejski's 15 years @ Reading.
by prostak » 03 Sep 2008 14:15
strap "Freeze-frame on Newcastle United [Reading] for the flip side of this story. Here is an owner, Mike Ashley, [Mr Ego], who invested in football for reasons of vanity but became increasingly alarmed at how much it was going to cost him to continue looking good."
by readingbedding » 03 Sep 2008 14:17
Stranded So in a nutshell,
We had no chance of ever reaching the top 4 prior to the Man City takeover, we have none now.
Relevance to Reading FC = zero.
Relevance to strap = another random reason to have a dig at JM.
by Silver Fox » 03 Sep 2008 14:38
by TVPRoyal » 03 Sep 2008 15:21
by Huntley & Palmer » 03 Sep 2008 15:23
by sheshnu » 03 Sep 2008 16:00
by cmonurz » 03 Sep 2008 16:21
Thaumagurist* I'm getting real tired of Strap calling our esteemed chairman "Mr Ego".
by cmonurz » 03 Sep 2008 16:23
by Huntley & Palmer » 03 Sep 2008 16:26
by cmonurz » 03 Sep 2008 16:28
by Huntley & Palmer » 03 Sep 2008 16:30
by Thaumagurist* » 03 Sep 2008 16:33
cmonurzThaumagurist* I'm getting real tired of Strap calling our esteemed chairman "Mr Ego".
Wet Sham, etc.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests