by Kitsondinho » 18 Feb 2009 15:06
by Alivey » 18 Feb 2009 17:58
by Sun Tzu » 18 Feb 2009 20:51
by Kitsondinho » 18 Feb 2009 20:54
Sun Tzu A couple of thoughts
1. Wouldn't this simply mean that the richest clubs had a built in advantage that could effectively never be over come ? Chelsea only broke through because an individual was prepared to bankroll them, Wigan and Blackburn got where they are because individuals willingly spent a lot of their own money. This idea suggests that there is only one legitimate source of income... Would it not be better to restrict the degree that clubs are allowed to go into debt ?
2. It would make more sense to ensure football revenues are distributed more fairly to allow more clubs to compete financially
by StevenKelliher » 18 Feb 2009 21:14
by Alivey » 18 Feb 2009 21:39
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests