Rumour - Federici to Swansea

[urz13]

Thing is though, we'd lose out on Federici's distribution.

[Ian Royal]

Thing is though, we'd lose out on Federici's distribution.

Distribution is nice, but not that important. And remember that whilst Fed's distribution has doubtless contributed to us scoring goals, it's also cost us at least two.

[leon]

christ 1.5M? Hold out for 4M minimum...

[urz13]

Thing is though, we'd lose out on Federici's distribution.

Distribution is nice, but not that important. And remember that whilst Fed's distribution has doubtless contributed to us scoring goals, it's also cost us at least two.

Id say he's contributed in at least 7 goals this season (HRK vs Palace stands out), so I'd take that even if it meant 2 mistakes which cost us a goal.

[fester_royal]

I don't see Feds going to Swansea tbh but as much as I think he's a good goalie I think we could cope without him. I can't see us keeping four keepers on our books for much longer, especially with two young internationals with growing reputations.

[Friday's Legacy]

I don't see Feds going to Swansea tbh but as much as I think he's a good goalie I think we could cope without him. I can't see us keeping four keepers on our books for much longer, especially with two young internationals with growing reputations.

hamer has been told he can leave and that will take us back down to three keepers, but young simon locke will step up and continue his development under sal bibbo.

[paulholsgrove]

Pure speculation but either wigan or villa may be on the look out, both are battling for al habsi, who ever loses out may well look at fed as I think he has a similar style to al habsi.