RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

1138 posts
User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by southbank1871 » 29 Jan 2013 13:21

Tokyo Sex Whale
southbank1871 I think anyone doubting the club's appetite for spending serious cash on the right player should probably STFU shouldn't they?


Yeah, when we actually buy a player.

I could go and offer £15m now for a house that's on the market for £25m; doesn't mean I have/or am willing to spend it. It would just placate my nagging wife in the short term as she stupidly thinks I have the intention of buying a huge house.

N.B - I dont have £15m, or a wife. Unfortunately.

For football just replace house with player and wife with mongdiv supporter.


So you don't think Reading had any intention of spending £7m, but made a bid well below what they knew Blackpool would accept, in order to plac8 Big Ern, cmonurz and jellytot?

User avatar
MouldyRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1830
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 16:19
Location: 54-46 that's my number

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by MouldyRoyal » 29 Jan 2013 13:24

It's a ridiculous analogy anyway as players (unless transfer listed) are not publicly advertised for sale at a certain price.

It would be laughably naive to assume we'd bid an amount for a player that we weren't actually prepared to pay to stop a bunch of fans from whinging.
Last edited by MouldyRoyal on 29 Jan 2013 13:28, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by southbank1871 » 29 Jan 2013 13:24

Tokyo Sex Whale No, i'm not saying that. I am saying we don't know the full details of the offer.

So, what I am saying is - Until we actually spend some money I think those moaning that we haven't spent the money are within their rights to do so.


In your house buying analogy you are saying just that.

User avatar
The Rouge
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Giving it the Double Djokovic

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by The Rouge » 29 Jan 2013 13:27

Sorry TSW - agree with Southbankers here.

User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by southbank1871 » 29 Jan 2013 13:29

I'm just glad they rejected the bid tbh, otherwise it could have all got a bit embarrassing when they actually asked for the money.


Royals-lad14
Member
Posts: 645
Joined: 05 Feb 2010 21:07

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by Royals-lad14 » 29 Jan 2013 13:29

now can we put in a cheeky loan offer for gylfi? :wink:

royaldownunder
Member
Posts: 208
Joined: 07 Aug 2006 05:58

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by royaldownunder » 29 Jan 2013 13:30

southbank1871
Tokyo Sex Whale
southbank1871 I think anyone doubting the club's appetite for spending serious cash on the right player should probably STFU shouldn't they?


Yeah, when we actually buy a player.

I could go and offer £15m now for a house that's on the market for £25m; doesn't mean I have/or am willing to spend it. It would just placate my nagging wife in the short term as she stupidly thinks I have the intention of buying a huge house.

N.B - I dont have £15m, or a wife. Unfortunately.

For football just replace house with player and wife with mongdiv supporter.


So you don't think Reading had any intention of spending £7m, but made a bid well below what they knew Blackpool would accept, in order to plac8 Big Ern, cmonurz and jellytot?

I thought the rejected bid was 6.6m yesterday and have made another bid for 8m this morning? Have they rejected it already?

User avatar
wingnut
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1631
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 16:19
Location: Metamorphosis

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by wingnut » 29 Jan 2013 13:32

Am I hearing it right that the bid's been rejected?

And that we've withdrawn the bid?

User avatar
Spirit of Elm Park
Member
Posts: 448
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 13:38
Location: Wiltshire - Past Swinedon thankfully

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by Spirit of Elm Park » 29 Jan 2013 13:34

My guess is by withdrawing offer, you hope to focus the players (ince) mind, and if he is keen to speak to us, he will slap in a transfer request, forcing Blackpools hand.


DOYLERSAROYALER
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1590
Joined: 27 Dec 2008 18:59

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by DOYLERSAROYALER » 29 Jan 2013 13:36

Tokyo Sex Whale I think it makes sense to make and publicly withdraw.

If we leave the bid on the table all it does it set a bar for other clubs to offer above. (Especially as we know a club like Liverpool may be interested)

By publicly withdrawing the offer it leaves less demand for the player and thus the price is less likely to be inflated above our original offer.

Swoop back in with an hour of deadline day left, make Jim White cum his pants and secure the player for a slight increase on our original offer.


:( :( :(
Last edited by DOYLERSAROYALER on 29 Jan 2013 13:39, edited 1 time in total.

royaldownunder
Member
Posts: 208
Joined: 07 Aug 2006 05:58

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by royaldownunder » 29 Jan 2013 13:37

Is there any confirmation that we've actually withdrawn our bid?

DOYLERSAROYALER
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1590
Joined: 27 Dec 2008 18:59

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by DOYLERSAROYALER » 29 Jan 2013 13:38

royaldownunder Is there any confirmation that we've actually withdrawn our bid?


Only the scrolling bar on SSN....Fordham will no doubt confirm in the coming hours :D

royalstu
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 24 Nov 2012 16:55

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by royalstu » 29 Jan 2013 13:39

royaldownunder Is there any confirmation that we've actually withdrawn our bid?


Nothing but SSN announcing it, I would not be surprised to see a bid go in late Wednesday night.

I think the only reason we have declared our interest is to disrupt the player, and put the PL idea in his head.


User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by Extended-Phenotype » 29 Jan 2013 13:40

Kudos for Blackpool turning down money and keeping their best players instead of grabbing the cheque and kicking folk out the door like they had AIDS.

User avatar
maffff
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5459
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 09:22

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by maffff » 29 Jan 2013 13:40

Reading given a slap on the wrist, negotiations to continue away from the media?

Cypry
Member
Posts: 995
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 13:32

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by Cypry » 29 Jan 2013 13:45

Of course, it's always possible that we have another target in mind, and by publicly ending our interest in Ince it demonstrates a commitment to A N Other (whoever that may be)?

royaldownunder
Member
Posts: 208
Joined: 07 Aug 2006 05:58

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by royaldownunder » 29 Jan 2013 13:46

Extended-Phenotype Kudos for Blackpool turning down money and keeping their best players instead of grabbing the cheque and kicking folk out the door like they had AIDS.

IMHO Blackpool are waiting right to the end of the window to see how much they can get, I imagine this will go down to the final wee hours… If we have withdrawn, it's just so BP can't keep pushing the price up, and BMD going public is merely to turn Inces head at the thought of playing in the Prem. I doubt Rodgers is seriously interested as they have Coutinho now... just hope Arry or Southampton (who seem to be after an attacking mid) don't swoop in

User avatar
Ouroboros
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3691
Joined: 17 Jan 2013 23:40

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by Ouroboros » 29 Jan 2013 13:47

southbank1871 I think anyone doubting the club's appetite for spending serious cash on the right player should probably STFU shouldn't they?


This.

A bit :shock: at the whole thing, really.

A bit gutting that when we find a player we're willing to spend £8m on we can't close the deal. Oh well.

User avatar
Ouroboros
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3691
Joined: 17 Jan 2013 23:40

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by Ouroboros » 29 Jan 2013 13:50

jellytot We probably knew that our offer would fail. Will be interesting to see if we have another go.
Perhaps ince has said no to us? Imagine if they had accepted! Hammond
Would have had heart failure!!


You whinge on and on and on about how we're not prepared to spend any money. Then we bid £8m for a player and you make out that we don't expect or want it to be accepted.

You are a bloody fool and a timewaster and you need to fuck off from this site, please.

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: RUMOUR - Thomas Ince

by Royal With Cheese » 29 Jan 2013 13:52

Ouroboros A bit gutting that when we find a player we're willing to spend £8m on we can't close the deal. Oh well.

If that's what actually happened.

I don't think we're willing to spend 8 million on anyone - especially a Championship player.

1138 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 33 guests

It is currently 22 Nov 2024 02:31