noelgallagher As it stands, RFC have placed the highest bid, Forest haven't matched it and unless they do so by Friday then he will go to the highest bidders.
Not if Hobbs himself doesn't want to join them he won't.
by Platypuss » 13 Jan 2014 22:11
noelgallagher As it stands, RFC have placed the highest bid, Forest haven't matched it and unless they do so by Friday then he will go to the highest bidders.
by jellytot » 13 Jan 2014 22:16
by MmmMonsterMunch » 13 Jan 2014 22:17
by noelgallagher » 13 Jan 2014 22:17
Platypussnoelgallagher As it stands, RFC have placed the highest bid, Forest haven't matched it and unless they do so by Friday then he will go to the highest bidders.
Not if Hobbs himself doesn't want to join them he won't.
by jellytot » 13 Jan 2014 22:20
by noelgallagher » 13 Jan 2014 22:24
jellytot Watts saying that RFC have not held talks with him today, but that Forest have not met our offer yet! What if Forest cannot afford to match us and the player doesn't want to join us?
by Ian Royal » 13 Jan 2014 22:35
noelgallagherjellytot Watts saying that RFC have not held talks with him today, but that Forest have not met our offer yet! What if Forest cannot afford to match us and the player doesn't want to join us?
Then Hull lose out on a potential £600k and Forest gain a CB on a free. Unless of course a PL team come in and offer a better deal. Again, this nonsense of Hobbs having allegiance to Forest is their supporters hoping he does!
by andrew1957 » 13 Jan 2014 22:39
by loyalroyal4life » 13 Jan 2014 22:57
by Unphased Royal » 13 Jan 2014 23:03
by Platypuss » 13 Jan 2014 23:06
Unphased Royal If they don't match our offer there is very little reason I can see that he would tell us to do one.
by Unphased Royal » 13 Jan 2014 23:14
PlatypussUnphased Royal If they don't match our offer there is very little reason I can see that he would tell us to do one.
One of those reasons posted just before you.
by Cypry » 14 Jan 2014 06:49
loyalroyal4life Anyone think this may be a move on part of club to show the fans we are 'active'?
Calculated move in that we never really expected to get him and forest had him all along?
by Terminal Boardom » 14 Jan 2014 08:04
Cypryloyalroyal4life Anyone think this may be a move on part of club to show the fans we are 'active'?
Calculated move in that we never really expected to get him and forest had him all along?
What, so we told Bruce to go public with our bid?
Do behave....why is it some will try every angle to discredit the club? Loyal my arse.....
by Pepe the Horseman » 14 Jan 2014 08:19
by Elm Park Pasty » 14 Jan 2014 08:29
loyalroyal4life Anyone think this may be a move on part of club to show the fans we are 'active'?
Calculated move in that we never really expected to get him and forest had him all along?
by Cypry » 14 Jan 2014 08:32
Terminal BoardomCypryloyalroyal4life Anyone think this may be a move on part of club to show the fans we are 'active'?
Calculated move in that we never really expected to get him and forest had him all along?
What, so we told Bruce to go public with our bid?
Do behave....why is it some will try every angle to discredit the club? Loyal my arse.....
To be fair to LR4L, he /she may have a point. Lets look at some facts...
The fans are pissed off with the way the AZ takeover has gone tits up
The football has been generally shit
The Manager isn't universally popular
What better way to get fans onside but to go public on a deal that just might not come off?
by No Hoops » 14 Jan 2014 08:35
jellytot The next few days will be interesting. I am more anxious for news on the takeover to be honest. I do not think we would be bidding at all if the ownership issue wasn't settled.
by Terminal Boardom » 14 Jan 2014 09:04
Pepe the Horseman "I know what will get these fans on our side, a fake £600k bid for an injured defender"
by MouldyRoyal » 14 Jan 2014 09:22
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests