Extended-Phenotype This cock dance is detracting from the fact that AZ definitely has a drugs problem.
Given some of our performances at home I'd thought most of us have felt need of artificial stimulants this year
by Nameless » 09 May 2014 13:02
Extended-Phenotype This cock dance is detracting from the fact that AZ definitely has a drugs problem.
by Ian Royal » 09 May 2014 16:19
Poker Bum From what I hear NAMELESS is a first prize oxf*rd!! Shooting me down when u don't know oxf*rd all. I'll start my post with from what I hear as I was told from a reliable source. What I say is very near the truth but cos of twats like u will not post anymore. Get your head out of your arse NAMELESS
by paultheroyal » 09 May 2014 16:49
NamelessPoker Bum From what I hear NAMELESS is a first prize oxf*rd!! Shooting me down when u don't know oxf*rd all. I'll start my post with from what I hear as I was told from a reliable source. What I say is very near the truth but cos of twats like u will not post anymore. Get your head out of your arse NAMELESS
Ha,ha,ha !
Funny how every crazy has a 'reliable' source.
Post as often as you like but show some respect and allow others to disagree with you.
Your original post had as many holes as our defence, sorry if pointing that out offends.....
by West Stand Flash » 09 May 2014 17:17
Nameless On the contrary, anyone can post any rubbish they like (see any contribution from WSF).
But at the same time anyone else can point out reasons why that post may not be accurate, sensible or logical
It's called free speech, got a problem with that WSF ?
by Eaststandman » 09 May 2014 18:06
Geekins From what i hear all my posts are shit.
by MeMeMe » 09 May 2014 18:19
by Mr Angry » 09 May 2014 21:35
by AthleticoSpizz » 09 May 2014 21:47
by Royal Rother » 09 May 2014 21:56
Hoop Blah It's what they do though. They effectively mortgage the guaranteed future income and bung on a heavy interest rate to make their profit.
by SpaceCruiser » 09 May 2014 23:38
Mr Angry There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that RFC will go into administration, anymore than pretty well any club that any poster would care to name, and far less likely than a great many (Bolton for example), and outside this forum nobody else is even whispering it (journos for example).
Those suggesting that they are somehow in possession of facts or information to the contrary are, of course, making it up.
Clearly the ownership situation is a nightmare at the moment, but making stuff up and trolling really doesn't help. Also, I wonder how many of those bleating on about the 'fact' that we are going into administration were part of the 'on the pitch' twatteratti from last Saturday? (My guess would be a pretty high number).
by Mr Angry » 10 May 2014 00:17
AthleticoSpizz Agree Mr A
However, (assuming that was you wearing your distinctive shirt, sat in your usual place) you were no longer visible during the "lap of appreciation"
You weren't on the pitch.........were you?
by Hoop Blah » 10 May 2014 10:03
Royal RotherHoop Blah It's what they do though. They effectively mortgage the guaranteed future income and bung on a heavy interest rate to make their profit.
What? Advance £20m against future revenue of £23m?
Sorry, as I keep saying, I just don't believe it.
by Royal Rother » 10 May 2014 10:49
by SpaceCruiser » 10 May 2014 11:08
Poker Bum From what I hear NAMELESS is a first prize oxf*rd!! Shooting me down when u don't know oxf*rd all. I'll start my post with from what I hear as I was told from a reliable source. What I say is very near the truth but cos of twats like u will not post anymore. Get your head out of your arse NAMELESS
by Uke » 10 May 2014 11:15
Extended-Phenotype This cock dance is detracting from the fact that AZ definitely has a drugs problem.
by Mr Angry » 10 May 2014 13:04
by 3points » 11 May 2014 11:04
Royal RotherHoop Blah It's what they do though. They effectively mortgage the guaranteed future income and bung on a heavy interest rate to make their profit.
What? Advance £20m against future revenue of £23m?
Sorry, as I keep saying, I just don't believe it.
by SydenhamRoyal » 11 May 2014 11:30
Mr Angry There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that RFC will go into administration, anymore than pretty well any club that any poster would care to name, and far less likely than a great many (Bolton for example), and outside this forum nobody else is even whispering it (journos for example).
Those suggesting that they are somehow in possession of facts or information to the contrary are, of course, making it up.
Clearly the ownership situation is a nightmare at the moment, but making stuff up and trolling really doesn't help. Also, I wonder how many of those bleating on about the 'fact' that we are going into administration were part of the 'on the pitch' twatteratti from last Saturday? (My guess would be a pretty high number).
by Royal Rother » 11 May 2014 13:11
3pointsRoyal RotherHoop Blah It's what they do though. They effectively mortgage the guaranteed future income and bung on a heavy interest rate to make their profit.
What? Advance £20m against future revenue of £23m?
Sorry, as I keep saying, I just don't believe it.
RR - quite simple. The club has signed a deed of assignment for the PL money, and there's a charge over the rest of the club's assets. The deed of assignment effectively moves the credit risk away from the football club onto the Premier League. So the risk of non-payment is virtually nil. You assess the risk on the entity that actually pays the money - happens all the time in the world of debt finance. The Vibrac security loan docs and deed of assignment are all registered at Companies House
by multisync1830 » 11 May 2014 13:12
SydenhamRoyal
I don't believe the club either will, or is at risk, of going into administration, but I have heard that there is a risk, and this via someone very close to the Board. s.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests