Speculation : Shane Long to return

598 posts
User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12280
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Maguire » 01 May 2012 13:43

This discussion is unbelieveably childish

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Simon's Church » 01 May 2012 14:25

So's your face.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Royal Lady » 01 May 2012 14:29

Maguire This discussion is unbelieveably childish

I don't know why I bother really. You state an opinion and then half a dozen divs tell you that you're OPINION is wrong. FFS.

Come back Spacey, all is forgiven.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Extended-Phenotype » 01 May 2012 16:04

Z175
"Shane will be wearing number 99 with the name, "Big Pea" on the back"...



Big Pea Long.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Ian Royal » 01 May 2012 16:08

Royal Lady
Maguire This discussion is unbelieveably childish

I don't know why I bother really. You state an opinion and then half a dozen divs tell you that you're OPINION is wrong. FFS.

Come back Spacey, all is forgiven.

It's probably because your opinion is consistently not just wrong, but utterly ill-conceived.

Well done on finding one opinion I've given which could be stupid by the way.


User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Extended-Phenotype » 01 May 2012 16:10

Big Pea Long.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Royal Lady » 01 May 2012 18:29

Ian Royal
Royal Lady
Maguire This discussion is unbelieveably childish

I don't know why I bother really. You state an opinion and then half a dozen divs tell you that you're OPINION is wrong. FFS.

Come back Spacey, all is forgiven.

It's probably because your opinion is consistently not just wrong, but utterly ill-conceived.

Well done on finding one opinion I've given which could be stupid by the way.

How can you have a wrong "opinion" you utter 'tard. It's an opinion. Definition: 1.A view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge

User avatar
Ups and Downs
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1466
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 11:33
Location: the piss artist not formerly known as scutterbucket

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Ups and Downs » 01 May 2012 18:38

I'm not saying that I disagree with whatever you're opinion was, RL, in fact I haven't even read the previous page, but surely people's opinions can be wrong?

For instance, if I said "it is my opinion that dog shit tastes just like Mars Bars and everyone should try one" I'm sure people could say that opinion was incorrect.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Royal Lady » 02 May 2012 07:33

Because it is a proven fact that dog turd doesn't taste like chocolate - I presume! LOlz etc.

There are different types of opinion. My type of opinion cannot be proved wrong or right. I'm not even trying to bulldoze people into believing I'm right - I'm just saying that my opinion is that Shane Long was better for RFC than any of Cywka, Connolly or Afobe.


User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12280
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Maguire » 02 May 2012 07:49

Ups and Downs For instance, if I said "it is my opinion that dog shit tastes just like Mars Bars and everyone should try one" I'm sure people could say that opinion was incorrect.


Only if they try eating dog shit though.

So what we're saying here is Ian Royal eats dog shit?

User avatar
Ups and Downs
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1466
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 11:33
Location: the piss artist not formerly known as scutterbucket

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Ups and Downs » 02 May 2012 08:15

Royal Lady Because it is a proven fact that dog turd doesn't taste like chocolate - I presume! LOlz etc.

There are different types of opinion. My type of opinion cannot be proved wrong or right. I'm not even trying to bulldoze people into believing I'm right - I'm just saying that my opinion is that Shane Long was better for RFC than any of Cywka, Connolly or Afobe.


Yes it doesn't I'm sure, but if someone said that they thought it did then they could argue that it was their opinion and it would be difficult to prove that to them it didn't taste like chocolate, however ridiculous it sounded.

Shane, was better last year and in previous years, but I think to suggest that his one game this year was more important than Connollys involvement in 5 wins is utter Mars Bars.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Extended-Phenotype » 02 May 2012 09:26

Yeah, but Big Pea Long?

What...I mean, Big Pea Long?

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Royal Lady » 02 May 2012 09:47

Ups and Downs
Royal Lady Because it is a proven fact that dog turd doesn't taste like chocolate - I presume! LOlz etc.

There are different types of opinion. My type of opinion cannot be proved wrong or right. I'm not even trying to bulldoze people into believing I'm right - I'm just saying that my opinion is that Shane Long was better for RFC than any of Cywka, Connolly or Afobe.


Yes it doesn't I'm sure, but if someone said that they thought it did then they could argue that it was their opinion and it would be difficult to prove that to them it didn't taste like chocolate, however ridiculous it sounded.

Shane, was better last year and in previous years, but I think to suggest that his one game this year was more important than Connollys involvement in 5 wins is utter Mars Bars.

Yeah but I've changed tack a bit now m8 - I'm doing a frim and moving the goalposts to say he was more important to the team when he was with us, than Connolly, Afobe and Cywka have been. :wink: :lol:


User avatar
Ups and Downs
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1466
Joined: 16 Nov 2005 11:33
Location: the piss artist not formerly known as scutterbucket

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Ups and Downs » 02 May 2012 10:07

In that case your opinion is 100% correct.

User avatar
dogzbollox
Member
Posts: 646
Joined: 30 Aug 2010 13:39

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by dogzbollox » 02 May 2012 10:09

Extended-Phenotype Yeah, but Big Pea Long?

What...I mean, Big Pea Long?


Well it's better than Big Long Pea don't you think?

JimmytheJim
Member
Posts: 637
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 17:20
Location: Mexico

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by JimmytheJim » 02 May 2012 10:51

Opinions are not immune to criticism.

It is bizarre to imply that they are.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Extended-Phenotype » 02 May 2012 11:12

My favourite superhero Deaf Man is immune to criticism. That's what pisses The Critic off so much.

Man, that Critic. What a loser.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Royal Lady » 02 May 2012 11:22

JimmytheJim Opinions are not immune to criticism.

It is bizarre to imply that they are.

:roll: You may criticise an opinion - but you can't say an OPINION is wrong! Because it's a personal opinion.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5977
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by Extended-Phenotype » 02 May 2012 13:08

What the f/ck? Of course an opinion can be wrong.

In my opinion, United will still win the Premier League. Quick everyone, put a bet on because I can't be wrong!

JimmytheJim
Member
Posts: 637
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 17:20
Location: Mexico

Re: Speculation : Shane Long to return

by JimmytheJim » 02 May 2012 13:46

Royal Lady
JimmytheJim Opinions are not immune to criticism.

It is bizarre to imply that they are.

:roll: You may criticise an opinion - but you can't say an OPINION is wrong! Because it's a personal opinion.


If it is my opinion that all of the world leaders are giant lizards disguised as humans, then you are well within your right tell me that my opinion is wrong. Any opinion which asserts a fact can be wrong, if the fact it asserts is wrong.

On matters of taste and aesthetics it becomes a bit hazier, but it is very definitely possible (and frequently necessary) to criticise an opinion for being wrong or praise it for being right.

If you want your opinions to be completely disassociated from facts, then it is quite likely that you'll spend a lot of your life being told that your opinions are wrong, or stupid.

"You" refers to "one", rather than you specifically, RL, by the way.

598 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 72 guests

It is currently 09 May 2025 16:19