by Ian Royal » 07 May 2014 22:45
by Royal Rother » 07 May 2014 23:01
by Poker Bum » 09 May 2014 04:48
by Reading4eva » 09 May 2014 08:17
by Nameless » 09 May 2014 09:03
Poker Bum From what i hear AZ liked to spend the clubs money on abit of posh up his nose until his daddy BZ found out and this is why he has not been seen.. Daddy pulled the plug on his sons little cartel but BZ will see the club through until a new owner is found.. But basically AZ is in Russia so daddy can keep an eye on him.
by West Stand Flash » 09 May 2014 09:04
NamelessPoker Bum From what i hear AZ liked to spend the clubs money on abit of posh up his nose until his daddy BZ found out and this is why he has not been seen.. Daddy pulled the plug on his sons little cartel but BZ will see the club through until a new owner is found.. But basically AZ is in Russia so daddy can keep an eye on him.
1. Any post that starts 'from what I hear' is branded as nonsense from the start
2. Accusing someone of drug taking and theft when you have no evidence is rarely a good idea, if you research BZ' s background you may decide it's even less of a clever thing to do
3. The suggestion that BZ and AZ fell out so BZ pulled the plug but has still underwritten things has widely circulated for ages
4. Why have you described RFC as a cartel ?do you know what a cartel is ?
by tidus_mi2 » 09 May 2014 09:10
West Stand FlashNamelessPoker Bum From what i hear AZ liked to spend the clubs money on abit of posh up his nose until his daddy BZ found out and this is why he has not been seen.. Daddy pulled the plug on his sons little cartel but BZ will see the club through until a new owner is found.. But basically AZ is in Russia so daddy can keep an eye on him.
1. Any post that starts 'from what I hear' is branded as nonsense from the start
2. Accusing someone of drug taking and theft when you have no evidence is rarely a good idea, if you research BZ' s background you may decide it's even less of a clever thing to do
3. The suggestion that BZ and AZ fell out so BZ pulled the plug but has still underwritten things has widely circulated for ages
4. Why have you described RFC as a cartel ?do you know what a cartel is ?
And here we have the Hobnob Police![]()
by Nameless » 09 May 2014 09:12
by Geekins » 09 May 2014 09:14
by tidus_mi2 » 09 May 2014 09:25
Nameless On the contrary, anyone can post any rubbish they like (see any contribution from WSF).
But at the same time anyone else can point out reasons why that post may not be accurate, sensible or logical
It's called free speech, got a problem with that WSF ?
by melonhead » 09 May 2014 10:02
by Pepe the Horseman » 09 May 2014 10:17
by Hoop Blah » 09 May 2014 10:18
Royal Rother Maybe the mysterious Vibrac is actually owned and funded by Sir Dave Richards and his cronies at the PL, and when they hear of a club in difficulties they get someone to drop the name Vibrac into a conversation and see what happens...
Damned if they'll make the parachutes available in instalments with that little earner!
It's all part of a master plan!
by Hoop Blah » 09 May 2014 10:20
Ian Royal Happy to have been corrected, but I thought from the whole Portsmouth saga that parachute payments were made in about two or three installments through the year. One towards the start of the season, one about halfway through and the balance at the end.
Agree with Hoop, it's lunacy to withhold until the end of the year when players are paid monthly. It just pushes clubs into desperation borrowing and being screwed over with interest.
I'd also agree with would be lunacy to pay it upfront as you know what some of the crazies would do and it wouldn't be bank it to pay existing wages and debts.
by Royal Rother » 09 May 2014 11:09
Hoop BlahRoyal Rother Maybe the mysterious Vibrac is actually owned and funded by Sir Dave Richards and his cronies at the PL, and when they hear of a club in difficulties they get someone to drop the name Vibrac into a conversation and see what happens...
Damned if they'll make the parachutes available in instalments with that little earner!
It's all part of a master plan!
So we're agreed that it's a murky world where the need for a water tight business plan is irrelevant if the clubs are willing to sign away their payments for a 10% interest rate?
by Hoop Blah » 09 May 2014 12:01
by Poker Bum » 09 May 2014 12:53
by Extended-Phenotype » 09 May 2014 12:58
by Nameless » 09 May 2014 13:00
Poker Bum From what I hear NAMELESS is a first prize oxf*rd!! Shooting me down when u don't know oxf*rd all. I'll start my post with from what I hear as I was told from a reliable source. What I say is very near the truth but cos of twats like u will not post anymore. Get your head out of your arse NAMELESS
by tidus_mi2 » 09 May 2014 13:01
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests