Rumour- Kris Commons swap deal for Matejovsky

[Ian Royal]

I'd rather keep Matejovsky. Don't know why people don't like him. Ok, he may be inconsistent at times, but if he plays like he did at Bristol City on a regular basis, we'll stay up.

Because:
He's almost certainly on expensive wages.
He's likely to go for one of the higher transfer fees in the squad.
He plays in a position we have plenty of talent and cover already.
He is inconsistent and a luxury player.

He won't play like he did at Bristol City every game though. That I absolutely guarantee you.

[Dirk Gently]

When on top form, he is by far the best player at the club.

There's no doubting that, but what's much more important than how good players are is how effective they are, and he's not proved to be particularly effective for us in any match.

[rg6royal]

Would definitely take this!

[gazzer, loyal royal]

if Marek is to leave it will be to the premier league or back to the Czech Republic

[Royal_Delight]

I'd rather keep Matejovsky. Don't know why people don't like him. Ok, he may be inconsistent at times, but if he plays like he did at Bristol City on a regular basis, we'll stay up.

Because:
He's almost certainly on expensive wages.
He's likely to go for one of the higher transfer fees in the squad.
He plays in a position we have plenty of talent and cover already.
He is inconsistent and a luxury player.

He won't play like he did at Bristol City every game though. That I absolutely guarantee you.

If he doesn't go by this transfer window, he will definitely be gone by the next one. The club simply cannot afford to keep him.

[Terminal Boardom]

Whether it is a swap deal for Kris Commons or Wimbledon Common, I would get rid of Matejovsky. He has had more chances than Graeme Hick and Mark Ramprakash combined. Potential is one thing. He just hasn't delivered and in our current predicament he is not worth a place in the starting XI. Crissakes, he had enough of a chance in the Prem and did feck all then.

And in all seriousness, who in the Prem would want to sign him? What would be the justification??? If roles were reversed and we were in the prem would we want to buy him from a bottom 3 Championship club? REALLY??? Thought not.

[Royalwaster]

When on top form, he is by far the best player at the club.

This goes down with the pathetic excuses for Rodgers' results, "on another day we would have won", yet this fabled "other day" never seemed to come, did it?
Same thing with Matejovsky, everyone on the Matejovsky-waknfest-team keep harping on about how he will be so fantastic when he is on form, yet that day never seems to come, at best he has performed in one out of ten matches, barely even that.
It has been one endless procession of flattering to deceive, and it just drags on and on and on.
The sooner we are rid of this joker, the sooner we can bring in someone who can actually do a decent job on a regular basis.

I don't hear anyone saying that he WILL be fantastic when he is on form - just that he is a very good player, who could be very effective with strikers in front of him who are better at reading his through balls and have got the pace to run onto them. Truth is in any other team he'd already have 10+ assists.

[Terminal Boardom]

He is a good player. However, he is not a good player for us.

[Ferris]

He is a good player. However, he is not a good player for us.

This.

[andrew1957]

He is a good player. However, he is not a good player for us.

+1 - the sooner he goes the better so people on here can stop saying how wonderful he is when he rarely ever creates anything or scores a goal.

[W&E Royal]

(Matejovsky)... could be very effective with strikers in front of him who are better at reading his through balls and have got the pace to run onto them. Truth is in any other team he'd already have 10+ assists.

Oh Boy, here we go again with the excuses.
It is everyone elses fault that he can't pass to anyone except his opposition, yes everyone else are just too damn stupid to understand what he's thinking, that has to be it. It could never be that he has no concentration and will misplace the simplest ball,
and it could never be that he dallies on the ball, takes too much time and hasn't got the awareness needed to play in this high-tempo league, only being suited to Czech football or german division two where he would have more time on the ball?
It could never be that he simply is not good enough? NO? That can't be it?

I am just so tired of these lame ass excuses. Just give it up, the guy has been a failure, simple as that.

Ideal, other than Ian Royal, you are my hero.

[1871royals]

Im glad everyone else sees how overrated Marek is.

This season been given a regular run and has contributed 0 goals and 1 assist.

For a "creative" midfielder that is shocking. His passing can be awesome, but it doesnt help us as no one else can read it.

[Ian Royal]

(Matejovsky)... could be very effective with strikers in front of him who are better at reading his through balls and have got the pace to run onto them. Truth is in any other team he'd already have 10+ assists.

Oh Boy, here we go again with the excuses.
It is everyone elses fault that he can't pass to anyone except his opposition, yes everyone else are just too damn stupid to understand what he's thinking, that has to be it. It could never be that he has no concentration and will misplace the simplest ball,
and it could never be that he dallies on the ball, takes too much time and hasn't got the awareness needed to play in this high-tempo league, only being suited to Czech football or german division two where he would have more time on the ball?
It could never be that he simply is not good enough? NO? That can't be it?

I am just so tired of these lame ass excuses. Just give it up, the guy has been a failure, simple as that.

Ideal, other than Ian Royal, you are my hero.

I find that very insulting.

[W&E Royal]

I find that very insulting.

Sorry Ian, no offence was meant.

[BR2]

I've had a look on there forums and the only Commons rumour is that he's off to Forest.

Doubtful, they hate him. They sang anti- commons chants throughout the game on saturday.

Don't you think that might be because he used to play for them?

[LoyalRoyalFan]

Matejovsky is the only player, who can play those intelligent through-balls, which our strikers can't read. He is the creative spark in our team, that we need to keep. Regardless of his inconsistency.

[Dirk Gently]

Matejovsky is the only player, who can play those intelligent through-balls, which our strikers can't read. He is the creative spark in our team, that we need to keep. Regardless of his inconsistency.

So the goals at Barnsley from Jem Karacan's intelligent through-balls, and all the intelligent through-balls that Jem Karacan played at Anfield were all figments of my imagination, were they?

And Jem is far more effective and consistent - and he can tackle, too!

[LoyalRoyalFan]

Matejovsky is the only player, who can play those intelligent through-balls, which our strikers can't read. He is the creative spark in our team, that we need to keep. Regardless of his inconsistency.

So the goals at Barnsley from Jem Karacan's intelligent through-balls, and all the intelligent through-balls that Jem Karacan played at Anfield were all figments of my imagination, were they?

And Jem is far more effective and consistent - and he can tackle, too!

For me Karacan, doesn't do that enough. Matejovsky has proven he can be the creative spark in our team and now he needs to do that more often.

[Dirk Gently]

Matejovsky is the only player, who can play those intelligent through-balls, which our strikers can't read. He is the creative spark in our team, that we need to keep. Regardless of his inconsistency.

So the goals at Barnsley from Jem Karacan's intelligent through-balls, and all the intelligent through-balls that Jem Karacan played at Anfield were all figments of my imagination, were they?

And Jem is far more effective and consistent - and he can tackle, too!

For me Karacan, doesn't do that enough. Matejovsky has proven he can be the creative spark in our team and now he needs to do that more often.

Karacan's only had the chance to play that role once or twice, and he's not disappointed either time. Matejovsky has had countless chances and only delivered once or twice.

Don't get me wrong, Matejovsky is our most skillful player - but he doesn't deliver that skill, so he's just not effective. I'd go for a less skillful player who consistently and effectively delivers any day of the week!

[LoyalRoyalFan]

I agree that Karacan is a fantastic young talent. However, I don't think we should let go of Matejovsky because for me he is a vital part of the team.