RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

353 posts
User avatar
Chuckle Brother
Member
Posts: 574
Joined: 11 May 2006 09:50

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Chuckle Brother » 25 Jan 2009 14:58

The 17 Bus Having now seen a photo of Laura i think we should double the offer, her prescence would brighten up the West a lot.


Not married either so obviously a bit of a slapper.

Maybe treble it.

User avatar
royalrumble
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 41
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:54
Location: Thinking Positive Thoughts

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by royalrumble » 02 Apr 2009 17:53

Southampton future 'in jeopardy'


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/southampton/7976473.stm

Sad for Southampton but now should be cheaper to get him.

toppy
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 514
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:51
Location: The right side of the bank!!

Andrew Surman

by toppy » 30 Apr 2009 08:43

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... -21319887/


Sur gets Royal call


30/04/2009

Football Spy

Andrew Surman will be the first big name departure from Southampton - in a £2million summer move to Reading.

Reading boss Steve Coppell is a big fan of the England Under-21 who will quit St Mary's after the club's relegation to League One.

Everton and Aston Villa have also been monitoring the form of the midfielder (above), along with Fulham boss Roy Hodgson..

IMAMATEOFJOVSKY
Member
Posts: 757
Joined: 03 Feb 2008 13:42

Re: Andrew Surman

by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 30 Apr 2009 09:36

More regurgitated tosh from the press - no one knows (certainly not the Daily Mirror!) if Coppell will even be at club next season

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20160
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: Andrew Surman

by Stranded » 30 Apr 2009 09:52

Similar story in The Sun with no mention of Coppell..


User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Andrew Surman

by Hoop Blah » 30 Apr 2009 10:10

Can we have Lallana (or whatever his name is) as well please?

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 30 Apr 2009 11:23

£2m?? Only if we're promoted then!

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Andrew Surman

by Ian Royal » 30 Apr 2009 12:04

Deathy £2m?? Only if we're promoted then!


YAWN. Same Jay, same mindless bullshit.


Surman is the sort of player we might go for if the opportunity arose regardless of Coppell's decision. Remember that Hammond plays a big part in identifying players and signing them. He may think it's worth going ahead with at that price regardless.

Although £2m seems a lot given Saints financial situation and relegation.

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 30 Apr 2009 12:28

Ian Royal
Deathy £2m?? Only if we're promoted then!


YAWN. Same Jay, same mindless bullshit.


Surman is the sort of player we might go for if the opportunity arose regardless of Coppell's decision. Remember that Hammond plays a big part in identifying players and signing them. He may think it's worth going ahead with at that price regardless.

Although £2m seems a lot given Saints financial situation and relegation.


You're so easy!!

But you're also a fool if you think Reading will sign anyone for money like that if we stay down. Money if anything will be tighter than ever this summer!

Crack a smile, shock me!


User avatar
SteveRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2441
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 17:48

Re: Andrew Surman

by SteveRoyal » 30 Apr 2009 13:44

Wasn't it this January that everyone was calling for us to sign him?
What is this thread's stance, I'm getting mixed signals.

Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: Andrew Surman

by Sun Tzu » 30 Apr 2009 14:11

We'll rake in huge sums in transfers if we don;t go up.

And we'll be into a major rebuilding phase.

I don;t think we'll spend 4 or 5 million on a player but 2 million is no big deal these days, especially for a very good youngster.

We shall see - but £4 million for Hunt with 50% on a replacement sounds like sound business to me, and very different to finding the money from the ongoing budget.

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 30 Apr 2009 14:17

Sun Tzu We'll rake in huge sums in transfers if we don;t go up.

And we'll be into a major rebuilding phase.

I don;t think we'll spend 4 or 5 million on a player but 2 million is no big deal these days, especially for a very good youngster.

We shall see - but £4 million for Hunt with 50% on a replacement sounds like sound business to me, and very different to finding the money from the ongoing budget.


YAWN!

We made a lot this summer and spent what???

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20160
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: Andrew Surman

by Stranded » 30 Apr 2009 14:35

Stay down = New manager = new transfer policy = this being a possibility


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Andrew Surman

by Ian Royal » 30 Apr 2009 18:11

Deathy
Ian Royal
Deathy £2m?? Only if we're promoted then!


YAWN. Same Jay, same mindless bullshit.


Surman is the sort of player we might go for if the opportunity arose regardless of Coppell's decision. Remember that Hammond plays a big part in identifying players and signing them. He may think it's worth going ahead with at that price regardless.

Although £2m seems a lot given Saints financial situation and relegation.


You're so easy!!

But you're also a fool if you think Reading will sign anyone for money like that if we stay down. Money if anything will be tighter than ever this summer!

Crack a smile, shock me!


You're the negative near suicidal nancy. It's not me who needs to start smiling. I already am.

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 30 Apr 2009 20:03

Not in your photos you don't. :?

I'm not that negative. I play up to it a little. If anything I'm guilty of being too optimistic.

You wont see this football club spending £2m on anyone this summer if we remain in the Championship. I'd be delighted if that was actually our transfer budget.

gazzer, loyal royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1935
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 21:45
Location: Khalifa Cisse sleeps with the light on, not because he is afraid of the dark, but because the dark i

Re: Andrew Surman

by gazzer, loyal royal » 30 Apr 2009 20:07

would prefer mcgoldrick

13 goals from midfield in a team that got relegated

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Andrew Surman

by Terminal Boardom » 30 Apr 2009 20:08

Sun Tzu We'll rake in huge sums in transfers if we don;t go up.

And we'll be into a major rebuilding phase.

I don;t think we'll spend 4 or 5 million on a player but 2 million is no big deal these days, especially for a very good youngster.

We shall see - but £4 million for Hunt with 50% on a replacement sounds like sound business to me, and very different to finding the money from the ongoing budget.


Your definition of "huge sums" interests me. Which of our players fall into this category?

And, who, in their right minds, would spend £4m on shunt?

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Andrew Surman

by Terminal Boardom » 30 Apr 2009 20:09

gazzer, loyal royal would prefer mcgoldrick

13 goals from midfield in a team that got relegated


So McGoldrick, Surman and Lallana or whatever his name is are supposed to be half decent and worth a punt? If they are so o*ford good, how come southampton got relegated?

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 30 Apr 2009 20:24

Terminal Boardom
Sun Tzu We'll rake in huge sums in transfers if we don;t go up.

And we'll be into a major rebuilding phase.

I don;t think we'll spend 4 or 5 million on a player but 2 million is no big deal these days, especially for a very good youngster.

We shall see - but £4 million for Hunt with 50% on a replacement sounds like sound business to me, and very different to finding the money from the ongoing budget.


Your definition of "huge sums" interests me. Which of our players fall into this category?

And, who, in their right minds, would spend £4m on shunt?


Nobody. Only the likes of Wolves, Brum/Sheff Utd and the lower Prem sides would look at him too IMO. Bigger clubs have watched him and gone cold on him. He was poor 99% of this season and was worse last season.

If we were offered £2m for him this summer, bargain!

Doyle would go for in the region of £4m though. Although inconsistant, he has scored the goals this season but could have doubled that had he been in a team that actually played football.

But no way will we have a few million to play with this summer if we stay down. Look at last summer and the money from Kits and Shorey. Did we see it? Not really, no. But you'll never convince Behindu/Sun Tzu otherwise. Even though money will be even tighter!

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Andrew Surman

by Terminal Boardom » 30 Apr 2009 20:46

Deathy
Terminal Boardom Your definition of "huge sums" interests me. Which of our players fall into this category?

And, who, in their right minds, would spend £4m on shunt?


Nobody. Only the likes of Wolves, Brum/Sheff Utd and the lower Prem sides would look at him too IMO. Bigger clubs have watched him and gone cold on him. He was poor 99% of this season and was worse last season.

If we were offered £2m for him this summer, bargain!

Doyle would go for in the region of £4m though. Although inconsistant, he has scored the goals this season but could have doubled that had he been in a team that actually played football.

But no way will we have a few million to play with this summer if we stay down. Look at last summer and the money from Kits and Shorey. Did we see it? Not really, no. But you'll never convince Behindu/Sun Tzu otherwise. Even though money will be even tighter!


Doyler could go for around £6m to £9m. But who else could we expect to have poached? Money will be tighter next season as this recession bites further. However, if we are promoted I would expect more money to be spent this time as compared to last if only because this current squad is not as good and neither has it the strength in depth. The recession may actually be a blessing as agents become more realistic. Ooops, sorry, TB talking bollocks!!!

353 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

It is currently 19 Sep 2024 23:15