Big FootExtended-Phenotype Why?
Those you know, know
We will compare stories as probably different versions and sources.
by paultheroyal » 30 May 2012 16:02
Big FootExtended-Phenotype Why?
Those you know, know
by Big Foot » 30 May 2012 16:09
paultheroyalBig FootExtended-Phenotype Why?
Those you know, know
We will compare stories as probably different versions and sources.
by royalZILLAAA » 30 May 2012 16:50
Royal LadyPepe the HorsemanroyalZILLAAA I would literally shit a litter of kittens
Impossible.
I was just going to say that. People who use literally for literally everything should be shot. Quite literally.
by Royal Lady » 30 May 2012 16:54
by royalZILLAAA » 30 May 2012 17:05
Royal Lady Yeah but you made a stupid comment, which is, quite literally, impossible.
by royalZILLAAA » 30 May 2012 17:11
by Ian Royal » 30 May 2012 17:31
Extended-PhenotypeRoyal Lady
No you rude little man, it will mean that Big Foot is reliable with gossip/news won't it.
Your quaint 1940's village insults are actually quite arousing.
by Royal Lady » 30 May 2012 18:36
Ian RoyalExtended-PhenotypeRoyal Lady
No you rude little man, it will mean that Big Foot is reliable with gossip/news won't it.
Your quaint 1940's village insults are actually quite arousing.
I fukking love you man.
by who are ya? » 30 May 2012 18:43
by LoyalRoyalFan » 30 May 2012 18:52
who are ya? I can't think of Shane Long without watching this video tbf tbh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnCk9MDg-sc
by Big Foot » 30 May 2012 23:24
LoyalRoyalFanwho are ya? I can't think of Shane Long without watching this video tbf tbh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnCk9MDg-sc
The noise
by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 31 May 2012 06:55
who are ya? I can't think of Shane Long without watching this video tbf tbh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnCk9MDg-sc
by royalZILLAAA » 31 May 2012 11:12
Tommy Youlden's Earswho are ya? I can't think of Shane Long without watching this video tbf tbh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnCk9MDg-sc
Class.
Can we be greedy and have Shane+Sig. Please Mr Zing? Zingo. ZingDaddy.
by Maguire » 31 May 2012 11:24
by 3 veesinarow » 31 May 2012 11:50
royalZILLAAARoyal Lady Yeah but you made a stupid comment, which is, quite literally, impossible.
I'm sorry my rhetorical hyperbole went over your head.
by Royal Rother » 31 May 2012 11:55
Maguire Shane Long is rubbish, we can do better.
by Toon Toon Blue army » 31 May 2012 11:57
LoyalRoyalFanwho are ya? I can't think of Shane Long without watching this video tbf tbh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnCk9MDg-sc
The noise
by Royal Lady » 31 May 2012 12:00
3 veesinarowroyalZILLAAARoyal Lady Yeah but you made a stupid comment, which is, quite literally, impossible.
I'm sorry my rhetorical hyperbole went over your head.
Rhetorical hyperbole doesn't need the word "literally" to be effective, though. It is superfluous since the absurdism of the statement is apparent to a cognitive reader.
by Archie's penalty » 31 May 2012 12:15
by Extended-Phenotype » 31 May 2012 13:49
3 veesinarowroyalZILLAAARoyal Lady Yeah but you made a stupid comment, which is, quite literally, impossible.
I'm sorry my rhetorical hyperbole went over your head.
Rhetorical hyperbole doesn't need the word "literally" to be effective, though. It is superfluous since the absurdism of the statement is apparent to a cognitive reader.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests