SPECULATION - Sorensen wouldn't he be a quality purchase????

[SCIAG]

Sorensen= thid choice at Villa, behind Scott Carson and Stuart Taylor, neither of whom are that good.

Hahnemahn= First choice here, one of our best players.

No brainer.

[kwik-silva]

Sorensen= thid choice at Villa, behind Scott Carson and Stuart Taylor, neither of whom are that good.

Hahnemahn= First choice here, one of our best players.

No brainer.

Scott Carson has moved on, and he's a very good keeper.. except that one hideous mistake

anyway, it looks like he might be following kits to Stoke according to an article

[SCIAG]

Sorensen= thid choice at Villa, behind Scott Carson and Stuart Taylor, neither of whom are that good.

Hahnemahn= First choice here, one of our best players.

No brainer.

Scott Carson has moved on, and he's a very good keeper.. except that one hideous mistake

They released Sorensen before he returned to Liverpool.
They've signed Fridel and Guzan in any case, so it's irrelevant.

[Arch]

Given that, Stuart Taylor wouldn't be such a bad buy.

[Southbank Old Boy]

You never really know why a player is out of favour at a club so just because Sorenson didn't start ahead of others at times it doesn't mean he isn't a good purchase.

It wasn't too long ago that Marcus was playing second or even third fiddle at Fulham.

I think Sorenson is a very good keeper and has done a good job for Denmark and his clubs over here. He does make the odd howler but on a free transfer he'd be an good addition for us, but probably only if we'd stayed up.

[papereyes]

Villa, Man City and Everton especially will all be looking to build on their impressive starts and will be letting top players leave. We should be sniffing around like a starving vulture