RUMOUR - David Bell

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Southbank Old Boy » 29 Jun 2008 10:07

brendywendy
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe What I don't get about Kebe and never will.

How was a French lower league left winger, ever going to keep us up?


wenger has bought from lower french league before and found gems
and i think copps thought at the price he was worth a go regardless seeing as all other options were failing


Can you name one French lower league player that Wenger has bought over to come straight into his team to make any kind of positive impact?

I can't, and Wenger is the master of that market.

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Southbank Old Boy » 29 Jun 2008 10:30

brendywendy
i know you probably have one to hand, but i dont

so who were these great RW who were lining up to play for us?


Three names that were touted at the time, all of which I think would've been available, interested and an improvement on what we had, are Gera, Kightly and Routledge.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Ian Royal » 29 Jun 2008 18:48

Southbank Old Boy
brendywendy
i know you probably have one to hand, but i dont

so who were these great RW who were lining up to play for us?


Three names that were touted at the time, all of which I think would've been available, interested and an improvement on what we had, are Gera, Kightly and Routledge.


Weren't the only people touting Gera on here? As they do every season for the last 3 years. In which case I'll start touting Quersma every summer and January for a couple of years and then complain when something goes wrong that he was available, interested and an improvement on what we had.

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Southbank Old Boy » 29 Jun 2008 19:17

Ian Royal
Southbank Old Boy
brendywendy
i know you probably have one to hand, but i dont

so who were these great RW who were lining up to play for us?


Three names that were touted at the time, all of which I think would've been available, interested and an improvement on what we had, are Gera, Kightly and Routledge.


Weren't the only people touting Gera on here? As they do every season for the last 3 years. In which case I'll start touting Quersma every summer and January for a couple of years and then complain when something goes wrong that he was available, interested and an improvement on what we had.


Ah, very clever, what a wag you are.

The question was basically who was available, not who were we interested in and on the verge of signing. We might not've been interested in him, but the fact he's since gone to Fulham even when West Brom have gone up shows that he probably would've been interested in moving to a Premiership side in January.

If you want an answer to who were we interested in to fill the massive void we had on the rigth side of midfield you'll have to go and ask Coppell.

User avatar
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2851
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:46

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 29 Jun 2008 19:22

Ian Royal
Southbank Old Boy
brendywendy
i know you probably have one to hand, but i dont

so who were these great RW who were lining up to play for us?


Three names that were touted at the time, all of which I think would've been available, interested and an improvement on what we had, are Gera, Kightly and Routledge.


Weren't the only people touting Gera on here? As they do every season for the last 3 years. In which case I'll start touting Quersma every summer and January for a couple of years and then complain when something goes wrong that he was available, interested and an improvement on what we had.


Like getting relegated, mainly cause we created nothing down the wing due to not having one Premiership quality right winger in the club?

If you're telling me Kebe was the best we were looking at, what the fcuk were we looking at. He says himself he's played on the left most the time.

I still cannot believe we went down last season, with seemingly such little fight. That's what gets me. The fcukin make do attitude.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Ian Royal » 29 Jun 2008 21:47

If Kebe was the best we were looking at I'd eat my hat.

Then I'd find Coppell and punch him in the face for being a moron. But seeing as we'll never know and I think that idea is ridiculous I'll leave him alone.

I'm just saying that the only people touting Gera as available and a good buy as far as I can tell were on here.

Brom to Fulham seems a strange choice to me.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by brendywendy » 30 Jun 2008 09:52

Southbank Old Boy
brendywendy
i know you probably have one to hand, but i dont

so who were these great RW who were lining up to play for us?


Three names that were touted at the time, all of which I think would've been available, interested and an improvement on what we had, are Gera, Kightly and Routledge.



that opinion not fact

even if im in agreement.

and we have no idea if we were in anyway attractive to those players

User avatar
SpaceCruiser
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5590
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
Location: Desperately seeking to return home

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by SpaceCruiser » 30 Jun 2008 10:06

Smoking Kills Dancing Doe What I don't get about Kebe and never will.

How was a French lower league left winger, ever going to keep us up?


Typical dick comment from you.

You of course ignore the fact that he was on-loan to a club in the French lower league when we bought him.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Hoop Blah » 30 Jun 2008 10:48

brendywendy
Southbank Old Boy
brendywendy
i know you probably have one to hand, but i dont

so who were these great RW who were lining up to play for us?


Three names that were touted at the time, all of which I think would've been available, interested and an improvement on what we had, are Gera, Kightly and Routledge.



that opinion not fact

even if im in agreement.

and we have no idea if we were in anyway attractive to those players


No idea we'd have been attractive? We were in the Premiership!!!!! Where have you been the last few years....players are drawn to the bright lights of the Premiership like flies round shit.

Considering Gera went from a promoted club to another club who were in the same relegation fight as us, who are based just down the road and have a recent history of being in and around the relegation zone, I think it's a fair conclusion that he'd have been willing to come to Reading....wages permitting of course.

Routledge was desperate to get out of Spurs. He went to Villa probably knowing that he'd be lucky to get in the side. Again, we probably wouldn't have been able to match Villa on wages if it came to a bidding war but he wouldn't have been on extortionate wages at Spurs (I seem to remember Carrick was only on about 13-15k before his move to Utd) so I reckon we could've been competitive.

Kightly would surely have had his head turned by the chance to establish himself as the first choice winger at a Premiership club considering he was playing non-league not so long ago. Wages wouldn't have been a problem, we'd have just had to stump up enough cash to prise him away from Wolves.

I agree we don't know if we were interested in these players, but it seems likely that IF, and thats a big if, we were interested in them we would've had a decent chance of signing them. The arguement that there was nobody around to bring in just doesn't stand up. The 'fact of the matter' is that we decided not to, apart from some left winger with no touch from the French lower leagues.


User avatar
Agent Balti
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1332
Joined: 17 Jan 2008 12:39

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Agent Balti » 01 Jul 2008 09:26

Which if you extrapolate out a bit beyong left wingers, just what kind of players are RFC looking at? What is the criteria that they wish to fulfill, as I'll be buggered if I can work it out these days. The selling policy is simple - "show us the money or beat it", but buying I just can't fathom. It's neither optimistic and bold nor is it a fabulous endictment of our *ahem* scouting system.

Queue Brendy...

Roger the Rabbit
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: 22 May 2008 10:12

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Roger the Rabbit » 01 Jul 2008 09:44

The selling policy is simple - "show us the money or beat it"
------

We haven'd sold many in recent years have we ?

Halford (very good deal !), but beyond that how many meaningful sales have we had ?

Currently we have no idea what 'policy' we'll have as we have nothing beyond tabloid tales to go on.

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7369
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Alan Partridge » 01 Jul 2008 09:59

SpaceCruiser
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe What I don't get about Kebe and never will.

How was a French lower league left winger, ever going to keep us up?


Typical dick comment from you.

You of course ignore the fact that he was on-loan to a club in the French lower league when we bought him.


Of which he never played a single minutes football for.

User avatar
Agent Balti
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1332
Joined: 17 Jan 2008 12:39

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Agent Balti » 01 Jul 2008 10:00

I suppose there's a difference between selling and letting go, which is what we're supremely good at also.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Ian Royal » 01 Jul 2008 19:10

Roger the Rabbit The selling policy is simple - "show us the money or beat it"
------

We haven'd sold many in recent years have we ?

Halford (very good deal !), but beyond that how many meaningful sales have we had ?

Currently we have no idea what 'policy' we'll have as we have nothing beyond tabloid tales to go on.

Hughes and Seol.

Both very good bits of business (bar the leaving us with only a white line on the right wing).

Roger the Rabbit
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: 22 May 2008 10:12

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Roger the Rabbit » 01 Jul 2008 20:45

Ian Royal
Roger the Rabbit The selling policy is simple - "show us the money or beat it"
------

We haven'd sold many in recent years have we ?

Halford (very good deal !), but beyond that how many meaningful sales have we had ?

Currently we have no idea what 'policy' we'll have as we have nothing beyond tabloid tales to go on.

Hughes and Seol.

Both very good bits of business (bar the leaving us with only a white line on the right wing).


We didn't sell Seol, we exchanged him meaning there was no 'showing of the money'

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Ian Royal » 01 Jul 2008 22:31

Roger the Rabbit
Ian Royal
Roger the Rabbit The selling policy is simple - "show us the money or beat it"
------

We haven'd sold many in recent years have we ?

Halford (very good deal !), but beyond that how many meaningful sales have we had ?

Currently we have no idea what 'policy' we'll have as we have nothing beyond tabloid tales to go on.

Hughes and Seol.

Both very good bits of business (bar the leaving us with only a white line on the right wing).


We didn't sell Seol, we exchanged him meaning there was no 'showing of the money'


pedant. We didn't release him or let his contract run out. We gave him to someone else in a trade for something of value. Better value IMO.

They had to "show us the value" of the player coming the other way. If it wasn't good enough, we'd have said get bent.

User avatar
Badger Finger
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1784
Joined: 02 May 2004 18:10
Location: Int'it besseh

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Badger Finger » 02 Jul 2008 10:03

The OS Wrote in Jan Strictly speaking, Liam and Seol wasn't actually a swap deal, both transfers were separate and independent of each other. But the key thing was that neither club was going to sell the other player without the other going in the opposite direction.


Cheer up guys, we'll be alright!

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Wycombe Royal » 16 Jul 2008 16:34

Another rumour that can be closed - he has joined Norwich for £450k plus add-ons.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by brendywendy » 16 Jul 2008 16:39

Agent Balti Which if you extrapolate out a bit beyong left wingers, just what kind of players are RFC looking at? What is the criteria that they wish to fulfill, as I'll be buggered if I can work it out these days. The selling policy is simple - "show us the money or beat it", but buying I just can't fathom. It's neither optimistic and bold nor is it a fabulous endictment of our *ahem* scouting system.

Queue Brendy...


you want me to queue?

Norfolk Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3554
Joined: 30 Apr 2004 16:07
Location: Carrot juice is the elixir of the Gods.

Re: RUMOUR - David Bell

by Norfolk Royal » 16 Jul 2008 17:59

Wycombe Royal Another rumour that can be closed - he has joined Norwich for £450k plus add-ons.


Are you sure? There's nothing running on the Norwich message boards.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 90 guests

It is currently 10 May 2025 03:42