LoyalRoyalFan I agree that Karacan is a fantastic young talent. However, I don't think we should let go of Matejovsky because for me he is a vital part of the team.
LOL
by Big Ern » 21 Jan 2010 19:21
LoyalRoyalFan I agree that Karacan is a fantastic young talent. However, I don't think we should let go of Matejovsky because for me he is a vital part of the team.
by Dirk Gently » 21 Jan 2010 21:48
LoyalRoyalFan I agree that Karacan is a fantastic young talent. However, I don't think we should let go of Matejovsky because for me he is a vital part of the team.
by W&E Royal » 22 Jan 2010 00:28
LoyalRoyalFan I agree that Karacan is a fantastic young talent. However, I don't think we should let go of Matejovsky because for me he is a vital part of the team.
by Royalwaster » 22 Jan 2010 08:15
IdealLoyalRoyalFan Matejovsky has proven he can....
Stop right there!!!
Now excuse me, you say he has proven something? That's exactly what the major problem is, he hasn't proven anything while he has been with us.
There is the vague hope that "one day" he might fulfill his potential "if everyone can learn to understand him", on the other hand the guy is drawing up on 30 and has had a couple of seasons to build up an understanding with his teammates, don't you think it's a bit late to be talking about potential this and that??? Don't you think he would have done it by now if he ever was going to???
It's time to draw the line, the guy has been a failure - EOD.
by Comfortably Numb » 22 Jan 2010 08:44
IdealLoyalRoyalFan Matejovsky has proven he can....
Stop right there!!!
by Elmer Park » 22 Jan 2010 09:39
by Tilehurst Mike » 22 Jan 2010 09:43
by Stranded » 22 Jan 2010 10:04
Tilehurst Mike Never going to happen as matejovsky is currently injured and unlikely to play for at least another month
by brendywendy » 22 Jan 2010 14:39
by Royal_Delight » 22 Jan 2010 14:59
Tilehurst Mike Never going to happen as matejovsky is currently injured and unlikely to play for at least another month
by Wycombe Royal » 22 Jan 2010 15:09
Royal_DelightTilehurst Mike Never going to happen as matejovsky is currently injured and unlikely to play for at least another month
Regarding his injury,can anyone tell me if he was injured during or after the match?
by LoyalRoyalFan » 22 Jan 2010 17:14
IdealLoyalRoyalFan Matejovsky has proven he can....
Stop right there!!!
Now excuse me, you say he has proven something? That's exactly what the major problem is, he hasn't proven anything while he has been with us.
There is the vague hope that "one day" he might fulfill his potential "if everyone can learn to understand him", on the other hand the guy is drawing up on 30 and has had a couple of seasons to build up an understanding with his teammates, don't you think it's a bit late to be talking about potential this and that??? Don't you think he would have done it by now if he ever was going to???
It's time to draw the line, the guy has been a failure - EOD.
by shaka's shorts » 22 Jan 2010 18:01
by Big Ern » 22 Jan 2010 18:15
LoyalRoyalFan Matejovsky is the only player, who can play those intelligent through-balls, which our strikers can't read
by Ian Royal » 22 Jan 2010 22:49
W&E RoyalI find that very insulting.
Sorry Ian, no offence was meant.
by Ian Royal » 22 Jan 2010 22:53
Dirk Gently
Karacan's only had the chance to play that role once or twice, and he's not disappointed either time. Matejovsky has had countless chances and only delivered once or twice.
Don't get me wrong, Matejovsky is our most skillful player - but he doesn't deliver that skill, so he's just not effective. I'd go for a less skillful player who consistently and effectively delivers any day of the week!
by Row Z Royal » 22 Jan 2010 23:00
Ian Royal Thought in the first game of the season that Karacan was wasted in that stupid sit in front of the defence position Rodgers had him. Him and Howard are both good solid all round players and would work together very well in a Coppell 4-4-2 allowing two quality wingers to bomb on and provide for the strikers.
by Ian Royal » 22 Jan 2010 23:26
by W&E Royal » 23 Jan 2010 03:06
Ian RoyalW&E RoyalI find that very insulting.
Sorry Ian, no offence was meant.
No harm done then.![]()
I suppose anyone who considers me a hero must be mad enough to also consider Ideal a hero.
by Ian Royal » 23 Jan 2010 12:38
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 53 guests