The ITK thread sponsered by Friday's Legacy and Big Mike

[TheLawnMowerMan]

Anyone who takes anything too seriously (especially themselves) on HNA? should stop reading it for their own good.

[soggy biscuit]

After the Gylfi-gate fiasco can this be re named the not ITK thread?

[USA_Loyal_Royal]

I don't get why anyone would actually give 0.25 of a shit about any of this.

ITK or NITK what fvcking difference does it make, apart from maybe getting your cock out and having a good vvank over what could/couldn't happen.

Yes I read it. But I don't get absorbed in it. And I especially don't want to murder the person when it doesn't happen.

this x10000000000

[Big Ern]

LOL at Andrew telling Big Ern to "look in the mirror".

Yeah, Big Ern! And you have fleas and fancy Miss Drechsler! You bumface pooper!

It would be so much better if 12 year olds like you and Big Ern actually went to school and learnt something rather than skiving off to make silly posts on here.

Please leave it to the adults.

Oh Andrew.....If you represent an Adult's view that really is quite sad. I think most kids, even retarded ones have a higher IQ than you.

[andrew1957]

LOL at Andrew telling Big Ern to "look in the mirror".

Yeah, Big Ern! And you have fleas and fancy Miss Drechsler! You bumface pooper!

It would be so much better if 12 year olds like you and Big Ern actually went to school and learnt something rather than skiving off to make silly posts on here.

Please leave it to the adults.

Oh Andrew.....If you represent an Adult's view that really is quite sad. I think most kids, even retarded ones have a higher IQ than you.

Bit wrong there - as I am actually qualified as a member of Mensa.

[Royal Bahamas]

Me too. Mensa Int. 164 Cattel Scale.

Unfortunately it doesn't mean I know S--t about Football though.....

[Big Ern]

Bit wrong there - as I am actually qualified as a member of Mensa.

I do not believe that for a minute. If so, add that to the list of the many wrongs in this world or maybe membership now comes from with a coupon inside a packet of cornflakes.

[The Rouge]

Is Dare to Dream ITK - or just quoting from Fans Forum + confidently stating what speculation makes look likely?

[Dare to Dr£am]

Is Dare to Dream ITK - or just quoting from Fans Forum + confidently stating what speculation makes look likely?

Never claimed to be ITK. Didn't go to the fans forum either. Just pick up on things elsehwhere.

[southbank1871]

Mags is ITK now seemingly. All hail the King.

[HoneyRoastHoax]

Is Dare to Dream ITK - or just quoting from Fans Forum + confidently stating what speculation makes look likely?

Never claimed to be ITK. Didn't go to the fans forum either. Just pick up on things from twitter.

[LoyalRoyal22]

Is Dare to Dream ITK - or just quoting from Fans Forum + confidently stating what speculation makes look likely?

Never claimed to be ITK. Didn't go to the fans forum either. Just pick up on things from twitter.

[Dare to Dr£am]

Is Dare to Dream ITK - or just quoting from Fans Forum + confidently stating what speculation makes look likely?

Never claimed to be ITK. Didn't go to the fans forum either. Just pick up on things from twitter.

Well yeah, and any other media outlet available. I've never claimed to be something I'm not. :|

[andrew1957]

Me too. Mensa Int. 164 Cattel Scale.

Wow that is amazing considering the highest possible score on the Cattel scale is 161. You broke the mould.

[bigmike]

Me too. Mensa Int. 164 Cattel Scale.

Wow that is amazing considering the highest possible score on the Cattel scale is 161. You broke the mould.

Maybe they meant the Cattle scale which is a whole different way to measure Bullshit

[Royal Bahamas]

Me too. Mensa Int. 164 Cattel Scale.

Wow that is amazing considering the highest possible score on the Cattel scale is 161. You broke the mould.

Maybe they meant the Cattle scale which is a whole different way to measure Bullshit

Sorry guys, but your knowledge and logic are both faulty, though I do think that there is definite room for a "Cattle Scale" in this forum!

By your logic, the brains capacity for Intelligence stops dead at 161, and thus the eventual demise of Mankind.......Einstein, calculated to be at an IQ (on the Cattel Scale) of 230, would not have been..... Thus, there is no "LIMIT" to the high end of such a scale!
There is one thing that I learned long ago, and that is that some people will willing never believe anything that is opposed to their veiw of life. Given that each of us has/will do things differently than others, is the very aspect of us being individuals. The good thing is that as long as I know that I have done these things, that is all I (and anyone else) ever needs. "Don't be a hater!"

It's a shame that you didn't put the full quote in, ".... though that doesn't mean that you know s--t about football!"

[andrew1957]

Wow that is amazing considering the highest possible score on the Cattel scale is 161. You broke the mould.

Maybe they meant the Cattle scale which is a whole different way to measure Bullshit

Sorry guys, but your knowledge and logic are both faulty, though I do think that there is definite room for a "Cattle Scale" in this forum!

By your logic, the brains capacity for Intelligence stops dead at 161, and thus the eventual demise of Mankind.......Einstein, calculated to be at an IQ (on the Cattel Scale) of 230, would not have been..... Thus, there is no "LIMIT" to the high end of such a scale!
There is one thing that I learned long ago, and that is that some people will willing never believe anything that is opposed to their veiw of life. Given that each of us has/will do things differently than others, is the very aspect of us being individuals. The good thing is that as long as I know that I have done these things, that is all I (and anyone else) ever needs. "Don't be a hater!"

It's a shame that you didn't put the full quote in, ".... though that doesn't mean that you know s--t about football!"

errr......it is Mensa who say the maximum is 161

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j& ... G92wveAGFQ

[Snowball]

I think that 161 score limit has to be meaningless.

Maybe they mean that they don't bother breaking down scores above this point.

Years ago I sat the Mensa test and got 168, so either they have changed the test or changed their rules.


Also if 161 was a score it was impossible to better, that would have to mean perfect answers
for all questions within the time-limit.

From experience I know the tests are designed so that it's extremely difficult to finish each section in the 7 minutes allowed.

I got a 168 (and a 158 where I completely missed a page in error) and I know I was rushing like hell towards the end.

I'm absolutely certain sharper brains than mine on the day could have got 10-20 IQ points more than I got.



Point 3, as it requires 148 to get in (top 2%) and the Standard Deviation is 15 IQ points

65% of the population are 085-115
95% of the population are 070-130
98% of the population are 055-145

Just half a percent score 160+ but that's still a heck of a lot of people (280,000)

Are they really suggesting that 280,000 people are squeezed into a single 1% of IQ?

[Simon's Church]

I once got 169 after missing TWO whole pages by accident.

[Blakey's Right Peg]

at this thread turning into a discussion about Mensa.