by Royal Lady » 20 Aug 2009 20:54
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 20:56
Royal Lady He wouldn't have been on business re Smith, cos Watford haven't accepted a bid from us yet. Unless he drove to Watford to personally hand the bid in.
by Gordons Cumming » 20 Aug 2009 20:57
Sir Dodger Royal Boys. Glad to see that you recognise that SDR is Totally Well Advised Tipster
SDR gives you Real Facts in the Real World. Spot on as usual
Suck a Cigar as you too could be like the Main Mannnnnnnn
by Royal Lady » 20 Aug 2009 21:00
DeathyRoyal Lady Well d'uh - Smith is a given obviously.
You can't count to two then? Hammond is "away on business", his line of work suggests he's trying to bring people in or he's scouting, both even. That might just be the two that Rodgers keeps reiterating that he wants in.
by Terminal Boardom » 20 Aug 2009 21:11
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 21:12
Royal LadyDeathyRoyal Lady Well d'uh - Smith is a given obviously.
You can't count to two then? Hammond is "away on business", his line of work suggests he's trying to bring people in or he's scouting, both even. That might just be the two that Rodgers keeps reiterating that he wants in.
In this quote ^ you alluded that Smith was one of the two. Not backtracking are you Jay?
by Terminal Boardom » 20 Aug 2009 21:19
DeathyRoyal Lady In this quote ^ you alluded that Smith was one of the two. Not backtracking are you Jay?
No I'm not. We all know Rodgers wants Smith, it's a given. If Hammond is away on business, then you would suspect he's chasing target number two of the two more Rodgers wants. Are you still with me? I'm repeating myself here.
by Royal Rother » 20 Aug 2009 21:21
PlatypussRoyal Rother If it hadn't become so obvious that we needed him we may well have got our man for less, but neither Rodgers nor Madejski could afford NOT to get him in the end and Watford knew that so played harder ball than they might otherwise have done.
Fair play to them.
We win, we get our man. (Presumably.)
They win, they get the big fee.
Everyone's happy.
Except Reading FC supporters of course who will look for the big negative.
And if he goes somewhere else?
by Terminal Boardom » 20 Aug 2009 21:36
by rg6royal » 20 Aug 2009 21:47
by winchester_royal » 20 Aug 2009 21:48
rg6royal Right...We're signing him. He'll be on the bench Saturday
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 21:49
winchester_royalrg6royal Right...We're signing him. He'll be on the bench Saturday
Is this speculation or genuine ITK knowledge?
by rg6royal » 20 Aug 2009 21:51
winchester_royalrg6royal Right...We're signing him. He'll be on the bench Saturday
Is this speculation or genuine ITK knowledge?
by winchester_royal » 20 Aug 2009 21:52
rg6royalwinchester_royalrg6royal Right...We're signing him. He'll be on the bench Saturday
Is this speculation or genuine ITK knowledge?
http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/footb ... ommy_smith
Pretty obvious
by Terminal Boardom » 20 Aug 2009 22:02
winchester_royalrg6royalwinchester_royal
Is this speculation or genuine ITK knowledge?
http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/footb ... ommy_smith
Pretty obvious
Read the last couple of pages of this thread and you should see why it's less than obvious atm.
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 22:04
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 22:06
by Super_horns » 20 Aug 2009 22:11
by clauski » 20 Aug 2009 22:51
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 23:04
Super_horns Our club have got what they exactly wanted...a bidding war it seems.
I just hope we don't flap around and accept next week so having even less time to get a replacement.
(That's if Smithy does actually go)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests