by madmickb » 23 Aug 2009 20:32
by Wimb » 23 Aug 2009 20:33
West Stand Flash Level par with Newcastle for club embarrasment lately.
by floyd__streete » 23 Aug 2009 20:35
Wycombe Royal So says Russo. Hardly the most reliabe source....
by Dorset-Knob » 23 Aug 2009 20:39
WimbWest Stand Flash Level par with Newcastle for club embarrasment lately.
You have to be joking right? talk about a mountain out of a molehill. We're four games into the season have played 2 top six teams, have kept two cleans sheets, but yes are misfiring in front of goal.
We've made £11 million odd on 3 players who cost us about 1.5 million combined and we've gained national coverage for our new manager and what he's trying to do for the club.
Yes the Smith affair could have been handled better but Watford won't exactly come out of this looking great
I think thats a far cry from a club who've gone through more managers in 4 years then we have in 20, didn't build relegation clauses into their contracts, got relegated with a multi million pound squad and are still paying thousands of pounds to players who don't give a to55.
by FiNeRaIn » 23 Aug 2009 20:40
by Wycombe Royal » 23 Aug 2009 20:40
floyd__streeteWycombe Royal So says Russo. Hardly the most reliabe source....
Oh so you're accusing the Watford chairman of being a liar now?
More spin than Graeme Swann.
by floyd__streete » 23 Aug 2009 20:41
by Dorset-Knob » 23 Aug 2009 20:42
FiNeRaIn Yeah it won 3-0 and remains unbeaten this season.
by Gus the teenage cow » 23 Aug 2009 21:16
FiNeRaIn LMAO thats a SCATHING attack on RFC- fair play to them. I liked this bit.
"Given that the evidence available to us suggests that Brendan covets the player and Reading have netted circa £11m with the sales of Doyle, Hunt and Bikey - not to mention the huge wage savings that go with that, I have to say I was surprised when they said that they were no longer interested in signing Tommy because of a clause that is commonplace in transfers today."
Basically saying " you have money so don't pretend you don't, stop bothering us with terrible offers". Fair play to that whole article and the way we have gone about things has been embarassing.
by Deathy » 23 Aug 2009 21:25
by Arch » 23 Aug 2009 21:33
Sir Dodger Royal Frankly RFC should just come out officially and say that we are no longer interested in Tommy Smith. He is a good player and we wish him well and wish Jimmy Russo & Watford well for the rest of the season.
In no way should we be crawling to a Hertfordshire pikey who grows lettuce for a living.
Those are the facts and SDR says the deal is offfffffffff and I mean offfffffffffffffff
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 23 Aug 2009 21:35
Royal Lady Deathy - Perhaps Imamateofjovsky knows people involved? Who knows. He does, however, appear to have been spot on and it's a brave man who makes that sort of "opinion" if he doesn't have any insider knowledge.
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 23 Aug 2009 21:38
Kitson12IMAMATEOFJOVSKY He ain't coming said before - fact...if I was Smith id telling Reading to shove it up their arse as well
How do you know? What are you, some kind of all knowing transfer grass? How about you shut up until you actually know anything!
by Sir Dodger Royal » 23 Aug 2009 21:41
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 23 Aug 2009 21:43
Royal Rother Over the last few years it has become apparent to Watford supporters that very little that comes out of the mouth of Mr Russo can be trusted, yet bizarrely Reading FC fans are quite happy to take his rant about how poorly our club has conducted business over Tommy Smith at face value. I guess these people conveniently forget the fact that on more than one occasion recently clubs and their Chairmen have commented on how it has been a pleasure dealing with RFC in transfer matters due to the straightforward and professional way in which we handle them.
I couldn't possibly know but it is far more likely that, in this particular case, Russo moved the goalposts once too often causing us to pull out.
But, curiously, it seems far more satisfying for many to believe that our own club is at fault.
by Super_horns » 23 Aug 2009 21:44
Royal Rother Over the last few years it has become apparent to Watford supporters that very little that comes out of the mouth of Mr Russo can be trusted, at fault.
by clauski » 23 Aug 2009 21:44
eleventh earl of mar Without wanting to attack or defend anyone as I do not know, who on here was actually at any of the meetings and can honestly say they know exactly what was discussed? Why are we to just accept what Watford have had to say is absolutely true?
by Super_horns » 23 Aug 2009 21:45
by 07RFC » 23 Aug 2009 21:46
Wycombe Royalfloyd__streeteWycombe Royal So says Russo. Hardly the most reliabe source....
Oh so you're accusing the Watford chairman of being a liar now?
More spin than Graeme Swann.
No I'm saying he has no idea why we pulled the plug. He is just making assumptions and using the media to try and put RFC down in any way possible because he is still pissed at us for taking his manager. However we are making his job easier.
by Super_horns » 23 Aug 2009 21:47
PlatypussSir Dodger Royal In no way should we be crawling to a Hertfordshire pikey who grows lettuce for a living.
LOLlo @ Russo indeed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests