by Super Si » 11 Sep 2006 12:44
by Chicken Balti Pie » 11 Sep 2006 12:48
Super Si he'll be released at the end of the season, no way is he going to replace kits, doyle, lita or long. the previous young players we have sent out on loan have all been moved on. coppell won't trust him at this level unless he does exceptionally well on loan.. young, mullins, howell, etc..
by RoyalBlue » 11 Sep 2006 13:03
Only one Trevor Morley Good move for Cox - I hope that we dont suffer any more injuries to the forward line however.
by Stranded » 11 Sep 2006 13:05
RoyalBlueOnly one Trevor Morley Good move for Cox - I hope that we dont suffer any more injuries to the forward line however.
Presumably we've got recall clauses in the deal for both him and Golbourne or aren't you allowed to do that anymore?
by Tails » 11 Sep 2006 13:17
Super Si Sorry, Chicken Balti, but I played football with him a number of times and could clearly see that he didn't stand out at all. If you are to become a premiership footballer I think that you would clearly be a lot better than the other kids who just play football up the park.
by BRENTFORD_TILL_DIE » 11 Sep 2006 13:49
by Hoop Blah » 11 Sep 2006 13:49
Chicken Balti PieSuper Si he'll be released at the end of the season, no way is he going to replace kits, doyle, lita or long. the previous young players we have sent out on loan have all been moved on. coppell won't trust him at this level unless he does exceptionally well on loan.. young, mullins, howell, etc..
Now we agree !
West Ham were the first to impliment this kind of policy with the likes of Lampard and Rio going on loan to lower league clubs doing well and establishing themselves upon their return.
Gives younger players a warning of what it is like if you do not make it at the highest level !!!
by MartinRdg » 11 Sep 2006 13:50
Super Si Cox used to go to my school. He never looked like anything special then and I haven't seen anything from him since that would suggest otherwise. Always looks like a boy running around aimlessly amongst men.
Won't ever be good enough and is destined for a career in the non-league.
by Chicken Balti Pie » 11 Sep 2006 14:01
Hoop BlahChicken Balti PieSuper Si he'll be released at the end of the season, no way is he going to replace kits, doyle, lita or long. the previous young players we have sent out on loan have all been moved on. coppell won't trust him at this level unless he does exceptionally well on loan.. young, mullins, howell, etc..
Now we agree !
West Ham were the first to impliment this kind of policy with the likes of Lampard and Rio going on loan to lower league clubs doing well and establishing themselves upon their return.
Gives younger players a warning of what it is like if you do not make it at the highest level !!!
Yeah, ground breaking move that by West Ham to loan young players out to get first team experience....I can't believe nobody had thought of it before!!!
As for Cox, he looks a reasonable prospect but is also a pretty average player. Everything about his game is average, and he looks very much a 'coached' player who rarely puts a foot wrong, but never does the spectacular. With that kind of game he could go on to become anything from a very good player at the top or just be a distinctly average non-league player. Personally I think he'll probably make it as a lower league pro but probably hasn't got enough about him to break through at the top.
As for belittleing Super Si's opinion, just because the club have given him a contract doesn't mean he'll be a success, and the fact he's played with him a number of times probably makes his opinion more valid than most on here.
The loan is a good move though, and I hope it helps Cox to keep on improving as a player and he can become a true first teamer at Reading, it's about time a few made the grade.
by Hoop Blah » 11 Sep 2006 14:02
Chicken Balti Pie Er yes it was at the time. Before that it was just reserve players from a shop window point of view.
by Reading Abbey » 11 Sep 2006 14:02
by Rawlie19 » 11 Sep 2006 14:34
Hoop Blah As for belittleing Super Si's opinion, just because the club have given him a contract doesn't mean he'll be a success, and the fact he's played with him a number of times probably makes his opinion more valid than most on here.
by Hoop Blah » 11 Sep 2006 14:53
Rawlie19Hoop Blah As for belittleing Super Si's opinion, just because the club have given him a contract doesn't mean he'll be a success, and the fact he's played with him a number of times probably makes his opinion more valid than most on here.
He never said he'd played with him. Just that they went to the same school.
by HighburyRoyale » 11 Sep 2006 14:56
by Norfolk Royal » 11 Sep 2006 15:02
by test icicles » 11 Sep 2006 15:44
Super Si Cox used to go to my school. He never looked like anything special then and I haven't seen anything from him since that would suggest otherwise. Always looks like a boy running around aimlessly amongst men.
Won't ever be good enough and is destined for a career in the non-league.
by Forbury Lion » 11 Sep 2006 15:46
Perhaps he's improved with age, some kids do (Shaun Wright Phillips, released by Notts Forest) whilst others lose their shine (Sonny Pike)Super Si Sorry, Chicken Balti, but I played football with him a number of times and could clearly see that he didn't stand out at all. If you are to become a premiership footballer I think that you would clearly be a lot better than the other kids who just play football up the park.
by andyhalls » 11 Sep 2006 16:02
Super Si Cox used to go to my school.
by Chicken Balti Pie » 11 Sep 2006 16:45
Hoop BlahChicken Balti Pie Er yes it was at the time. Before that it was just reserve players from a shop window point of view.
Do you really believe that?
by Hoop Blah » 11 Sep 2006 17:17
Chicken Balti PieHoop BlahChicken Balti Pie Er yes it was at the time. Before that it was just reserve players from a shop window point of view.
Do you really believe that?
Prove me wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests