Tamworth_Royal Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.
by Royalee » 26 Oct 2006 00:25
Tamworth_Royal Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
by MC ROYAL » 26 Oct 2006 00:41
RoyaleeTamworth_Royal Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.
by Royalee » 26 Oct 2006 00:44
MC ROYALRoyaleeTamworth_Royal Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.
I guess you didnt see the game then? Twat.
Lita to start with Doyle.
by alad » 26 Oct 2006 00:46
by MC ROYAL » 26 Oct 2006 00:48
RoyaleeMC ROYALRoyaleeTamworth_Royal Just one question though, Long or Lita for Pompey ?
Long every day of the week. You can't play Portsmouth away with only one striker putting in decent work.
I guess you didnt see the game then? Twat.
Lita to start with Doyle.
I've been to every league game this season. Twat. If you'd been to every game this season (and taking your head out of your a*se in the process of doing so you little prick), you'd see that against Arsenal on Sunday, we'd had far more attacking play than against West Ham, Chelsea and Man Utd put together. The reason for this? Two hardworking strikers are always better than one doing the job of two.
by MC ROYAL » 26 Oct 2006 00:49
alad Lita's finishing this season has been woeful aswell. A sustained spell on the bench will do him good.
by Royalee » 26 Oct 2006 00:49
by MC ROYAL » 26 Oct 2006 00:51
Royalee Lita's workrate has been so poor that Coppell dropped him for a player unproven in the Championship in one of our biggest games of the season on Sunday. I think Coppell knows about it, don't you?
by Im Spartacus » 26 Oct 2006 09:35
by Ian Royal » 26 Oct 2006 09:55
by MartinRdg » 26 Oct 2006 10:24
by 79Royal » 26 Oct 2006 10:32
by Top Flight » 26 Oct 2006 10:57
79Royal For me, I think it's time we went with the 4-5-1 formation, especially away from home.
I'd go with (left to right) Seol, Harper, Sidwell, Oster, Little in midfield, with Doyle up front. If Doyle could hold the ball up enough, I reckon we'd have enough runners from midfiled to cause problems in attack.
by Kitsondinho » 26 Oct 2006 11:01
by Ian Royal » 26 Oct 2006 11:09
Kitsondinho 4-5-1 is madness!!! Do we want to be in the situation we were in the 2nd half on sunday, ie every time we get the ball back we pump it long to doyle who amazingly gets beaten by the two 2 or 3 defends around him. It worked really well though didn't it. Yes we had a whole two isolated chances, but did we ever look like sustaining that pressure? no, because we never had the ball. Its bad enough trying to play Arsenal without kicking the ball to Kolo Toure every 2 mins!
by papereyes » 26 Oct 2006 11:17
by Kitsondinho » 26 Oct 2006 11:20
by Ian Royal » 26 Oct 2006 11:27
Kitsondinho I'm sure it was Royals V Arsenal, I'll check the fixtures . 4-5-1 is a mad idea. Doyle cannot be expected to run the line up front on his own against prem defences. I want to see us continue to play pressing footbal and not run scared of the opp. 4-5-1 is the sort of formation that earns you a boring 0-0 draw. Did we score by playing it yesterday? Did we score against Arsenal? Did Lehman even have to make a save when we changed to it? I think the answer may just be no to all 3.
by Kitsondinho » 26 Oct 2006 11:40
by Hoop Blah » 26 Oct 2006 11:50
Kitsondinho 4-5-1 is madness!!! Do we want to be in the situation we were in the 2nd half on sunday, ie every time we get the ball back we pump it long to doyle who amazingly gets beaten by the two 2 or 3 defends around him. It worked really well though didn't it. Yes we had a whole two isolated chances, but did we ever look like sustaining that pressure? no, because we never had the ball. Its bad enough trying to play Arsenal without kicking the ball to Kolo Toure every 2 mins!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 297 guests