by Skin » 26 Nov 2006 17:13
by Platypuss » 26 Nov 2006 19:21
West Stand ManSkinPlatypussWest Stand Man And there, my lord, rests the case for the prosecution
It was quite blatantly a pisstake.
you would have thought that was obvious to all.
then again irony can just pass the most blinkered people by.
Hmmm, lets see now. 'We don't want Tom Hark played after goals, so lets sing it anyway without the club providing us the lead' Now that's seriously ironic -
by West Stand Man » 01 Dec 2006 08:15
by Nezhen » 04 Dec 2006 22:56
by West Stand Man » 11 Dec 2006 10:29
by Nezhen » 19 Dec 2006 12:31
by Huntley & Palmer » 19 Dec 2006 12:50
by Skin » 19 Dec 2006 14:24
Nezhen Latest on Tom Hark, is that the club have now acknowledged in a letter to me that Tom Hark may have run its course !!! Hurray!!!
'We undertand from letters and comments we have received from a number of supporters over the last few weeks that there is a growing frustration from fans over the use of post-goal music, which has resulted in unduly subduing some goal celebrations. We are actively looking at alternatives to the Tom Hark theme and/or removing it entirely from post goal celebrations in the near future'
The letter goes on to state:
'It has also been noted that spontaneous reactions from the crowd following a goal this season, have at times been interupted by the sheer volume of noise projected through the PA system of the Tom Hart theme. The volume of noise will be monitored over the next few home fixtures to ensure that the music does not unneccesarily impact on supporters celebrations'
'This is a situation we take seriously and whilst we would defend our decision to implement post goal celebration music for previous seasons, we do recognise that it may longer be appropriate for Premership crowds'
I really hope that RFC's words result in actions and we can at last be free to celebrate our goals in the true spirit of the game - spontaneously !!!
At least they replied to my letter !!
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Dec 2006 14:28
Skin wonder what the pro-tom hark MINORITY? will say about that? seems they better get writing to the club to save it. Good luck.
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Dec 2006 14:45
SkinWycombe RoyalSkin wonder what the pro-tom hark MINORITY? will say about that? seems they better get writing to the club to save it. Good luck.
I'm surprised you know how to work a computer if you can't even work out what a minority and a majority are.
And just in case you were wondering, I personally can't give a rats arse as to whether it is played or not.
quickest bite ever?
by Skin » 19 Dec 2006 14:50
Wycombe RoyalSkin wonder what the pro-tom hark MINORITY? will say about that? seems they better get writing to the club to save it. Good luck.
I'm surprised you know how to work a computer if you can't even work out what a minority and a majority are.
And just in case you were wondering, I personally can't give a rats arse as to whether it is played or not.
by Wycombe Royal » 19 Dec 2006 14:59
SkinWycombe RoyalSkin wonder what the pro-tom hark MINORITY? will say about that? seems they better get writing to the club to save it. Good luck.
I'm surprised you know how to work a computer if you can't even work out what a minority and a majority are.
And just in case you were wondering, I personally can't give a rats arse as to whether it is played or not.
Not only did I unassumingly question whether it is the minority (that's what the '?' means Wycombe Royal) but I have to say that for someone who doesn't give a rats arse you certainly seem to have an issue somewhere. Nevermind, I'm enjoying your company.
by Skin » 19 Dec 2006 15:19
Wycombe RoyalSkinWycombe RoyalSkin wonder what the pro-tom hark MINORITY? will say about that? seems they better get writing to the club to save it. Good luck.
I'm surprised you know how to work a computer if you can't even work out what a minority and a majority are.
And just in case you were wondering, I personally can't give a rats arse as to whether it is played or not.
Not only did I unassumingly question whether it is the minority (that's what the '?' means Wycombe Royal) but I have to say that for someone who doesn't give a rats arse you certainly seem to have an issue somewhere. Nevermind, I'm enjoying your company.
Just because I don't care whether it is played or not does not mean that I can't be involved in a discussion about it.
By the way, I see you are still struggling to spot my sarcasm. ( - that is for your benefit )
by who are ya? » 01 Jan 2007 22:25
by zac naloen » 01 Jan 2007 23:37
by AthleticoSpizz » 01 Jan 2007 23:41
by Mrs Butler » 01 Jan 2007 23:46
by zac naloen » 01 Jan 2007 23:49
Mrs Butler probably coz it was done 6 times
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests