by cheeryoleary » 06 Dec 2006 21:49
by jenster81 » 06 Dec 2006 21:55
by RoyalBlue » 06 Dec 2006 21:58
by cheeryoleary » 06 Dec 2006 22:04
RoyalBlue The fact that a professional club has a ladies academy doesn't necessarily make that womens team any good. The very top level of the women's game aside, there are a lot of womens/girls teams that more than compete against those teams that are attached to professional clubs.
by RoyalBlue » 06 Dec 2006 22:07
by jenster81 » 06 Dec 2006 22:09
RoyalBlue My response was aimed at Jenster who implied that the fact that there was a womens team attached to the club would make them better than one that wasn't.
by RoyalBlue » 06 Dec 2006 22:13
jenster81RoyalBlue My response was aimed at Jenster who implied that the fact that there was a womens team attached to the club would make them better than one that wasn't.
no i didn't!!! i've played footy for years and i was just saying it wasn't as good to watch. i then went on to say that the club have a team and that reading ladies play at scours lane etc....
your comment makes no sense....
by Unmanageable Hair » 06 Dec 2006 22:16
cheeryoleary Number 1 daught is 4 years old. Whether they are any good doesn't matter - the fact that they turn out and give little'n hope is all I need.
by cheeryoleary » 06 Dec 2006 22:22
Unmanageable Haircheeryoleary Number 1 daught is 4 years old. Whether they are any good doesn't matter - the fact that they turn out and give little'n hope is all I need.
Hope? Hope for what? That one day she might have a hobby...?
by jenster81 » 06 Dec 2006 22:24
RoyalBluejenster81RoyalBlue My response was aimed at Jenster who implied that the fact that there was a womens team attached to the club would make them better than one that wasn't.
no i didn't!!! i've played footy for years and i was just saying it wasn't as good to watch. i then went on to say that the club have a team and that reading ladies play at scours lane etc....
your comment makes no sense....
You may have played footy for years but if you are saying womens football isn't good to watch you clearly haven't seen much of it!
by cheeryoleary » 06 Dec 2006 22:28
jenster81RoyalBluejenster81RoyalBlue My response was aimed at Jenster who implied that the fact that there was a womens team attached to the club would make them better than one that wasn't.
no i didn't!!! i've played footy for years and i was just saying it wasn't as good to watch. i then went on to say that the club have a team and that reading ladies play at scours lane etc....
your comment makes no sense....
You may have played footy for years but if you are saying womens football isn't good to watch you clearly haven't seen much of it!
oh for goodness sake, it was a sarcastic comment aimed at the fact that i prefer WATCHING blokes football.
I give up - i won't help out in future.
by jenster81 » 06 Dec 2006 22:32
cheeryolearyjenster81RoyalBluejenster81RoyalBlue My response was aimed at Jenster who implied that the fact that there was a womens team attached to the club would make them better than one that wasn't.
no i didn't!!! i've played footy for years and i was just saying it wasn't as good to watch. i then went on to say that the club have a team and that reading ladies play at scours lane etc....
your comment makes no sense....
You may have played footy for years but if you are saying womens football isn't good to watch you clearly haven't seen much of it!
oh for goodness sake, it was a sarcastic comment aimed at the fact that i prefer WATCHING blokes football.
I give up - i won't help out in future.
Fancy a shag?
by RoyalChicagoFC » 06 Dec 2006 22:49
by RoyalBlue » 07 Dec 2006 08:18
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers, windermereROYAL and 191 guests