by Forbury Lion » 06 Jan 2007 23:33
by Arch » 06 Jan 2007 23:40
Finally, a fair and accurate assessment!Forbury Lion http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/fa_cup/6213943.stm
Reading P-P Burnley
Saturday's FA Cup third round tie between Reading and Burnley was postponed because of a waterlogged pitch at the Madejksi Stadium.
The tie will now be played on 9 January with all tickets from the original game valid for Tuesday.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reading: Federici, De la Cruz, Sodje, Ingimarsson, Golbourne, Ki-Hyeon, Oster, Bikey, Convey, Lita, Long.
Subs Not Used: Hahnemann, Hunt, Kitson, Harper, Pearce.
Burnley: Jensen, Thomas, McGreal, Foster, Harley, James O'Connor, Akinbiyi, Hyde, Elliott, Jones, Noel-Williams.
Subs Not Used: Mahon, Garreth O'Connor, McCann, Lafferty, Spicer.
Postponed: Due to waterlogged pitch
Ref: R Styles (Hampshire).
by Woodcote Royal » 07 Jan 2007 00:16
by Row Z Royal » 07 Jan 2007 00:19
by Millsy » 07 Jan 2007 01:20
by Billy The Fish » 07 Jan 2007 08:36
by M4 Junction 11 » 07 Jan 2007 09:03
Billy The Fish this club are still very much non-league with their approach.
by Royal Lady » 07 Jan 2007 09:20
by Gordon Cumming's right ho » 07 Jan 2007 09:24
by PieEater » 07 Jan 2007 09:32
by RIP ELM Park » 07 Jan 2007 09:34
Gordon Cumming's right ho It may be seen as being culpable for a crime but I was thinking this morning that it would be a great gesture of goodwill if RFC was prepared to pay for Burnley's supporters coaches on Tuesday. It would only cost a couple of grand tops....
by Royal Lady » 07 Jan 2007 09:35
by Black Basque & Suspen » 07 Jan 2007 10:21
Gordon Cumming's right ho It may be seen as being culpable for a crime but I was thinking this morning that it would be a great gesture of goodwill if RFC was prepared to pay for Burnley's supporters coaches on Tuesday. It would only cost a couple of grand tops....
by Dirk Gently » 07 Jan 2007 12:16
by shadesrwrf » 07 Jan 2007 12:20
Dirk Gently In fact, if RFC arranged for a hooker to go round and fellate him every morning he'd probably post on his website that she wasn't attractive enough.
by zac naloen » 07 Jan 2007 12:21
More text messages followed telling us the game was now off. What did we get from Reading Football Club? Nothing. After receiving this news our players and staff came out to applaud the travelling support, but still no announcement, and then suddenly the words ‘MATCH ABANDONED’ appeared on the scoreboard behind us. They even got that wrong, the match had been postponed, and not abandoned. I left the stadium and still there had been no announcement other than those two words on the board
by Dirk Gently » 07 Jan 2007 12:23
More text messages followed telling us the game was now off. What did we get from Reading Football Club? Nothing. After receiving this news our players and staff came out to applaud the travelling support, but still no announcement, and then suddenly the words ‘MATCH ABANDONED’ appeared on the scoreboard behind us. They even got that wrong, the match had been postponed, and not abandoned. I left the stadium and still there had been no announcement other than those two words on the board
by Millsy » 07 Jan 2007 12:29
by Dirk Gently » 07 Jan 2007 12:33
2 world wars, 1 world cup I'd be upset if I was him.
How is it that fans in the ground were the last to know? Not professional enough.
by Gordon Cumming's right ho » 07 Jan 2007 12:37
In fact, if RFC arranged for a hooker to go round and fellate him every morning he'd probably post on his website that she wasn't attractive enough.
Users browsing this forum: Jinx, Lower West, Orion1871, Rax, WestYorksRoyal and 182 guests