Back from the game (!)

TFF · by **TFF** » 06 Jan 2007 19:14

Royalee
The 17 Bus what would you have suggested they used to remove the water Royalee?

They could have rolled the water off or pumped it away - Southampton managed to do something to that effect in recent weeks.

meeky_no9 · by **meeky_no9** » 06 Jan 2007 19:15

Warfield Royal · by **Warfield Royal** » 06 Jan 2007 19:23

Young Warfield Royal is in the ball person team and when he stood in the South Stand goal mouth today the water was over the toes of his shoes.

DelBoyRodders · by **DelBoyRodders** » 06 Jan 2007 19:26

Warfield Royal Young Warfield Royal is in the ball person team and when he stood in the South Stand goal mouth today the water was over the toes of his shoes.

But Royalee won't believe that.

royals pete · by **royals pete** » 06 Jan 2007 19:27

Doesn't help when Mick Gooding added his comments on BBCRB at about 3.20 that 'if they'd waited till now, pitch is playable'.

Thats all I wanted to hear having arrived at the ground SOAKED .

The commentary team should let it be

M4 Junction 11 · by **M4 Junction 11** » 06 Jan 2007 19:30

Nicky Shorey Save water with me and turn off the tap when you brush your teeth.

On Page 40 of the matchday programme. Is there still a water shortage?

alad · by **alad** » 06 Jan 2007 19:31

If the game had taken place today the pitch would have been fcuked for months to come.

Avon Royal · by **Avon Royal** » 06 Jan 2007 19:34

alad If the game had taken place today the pitch would have been fcuked for months to come.

Which it will be anyway if the plastic paddies play tomorrow.

alad · by **alad** » 06 Jan 2007 19:34

Their game has been called off.

Vicky Pollard · by **Vicky Pollard** » 06 Jan 2007 19:39

pitch inspection 9am. Theyll probably call it off then though

Avon Royal · by **Avon Royal** » 06 Jan 2007 19:42

Vicky Pollard pitch inspection 9am. Theyll probably call it off then though

The pitch inspection is by the ref. He only has to decide if it is safe for play, he won't give two hoots if the pitch will be torn up!

dantheloyalroyal · by **dantheloyalroyal** » 06 Jan 2007 20:27

On the whole it was pretty good. If they were to make apperences, Convey and Kitson have another few days off. It also seemed like Ingamarsson and others looked set to play, so it gives them some more time to recover from christmas fixture pile up, despite the fact they now have a mid-week game to play.

I certainly wouldn't want to be a Burnley player at the moment, and so I am quite happy with how the events have unfolded!

Nezhen · by **Nezhen** » 06 Jan 2007 20:57

Unbelievable thread !!!

I cannot believe that there are really people out there who for one minute think that the game could or should have gone ahead today. Really stratching my head to understand the wisdom of these tw*ts ????

That pitch was totally unplayable today, should not be played on tomorrow and dependant on the weather between now and Tuesday, it may not even be wise to hold the replay so soon.

The pitch does have undersoil drainage, but like almost all other Premership pitches, it quite rightly cannot cope with the amount of rain that fell on the pitch from early this morning, which was then exacerbated by almost an hour of relentless rain from just after 2pm until after 3pm.

Only a lunatic would have deemed that surface playable today. The fact that the rain stopped by 3.15pm is irrelevant. The damage had already been done by then. What do these people want ???? serious injuries to our players or something ?

Unbelievable - hang your heads in shame !!

AthleticoSpizz · by **AthleticoSpizz** » 06 Jan 2007 21:05

Unlike NYD against Leicester

at least the fans weren't fleeced of their admission fee this time

A tough call for the Burnley fans tho'

davis69 · by **davis69** » 06 Jan 2007 21:30

i know the pitch was bad but you might aswell play the match and get it over with they used to play in worse conditions then that. Its time we kick london irish out that doesnt help the pitch

royals pete · by **royals pete** » 06 Jan 2007 21:36

As I said earlier about Mick Goodings radio comments. Definitely not the right thing to say.

Pitch NOT playable. Who wants to see OUR players slipping and sliding about in a mudbath. Waste of time and effort. And not good to watch. Few laughs maybe, but then......

Anyone else ship a few sock fulls of water ???????

Platypuss · by **Platypuss** » 06 Jan 2007 23:29

Schards#2 Drainage must be very poor from that pitch, it's not like it hammered down all day.

Isn't the pitch actually below ground surface level?

The sub-soil drainage will be able to cope with a fair bit, but after a while it will just get overwhelmed.

Royal Lady · by **Royal Lady** » 07 Jan 2007 09:48

Was the pitch really worse than at West Ham away earlier in the season? I seriously thought that game would be off or abandoned too.

The 17 Bus · by **The 17 Bus** » 07 Jan 2007 10:14

Royal Lady Was the pitch really worse than at West Ham away earlier in the season? I seriously thought that game would be off or abandoned too.

Pardew out!!

Schards#2 · by **Schards#2** » 07 Jan 2007 10:28

royals pete As I said earlier about Mick Goodings radio comments. Definitely not the right thing to say.

Pitch NOT playable. Who wants to see OUR players slipping and sliding about in a mudbath. Waste of time and effort. And not good to watch. Few laughs maybe, but then......

Anyone else ship a few sock fulls of water ???????

Well it's not like the club treats the tournament as anything other than a big joke, so why not?

Back from the game (!)

Who is online