by Nezhen » 08 Jan 2007 21:48
by John Madejski's Wallet » 09 Jan 2007 00:06
SpaceCruiser Oh Lord save me, they actually think we don't own the stadium.
What is company A? I think they made that one up, they seem desperate to think that we are also tenants.
by bb0118 » 09 Jan 2007 00:39
John Madejski's WalletSpaceCruiser Oh Lord save me, they actually think we don't own the stadium.
What is company A? I think they made that one up, they seem desperate to think that we are also tenants.
I always actually thought Mr Mad owned the stadium and we were just tenants!!
by SpaceCruiser » 09 Jan 2007 10:27
John Madejski's WalletSpaceCruiser Oh Lord save me, they actually think we don't own the stadium.
What is company A? I think they made that one up, they seem desperate to think that we are also tenants.
I always actually thought Mr Mad owned the stadium and we were just tenants!!
by Rawlie19 » 09 Jan 2007 10:39
SpaceCruiserJohn Madejski's WalletSpaceCruiser Oh Lord save me, they actually think we don't own the stadium.
What is company A? I think they made that one up, they seem desperate to think that we are also tenants.
I always actually thought Mr Mad owned the stadium and we were just tenants!!
Mr Mad owns Reading FC. Therefore Reading FC owns the stadium. When Mr Mad sells Reading FC, I think the Madejski Stadium will be part of the package.
And all this primacy of tenure bollocks, surely the owners of the stadium have every right to decide whether a rugby game can go ahead or not.
by Platypuss » 09 Jan 2007 10:41
by Stranded » 09 Jan 2007 10:43
SpaceCruiserJohn Madejski's WalletSpaceCruiser Oh Lord save me, they actually think we don't own the stadium.
What is company A? I think they made that one up, they seem desperate to think that we are also tenants.
I always actually thought Mr Mad owned the stadium and we were just tenants!!
Mr Mad owns Reading FC. Therefore Reading FC owns the stadium. When Mr Mad sells Reading FC, I think the Madejski Stadium will be part of the package.
And all this primacy of tenure bollocks, surely the owners of the stadium have every right to decide whether a rugby game can go ahead or not.
by AndyRFC » 09 Jan 2007 10:57
by M4 Junction 11 » 09 Jan 2007 10:58
Platypuss I believe the "main" company is Reading Football Club (Holdings) Ltd
by andyhalls » 09 Jan 2007 11:18
by MartinRdg » 09 Jan 2007 11:29
by Huntley & Palmer » 09 Jan 2007 11:32
by M4 Junction 11 » 09 Jan 2007 11:36
by Platypuss » 09 Jan 2007 11:40
by zac naloen » 09 Jan 2007 11:42
by SpaceCruiser » 09 Jan 2007 11:42
M4 Junction 11 They would also be in trouble with the planning authorities as they say the stadium is owned by Reading FC
by zac naloen » 09 Jan 2007 11:45
Platypuss Someone must be able to do a quick Companies House search and nail this properly.
by Archie's penalty » 09 Jan 2007 11:47
by West Stand Man » 09 Jan 2007 11:49
SpaceCruiserJohn Madejski's WalletSpaceCruiser Oh Lord save me, they actually think we don't own the stadium.
What is company A? I think they made that one up, they seem desperate to think that we are also tenants.
I always actually thought Mr Mad owned the stadium and we were just tenants!!
Mr Mad owns Reading FC. Therefore Reading FC owns the stadium. When Mr Mad sells Reading FC, I think the Madejski Stadium will be part of the package.
And all this primacy of tenure bollocks, surely the owners of the stadium have every right to decide whether a rugby game can go ahead or not.
by M4 Junction 11 » 09 Jan 2007 11:53
SpaceCruiserM4 Junction 11 They would also be in trouble with the planning authorities as they say the stadium is owned by Reading FC
Who's "They"?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 199 guests