Did Warnock do these bad bad things on Saturday?

[Royal Rother]

Well did he?

[Alan Partridge]

I don't care.

What's happened, happened. We've got Birmingham on Saturday.

[handbags_harris]

I don't care.

What's happened, happened. We've got Birmingham on Saturday.

Seconded. The truth will out when it's ready. Otherwise who gives a shit?

[papereyes]

Its in the hands of the FA.

I can see both him and Downes getting touchline bans. Sadly ( ), only one of the pair has a suspended sentence for doing exactly the same thing as he's alleged to have done on Saturday ...

[mahoj002]

what are you doing?

[SpaceCruiser]

I don't care.

What's happened, happened. We've got Birmingham on Saturday.

Seconded. The truth will out when it's ready. Otherwise who gives a shit?

Mr Royal "I'm so intelligent that I had to re-do the poll" Rother obviously does.

[Royal Rother]

Yes I actually do find it interesting.

[Jaques Francais]

As a personal aquaintance of Neil Warnock, I can confirm he did all the viles things we suspect him of. He is also guilty of some war crimes, which I won't go into here, as they are off topic.

[SpaceCruiser]

As a personal aquaintance of Neil Warnock, I can confirm he did all the viles things we suspect him of. He is also guilty of some war crimes, which I won't go into here, as they are off topic.

I'm sorry but that's just complete and utter bullshit.

As one of the most relentlessly polite and fair-minded posters on here, I demand that you submit to my overwhelming important opinion. After all, you are riff raff and I can't be seen to be wrong here.

[RoyalBlue]

Whatever he said, his actions once again were inflammatory. If they were merely the verbals and sarcastic applause directed at Hunt, the FA would regard that as unacceptable in the case of most managers. However, they seem to make exceptions for the likes of Warnock and Moronho.

[Ian Royal]

As a personal aquaintance of Neil Warnock, I can confirm he did all the viles things we suspect him of. He is also guilty of some war crimes, which I won't go into here, as they are off topic.

I'm sorry but that's just complete and utter bullshit.

As one of the most relentlessly polite and fair-minded posters on here, I demand that you submit to my overwhelming important opinion. After all, you are riff raff and I can't be seen to be wrong here.

to be fair spacey you are riff raff, and do come across as thick as two short planks sometime.

[SpaceCruiser]

to be fair spacey you are riff raff,

Just because I prefer lager to ale......

[Royal Rother]

to be fair spacey you are riff raff,

Just because I prefer lager to ale......

What? You are now officially beneath contempt.

[Cookie]

did he send Gillespie on with the instruction to bash Hunt?

Don't think so - he would have put a hard-man on if he's wanted that to happen.

[MC ROYAL]

Was pretty clearly trying to get Hunt's leg broken. Says he was saying Sidwell's challenge was the worst one when doing his action except the ref was looking the other way and he appears to be saying "break his legs Monty" to Montgomerie.

[Tails]

Nice one Royal Rother the crusader for a balanced and fair view no
provacation for other board members is there?

My two cents...

Personally, having looked over the video thats being doing the rounds, there is clear evidence that Warnock aggravated the situation inappropriatly when he provoked (see video) Hunt, thus should get the touchline ban i expect him to get. Wally will get his touchline ban for further escalating the affair by striding across the technical area.

Gillespie will get his ban for the initial offence, and an additional one for what took place after the sending off.

Hunt will not get bugger all (apart from the ill founded bad press) because, there IS NO EVIDENCE that he did anything untoward. Anything else is immaterial in this instance and thus need not be contemplated. Hate or Love Warnock...hate or love Wally, hate or love Hunt.

[Arch]

I'm guessing Gillespie and Wally will get the book thrown at them. Warnock only if an official has some evidence we don't know about. He might get done for the clapping, but probably not. ("The first time anyone's been banned for applauding an opposition player.") The problem for Wally is that they'll make use of the video showing Warnock standing looking a bit disgruntled for a few seconds before turning to pick up his water bottle and Wally barrelling in and shoving him. It looks unprovoked.

[Royal Rother]

Nice one Royal Rother the crusader for a balanced and fair view no provacation for other board members is there?

Provocation? I don't know what you're talking about.

Surely sanity and a balanced view has a place on this forum without being seen as provoking the masses?

Anyway, interesting poll result so far. The number of voters who think Warnock is innocent of all charges seems somewhat higher than those who've contributed that opinion to the threads.

[From Despair To Where?]

Nice attempt to split the "Warnock is a real villain" vote 3 ways though. I make it an almost two thirds majority against Warnock at the moment.

Where's the "Warnock unecessarily agrivated an already volatile situation further" option?

[Royal Rother]

There is no ambiguity in the options at all.

What it actually illustrates is that, despite the apparently massive weight of opinion, 50% think he did not instruct his players to break the legs of any Reading player.

And that 50% think he did not send Gillespie on with the intention of bashing Hunt.

Very telling I think.