Warnock not charged!!!!!

mikey0406
Member
Posts: 378
Joined: 05 Dec 2005 17:00

Warnock not charged!!!!!

by mikey0406 » 24 Jan 2007 15:01

Just seen a news report on SSN, and the latest to come out of the FA is that both clubs will be charged for failure to control their players, Wally Downess will be charged for adopting an aggressive behaviour and guess what......... Warnock has got off Scott Free!

how is that possible as it was his stamping action that kicked everything off on the touchline.... catalyst for chaos!

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

by Arch » 24 Jan 2007 15:04

Lack of evidence, I'd guess.

Pants of Primus
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 11:49
Location: Elm Park - Where is everyone?

by Pants of Primus » 24 Jan 2007 15:05

i don't like the man, but he was clearly innocent of any charges.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2007 15:05

well the ref will have confirmed his story is correct and Downes mis-read the whole thing.

I predict a minor gloat from RR, which to be fair is probably deserved.

If Warnock hadn't been on a 4 match suspended ban we may have seen some action, but 4+ matches would have been overkill given what the ref must have reported.

User avatar
Winchester Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1749
Joined: 15 Mar 2005 14:42
Location: GEEK

by Winchester Royal » 24 Jan 2007 15:05

Why did Warnock decide to bring up the Sidwell tackle immediately after Gillespie had been sent off?


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2007 15:06

first chance to talk to the ref and to compare to his player who was just sent off. lack of consistancy.

simple

User avatar
Stooper
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1153
Joined: 27 Jun 2005 02:07

by Stooper » 24 Jan 2007 15:08

What should he be charged for?

Walking away from threatening behaviour? :lol:

User avatar
SpaceCruiser
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5590
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
Location: Desperately seeking to return home

Re: Warnock not charged!!!!!

by SpaceCruiser » 24 Jan 2007 15:09

mikey0406 Wally Downess will be charged for adopting an aggressive behaviour and guess what......... Warnock has got off Scott Free!


So the stamping action was not adopting an aggressive behaviour? That does not make sense.

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16850
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: Warnock not charged!!!!!

by TBM » 24 Jan 2007 15:10

SpaceCruiser
mikey0406 Wally Downess will be charged for adopting an aggressive behaviour and guess what......... Warnock has got off Scott Free!


So the stamping action was not adopting an aggressive behaviour? That does not make sense.


:roll:


Far from the royal crowds
Member
Posts: 84
Joined: 11 Feb 2006 14:47
Location: Lost in Australia

by Far from the royal crowds » 24 Jan 2007 15:10

http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary ... SheffU.htm

Straight from the source. Warnock's been "reminded of his responsibilities"...

mikey0406
Member
Posts: 378
Joined: 05 Dec 2005 17:00

by mikey0406 » 24 Jan 2007 15:11

but if warnock didnt do the stamping action nothing would of kicked off! is it just him being stupid doing it at a wrong time?

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Warnock not charged!!!!!

by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2007 15:12

SpaceCruiser
mikey0406 Wally Downess will be charged for adopting an aggressive behaviour and guess what......... Warnock has got off Scott Free!


So the stamping action was not adopting an aggressive behaviour? That does not make sense.


I expected you to not be able to understand it. You're blind to anything that doesn't fit with your perception of Reading FC being the holy messiah of football and all who oppose it being the antichrist in need of being burnt at the stake.

The ref heard what Warnock said and knows he was not doing anything wrong. Inadvisable and inflamatory at the time maybe, hence being sent to the stands to calm the situation.

Maybe Warnock did charge up Gillespie, maybe he was encouraging his players to go in hard or worse, but there is no evidence for it so he can't be charged.

readingbedding
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4396
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 21:10
Location: cutting them all away for four runs

by readingbedding » 24 Jan 2007 15:12

Winchester Royal Why did Warnock decide to bring up the Sidwell tackle immediately after Gillespie had been sent off?


Heat of the moment, you sent off my player, and Sidwell's was the worst tackle blah, blah.

I guessed he'd have no charges to face because I saw him mouth 'Sidwell's tackle' on the highlights.


User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

by southbank1871 » 24 Jan 2007 15:12

Can't really see the problem with this. Warnock may be a bit of a tool, but I can't honestly see that he did too much wrong here.

ohagerup
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 23 Dec 2004 17:05
Location: Bergen, Norway

by ohagerup » 24 Jan 2007 15:14

As expected. Nothing indicates misbehaviour from Warnock on this occasion. Of course you might argue that neither of the referees heard what he said, but most likely it seems that the referee has backed Warnock's story of that incident.

Then he just has the sarchastic handclapping to answer for, which is - of course - nothing.

Gordons Cumming
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:52
Location: All Good Things Come To An End

by Gordons Cumming » 24 Jan 2007 15:15

southbank1871 Can't really see the problem with this. Warnock may be a bit of a tool, but I can't honestly see that he did too much wrong here.


He is a little ugly though..............which I find a little offensive.

User avatar
M4 Junction 11
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1718
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 22:36
Location: Land That Time Forgot

by M4 Junction 11 » 24 Jan 2007 15:16

Ian Royal well the ref will have confirmed his story is correct and Downes mis-read the whole thing.

Not just Downes but also Gillespie who took Colin's suggestion to "Do Him" literally. It looks like Colin will escape punishment but at the expense of dumping on Gillespie who must now feel let down and a prize fool!

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

by Arch » 24 Jan 2007 15:16

mikey0406 but if warnock didnt do the stamping action nothing would of kicked off! is it just him being stupid doing it at a wrong time?
So he stamped and yelled, and then a significant amount of time later (he'd had time to quiet down, ruminate a while and then pick up his water bottle for a drink) a coach from the opposition bench charges over and pushes him. I can;t see how he can be charged for causing the fracas.

User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

by southbank1871 » 24 Jan 2007 15:20

M4 Junction 11
Ian Royal well the ref will have confirmed his story is correct and Downes mis-read the whole thing.

Not just Downes but also Gillespie who took Colin's suggestion to "Do Him" literally. It looks like Colin will escape punishment but at the expense of dumping on Gillespie who must now feel let down and a prize fool!


You of course are just guessing this, you have no evidence that Warnock instructed Gillespie to 'do' anyone

79Royal
Member
Posts: 614
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 10:42

by 79Royal » 24 Jan 2007 15:24

The right outcome really. Warnock is a tool, but he wasn't the one who walked out of his techinical area and pushed over a memeber of the opposing team's staff!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bcubed, Google [Bot] and 299 guests

It is currently 02 Dec 2024 20:23