by londinium » 31 Jan 2007 13:33
by Forbury Lion » 31 Jan 2007 13:34
Sidwell signing a record contract? What as Kevin Girdlers replacement?Big Ernjenster81Mr Angry A pretty semsible purchase for, what in January, is the price you pay.
It seems to suggest that Sonks' injury is maybe worse than so far hinted at by the club, and, as PP said, if we have 4 quality central defenders to choose from where is the problem? We then have the luxury of being able to rest players as and when appropriate. This will also apply when Doyle is fit and Kitson fully match fit for the forwards.
Halford is one for the future, which just leaves 1 other bit of business to tie up........and one that MAY explain the Chairmans' comments of record signing.
Sidwell.
I heard alot about that last night at the game and if it's true i will be surprised that he played last night. never know.
I think Mr Angry is intimating that Sidwell will sign a record contract with the club in terms of pay.
by Only one Trevor Morley » 31 Jan 2007 13:39
by Barry the bird boggler » 31 Jan 2007 13:45
by Platypuss » 31 Jan 2007 13:50
Barry the bird boggler What's his disciplinary record like, for some reason I seem to have the impression he likes an early bath once or twice a season.....
by Only one Trevor Morley » 31 Jan 2007 13:51
PlatypussBarry the bird boggler What's his disciplinary record like, for some reason I seem to have the impression he likes an early bath once or twice a season.....
No reds this season. one last, two the season before.
Reds are an occupational hazard for normal centre backs.
by Maguire » 31 Jan 2007 14:03
by Boston Royal » 31 Jan 2007 14:05
Coppell's Right Footed 11 People continuing to question this is ridiculous? why are people making out 800k to be a lot of money has no one realised that next season if you finished bottom of the prem you would be guaranteed at least 66.6 million in tv rights and premiership placing? and you lot are moaning about 800k for a centre back who is captain of the best defence in the championship? christ almighty.
Hes 31 yes but even till the end of the season, if he gets us a few wins then whats everyone moaning about
by readingbedding » 31 Jan 2007 14:18
by 'lista » 31 Jan 2007 14:19
Maguire Duberry's a grass.
He'll be pushing up daisies before the end of February.
by Coppelled Streets » 31 Jan 2007 14:20
londinium At first I thought it was terrible news and couldn't see the logic in it..he obviously isn't a player for long term and we are almost safe from relegation for there would be no need to panic buy as a few more points will surely be achieved.
Then I actually thought about it... is Sonko's injury likely to keep him out for a bit longer than anticipated and if so there is a lot of weight put on Ivar's shoulders. Bikey has had a couple of good games at centre back and damp right awful one last night and from what I have seen Sodje at this stage is not upto the grade.
I think Coppell is inwardly thinking (and would of course never say in public) that we actually have a really good shot at getting a European place. Ivar need a rest (looked out of sorts at times last night) and also an experienced partner to play along side him. Duberry fits the bill perfectly, in form, experienced and from what I have seen and read too a great professional.
Good purchase Coppell... spot on... yet again
by YoungRoyal » 31 Jan 2007 15:23
by Stranded » 31 Jan 2007 15:23
YoungRoyal Does anyone think we will sign someone else as well as Duberry today?
by southbank1871 » 31 Jan 2007 15:26
StrandedYoungRoyal Does anyone think we will sign someone else as well as Duberry today?
Yes or possibly no.
by Stranded » 31 Jan 2007 15:28
southbank1871StrandedYoungRoyal Does anyone think we will sign someone else as well as Duberry today?
Yes or possibly no.
I reckon we probably will, but then again we might not.
by 'lista » 31 Jan 2007 15:38
by Big Ern » 31 Jan 2007 15:39
Strandedsouthbank1871StrandedYoungRoyal Does anyone think we will sign someone else as well as Duberry today?
Yes or possibly no.
I reckon we probably will, but then again we might not.
But if we don't, I reckon we won't - but if we do, we probably will.
by M Brook » 31 Jan 2007 15:41
Stranded But if we don't, I reckon we won't - but if we do, we probably will.
by TFF » 31 Jan 2007 15:42
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Vision and 145 guests