by Millsy »
03 Feb 2007 02:36
The
discussion on Wikipedia. Making my blood simmer - what's the bet that that's Holt himself?
oxf*rd of a player?
Can't take someone condemning our player?
Not when our player did nothing f*cking wrong. And especially not when these dangerous lies are leading to death threats, you common c*ckney gloryhunters. I'm really beginning to detest Chelsea and am beginning to lose all sympathy and delight sadistically at their misfortune. They deserve it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This journalist was critical of the collision between Stephen Hunt and Petr ÄŒech on 14 October 2006, believing it to be deliberate intent to hurt ÄŒech on Hunt's behalf. He has written subsequent columns condemning Hunt whenever any incident occurs involving the player, referring back to the October incident. This has led to edits to this article from both the Chelsea perspective - documenting the criticism, but leading to an article with POV - and from the other side, generally changing the article's POV, with some vandalism.
I don't believe that references to this incident and the further press articles belong in a biographical article and so removed them. I'm a Reading fan so am not happy with the constant references by Holt back to Hunt, but biographical articles, particularly of living persons, must be NPOV. - Kruador 12:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
and I don't even know who Oliver Holt is...I just want the continuing POV vandalism of the page to stop. Dzubint 12:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Typical Reading fans. Can't stand that someone sees their oxf*rd of a player for what he really is
i think maybe Kruador's bias is showing through. There aren't any Chelsea fans adding malicious stuff, only
Reading fans who can't take someone condemning their player. read the edit history for proof of this fact. Some of these people should have been banned from Wikipedia but they didn't even get a warning.86.133.160.72 00:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC) "