by G Force 1871 » 24 Feb 2007 16:58
noiseG Force 1871Royal Rother I am not a Lita basher. When a player has played poorly I say so, when they play well I say so. You will find equally as many complimentary posts from me regarding Lita as negative ones.
Many of the negative ones were all in one short space of time when I tried to explain to a bunch of dimwits just why I thought he had been poor in the early part of the season.
Ok, i'll accept that, it just seems to me that certain players can play crap and nothing gets said by anyone, including you. Then Lita has an underaverage game and a bunch of dimwits start moaning that he's greedy lazy and falls over too much.
and thug. yawn yawn yawn
by Platypuss » 24 Feb 2007 16:59
by Archie's penalty » 24 Feb 2007 17:00
Chaney didnt deserve to lose, dominated the entire second half
by Archie's penalty » 24 Feb 2007 17:01
Platypuss It does speaks volumes, however, when some choose to criticise Lita, but say nothing about Long.
by G Force 1871 » 24 Feb 2007 17:02
Platypuss It does speaks volumes, however, when some choose to criticise Lita, but say nothing about Long.
by Royal Rother » 24 Feb 2007 17:02
by Gordons Cumming » 24 Feb 2007 17:03
Archie's penaltyChaney didnt deserve to lose, dominated the entire second half
Agreed they were sh*t scared of us by the end - we had about 60 % possession second half...
by Royal Rother » 24 Feb 2007 17:03
Platypuss It does speaks volumes, however, when some choose to criticise Lita, but say nothing about Long.
by G Force 1871 » 24 Feb 2007 17:03
Royal Rother Well, I thought we were terrific going forward in the 2nd half, playing some great flowing football. With the chances created we should have won comfortably, but Viduka and Yakubu were just a class ahead of our strikers unfortunately.
Good game, if a bit frustrating not to get something out of it.
by Platypuss » 24 Feb 2007 17:05
Royal RotherPlatypuss It does speaks volumes, however, when some choose to criticise Lita, but say nothing about Long.
What volumes does it speak, and who criticised Lita and not Long?
by Adrian's Fool » 24 Feb 2007 17:05
by Chaney » 24 Feb 2007 17:06
Gordons CummingArchie's penaltyChaney didnt deserve to lose, dominated the entire second half
Agreed they were sh*t scared of us by the end - we had about 60 % possession second half...
It's goals that count................................
by Coppelled Streets » 24 Feb 2007 17:07
PlatypussRoyal RotherPlatypuss It does speaks volumes, however, when some choose to criticise Lita, but say nothing about Long.
What volumes does it speak, and who criticised Lita and not Long?
Willzroyal.
by Royal Rother » 24 Feb 2007 17:09
PlatypussRoyal RotherPlatypuss It does speaks volumes, however, when some choose to criticise Lita, but say nothing about Long.
What volumes does it speak, and who criticised Lita and not Long?
Willzroyal.
by Royal Rother » 24 Feb 2007 17:12
Harold Save your breath - discussing it wont change the result.
by Arch » 24 Feb 2007 17:12
by Gordons Cumming » 24 Feb 2007 17:13
ChaneyGordons CummingArchie's penaltyChaney didnt deserve to lose, dominated the entire second half
Agreed they were sh*t scared of us by the end - we had about 60 % possession second half...
It's goals that count................................
no shit einstein
by Archie's penalty » 24 Feb 2007 17:13
Royal RotherHarold Save your breath - discussing it wont change the result.
Righto. I guess this piece of beautiful wisdom means that Hobnob must be closed down tonight. I mean, what IS the point in discussing a game after it's finished?
You are SUCH a thick pillock Harold.
Users browsing this forum: karbota, royals6719 and 254 guests