East Stand SteSchards#2 I think it's simplistic to say that because our understrength team only lost narrowly then it follows that our full strength side would have won.
Man Utd's aim was to win whilst using as little of their resources as they had to. If it was 0-0 at half time, the second half would not have been dominated by Reading and, had it gone to extra time, we would have been facing a fresh Rooney, Ronaldo and Scoles for half an hour.
The team we put out did superbly well and we should just be happy with that. Our squad has all had some experience at the highest level under the greatest pressure and, as and when we have to call on them, they will come in better prepared than they otherwise would have been. A profitable cup venture all round but any chance of winning it ended on the day of the fifth round draw.
i agree with you to a point. to say we 'WOULD' have won is simplistic, but the fact remains if we'd have played a stronger side we wouldnt have been 3-0 down after such a short time....but yes i take your point, if it was 0-0 at HT man u wouldve been more pressing for the goal....you say about extra time though, im not so sure i agree there tho, i think if we hadve made it 3-3 and taken it to extra time i feel the momentum wouldve been with the royals and we wouldve gone on to record a famous victory!!........we could talk all day about 'ifs' and 'buts' tho, but the fact remains that royals were very unlucky not to pull it back at the end and i feel if leroys goal came 5 minutes earlier we would have scored again.
Given that 3 of the back 5 are currently are first choice defence - it's very simplistic to say that it wouldn't have happened if Murty and Hahnemann had played.