by Scarface » 05 Mar 2007 08:31
by John Madejski's Wallet » 05 Mar 2007 10:21
readingbeddingJohn Madejski's WalletMC ROYALwillz_royalbryn for harper and its a goodunMC ROYAL Bring in Oster for Hunt and Bryn for Sidwell.
Harps is our most important player, he makes the team tick.
does he hell.
He runs around, doesn't tackle and backs-off midfield runners.
He's had a few good games this season but the arguments about Harps are the same as they've always been. And I guess will never get resolved till we see what life is like without him
some see it that "The team only plays well when Harps plays well"
others (me included) see it that "Harper only plays well when the team's playing well"
You didn't go to newcastle.
by brendywendy » 05 Mar 2007 11:21
by West Stand Man » 05 Mar 2007 12:39
Royalee Agree again readingbedding, I thought the only players who had decent games yesterday were Hahnmenann, Bikey and Lita besides the subs. I thought Hunt and Harper in particular were the worst, however, and they were both poor up at Boro as well so I'd drop them in favour of Gunnarsson and Oster.
by Royalee » 05 Mar 2007 12:41
West Stand ManRoyalee Agree again readingbedding, I thought the only players who had decent games yesterday were Hahnmenann, Bikey and Lita besides the subs. I thought Hunt and Harper in particular were the worst, however, and they were both poor up at Boro as well so I'd drop them in favour of Gunnarsson and Oster.
Interesting that the press seem to think that Harper was pretty ok on Saturday.
by Gordons Cumming » 05 Mar 2007 12:45
Royalee No, I couldn't care less if a bomb went off in Fleet Street.
by fool » 05 Mar 2007 12:47
by skipper » 05 Mar 2007 12:52
fool Completely agree with the calls for Oster and Gunnarsson to have a first team start from recent performances. I believe both would add an extra dimension to the team in the remainming games this season.
by 79Royal » 05 Mar 2007 12:54
by bcubed » 05 Mar 2007 13:26
roll over boltonhoven well wonders will never cease, I actually agree with Royalee - Gunnarsson for Harper and Oster for Hunt. Also I thought Kitson was dreadful yesterday, could easily have got booked before he did, plus looked slow and petulant. Doyle or Long would be more effective on that showing.
But the strangest thing of all yesterday was Murty running striaght down the tunnel at the end, rather than saluting the fans. What was all that about?
The most predictable thing was of course (apart from that Lehmann would have a go at everyone, including his own defenders) that the underground would be up the creek.
by West Stand Man » 05 Mar 2007 13:32
RoyaleeWest Stand ManRoyalee Agree again readingbedding, I thought the only players who had decent games yesterday were Hahnmenann, Bikey and Lita besides the subs. I thought Hunt and Harper in particular were the worst, however, and they were both poor up at Boro as well so I'd drop them in favour of Gunnarsson and Oster.
Interesting that the press seem to think that Harper was pretty ok on Saturday.
The press also think our players are murderers, we disrespect the FA Cup, our chairman is a poser, our manager is boring and our players are rubbish. Do I care what the press think? No, I couldn't care less if a bomb went off in Fleet Street.
by readingbedding » 05 Mar 2007 13:47
bcubedroll over boltonhoven well wonders will never cease, I actually agree with Royalee - Gunnarsson for Harper and Oster for Hunt. Also I thought Kitson was dreadful yesterday, could easily have got booked before he did, plus looked slow and petulant. Doyle or Long would be more effective on that showing.
But the strangest thing of all yesterday was Murty running striaght down the tunnel at the end, rather than saluting the fans. What was all that about?
The most predictable thing was of course (apart from that Lehmann would have a go at everyone, including his own defenders) that the underground would be up the creek.
Kitson looked very slow, in thought and deed. I am yet to be convinced that he is premiership quality. He hasn't had a great deal of opportunity I know but I think Doyle and Long hold the ball up better and certainly are sharper around the field.
by bcubed » 05 Mar 2007 13:58
readingbeddingbcubedroll over boltonhoven well wonders will never cease, I actually agree with Royalee - Gunnarsson for Harper and Oster for Hunt. Also I thought Kitson was dreadful yesterday, could easily have got booked before he did, plus looked slow and petulant. Doyle or Long would be more effective on that showing.
But the strangest thing of all yesterday was Murty running striaght down the tunnel at the end, rather than saluting the fans. What was all that about?
The most predictable thing was of course (apart from that Lehmann would have a go at everyone, including his own defenders) that the underground would be up the creek.
Kitson looked very slow, in thought and deed. I am yet to be convinced that he is premiership quality. He hasn't had a great deal of opportunity I know but I think Doyle and Long hold the ball up better and certainly are sharper around the field.
You weren't at the Villa home game or Man Utd away in the Cup then.
The one two with Sidwell was class and he worked really hard at Old Trafford.
He's only just come back from a long layoff.
by Royalee » 05 Mar 2007 14:00
West Stand ManRoyaleeWest Stand ManRoyalee Agree again readingbedding, I thought the only players who had decent games yesterday were Hahnmenann, Bikey and Lita besides the subs. I thought Hunt and Harper in particular were the worst, however, and they were both poor up at Boro as well so I'd drop them in favour of Gunnarsson and Oster.
Interesting that the press seem to think that Harper was pretty ok on Saturday.
The press also think our players are murderers, we disrespect the FA Cup, our chairman is a poser, our manager is boring and our players are rubbish. Do I care what the press think? No, I couldn't care less if a bomb went off in Fleet Street.
I think it is just a bit unfair to tar the whole of the UK press with the same brush due to one journalist.
Not that we ever expect you to have any consideration for fact or another person's opinion.
by aaronrfc » 05 Mar 2007 14:16
79Royal Hunt is better defensively than Oster, which is why I believe Coppell started with him on Saturday.
Harper is an attacking midfielder playing a defensive role. Put him in the attacking role and you'll get the best out of him.
There isn't much to choose between Hunt, Oster, Harper, Gunnarsson, Sidwell and Little. Any of the six could make the first team at the moment. I'm happy with whatever combination SC chooses, but I would say that none of the midfielders that played in the last three games have been stood out more than any others.
by Woodcote Royal » 05 Mar 2007 18:06
Scarface I agree with most posts, Oster and Gunner should come in for Hunt and Harper.
Just because Hunt played well over Christmas is no reason to keep him in the side. Players get tired and lose form, we have a decent squad, so Coppell has the luxury of being able to drop/rest players.
by firstdivision » 05 Mar 2007 21:43
by Coppell's Right Footed 11 » 06 Mar 2007 02:32
firstdivision Bryn for me adds a bit of steel in the mid field, and is one of the few players we have who can reliably score from set pieces.
Would like to see him start in place of harper for pompey with sidwell, Hunt and Oster left and right with Little on for Oster with 30 mins to go if we need to shake em up a bit.
But then what do I know, I am a keyboard warrior football fan
by 2.8 lita injection » 02 Jun 2007 18:07
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 187 guests