by Beigemobile » 08 Mar 2007 08:40
by Royal With Cheese » 08 Mar 2007 08:48
strap Shouldn't you be revising for your GCSE's?
by boycey » 08 Mar 2007 09:03
by Ooo Trevor Morley » 08 Mar 2007 09:16
boycey Is he "all that" .
you been watching too much American TV sister .
by a royal called morty » 08 Mar 2007 11:29
loyal1 is doyle as good as he is made out to be. imo he dosent do much in any of the games i have seen him play.ok he scored some goals this year but he was just about the only one hitting the net at the time. am i the only one tothink this?
by londinium » 08 Mar 2007 11:48
by HighburyRoyale » 08 Mar 2007 11:54
Rhys The RoyalDon Finch I agree with the original poster, Doyle doesn't cut it for me either...... wait a minute.......sorry, thought he was talking about Oster
Who would you rather have in your team at the moment...Oster or Seol?
Oster is the answer btw.
by doylefan » 08 Mar 2007 12:04
by brendywendy » 08 Mar 2007 12:07
HighburyRoyaleRhys The RoyalDon Finch I agree with the original poster, Doyle doesn't cut it for me either...... wait a minute.......sorry, thought he was talking about Oster
Who would you rather have in your team at the moment...Oster or Seol?
Oster is the answer btw.
Little and Hunt
Little and Convey
Little on his own
Little and Cox
Little and Henry
Anyone bar Seol or Oster.
by 3/9/1994 » 08 Mar 2007 12:26
loyal1 is doyle as good as he is made out to be. imo he dosent do much in any of the games i have seen him play.ok he scored some goals this year but he was just about the only one hitting the net at the time. am i the only one tothink this?
by Ooo Trevor Morley » 08 Mar 2007 12:36
by londinium » 08 Mar 2007 12:37
3/9/1994loyal1 is doyle as good as he is made out to be. imo he dosent do much in any of the games i have seen him play.ok he scored some goals this year but he was just about the only one hitting the net at the time. am i the only one tothink this?
Are we talking about our Kevin Doyle or the lump at Whatfor Lloyd Doyley?
by Tilehurst End » 08 Mar 2007 12:45
by londinium » 08 Mar 2007 12:56
Tilehurst End The sort of attributes you would generally look for in a striker are pace, strength, workrate, creativity, low injury proneness, good in the air, use of both feet, control/first touch and in SC's case, character.
Any of those boxes KD doesn't tick?
by londinium » 08 Mar 2007 12:57
Tilehurst End The sort of attributes you would generally look for in a striker are pace, strength, workrate, creativity, low injury proneness, good in the air, use of both feet, control/first touch and in SC's case, character.
Any of those boxes KD doesn't tick?
by Tilehurst End » 08 Mar 2007 13:16
londiniumTilehurst End The sort of attributes you would generally look for in a striker are pace, strength, workrate, creativity, low injury proneness, good in the air, use of both feet, control/first touch and in SC's case, character.
Any of those boxes KD doesn't tick?
There is one major box that I think you missed out Tilehurt. The 'shooting ability/eye for goal' box. You can have all the rest but without that ability you are fairly worthless.
by Starfish » 08 Mar 2007 13:19
LimpBiscuit Don't worry about the predictable responses, loyal1. You've made an observation, a different opinion. I think you're wrong, but I defend your right to express that opinion anyway.
LimpBisquit Those of you tempted to give an answer that begins with V should hang your heads in shame and NEVER EVER watch another football match....ever.
by brendywendy » 08 Mar 2007 14:34
StarfishLimpBiscuit Don't worry about the predictable responses, loyal1. You've made an observation, a different opinion. I think you're wrong, but I defend your right to express that opinion anyway.
But on another thread ...LimpBisquit Those of you tempted to give an answer that begins with V should hang your heads in shame and NEVER EVER watch another football match....ever.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 182 guests