by Stranded » 19 Mar 2007 16:20
by Behindu » 19 Mar 2007 16:29
by papereyes » 19 Mar 2007 16:48
It would have definitely been alot easier to beat Boro and Watford that it will be to get results at Bolton, Spurs, Blackburn and at home to Newcastle and Liverpool.
by Katie Marsden » 19 Mar 2007 17:07
by Behindu » 19 Mar 2007 17:14
by Katie Marsden » 19 Mar 2007 18:01
Behindu Your point is entirely theoretical though.
Coppell picks his teams and I don't especially think his selections have been responsible for defeats.
His approach has paid huge dividends because it has enabled us to develop a squad that has seen us cope with major injuries this season and last.
IF we had beaten Man Utd (huge if) then you cannot claim we would have won the cup - who knows how the draw would have panned out !
Coppell also makes his decisions without the benefit of hindsight. As he himself has pointed out his selections have hardly been 'weak' sides and even his cup team has been packed with experienced internationals and plenty of first teamers.
And if accusations of 'fishing' are to be avoided don't you need to build an arguement rather than just fling accusations of cock ups around ?
papereyes Hindsight United is the best team the world has ever seen.
by Stranded » 19 Mar 2007 18:06
by papereyes » 19 Mar 2007 18:13
papereyes Hindsight United is the best team the world has ever seen.
Stick to AE.
by Victor Meldrew » 19 Mar 2007 18:16
by Katie Marsden » 19 Mar 2007 18:27
papereyespapereyes Hindsight United is the best team the world has ever seen.
Stick to AE.
Just because you don't like an argument ...
papereyes Hindsight United is the best team the world has ever seen.
by papereyes » 19 Mar 2007 18:44
Katie Marsdenpapereyespapereyes Hindsight United is the best team the world has ever seen.
Stick to AE.
Just because you don't like an argument ...
Care to break down your arguement?
papereyes Hindsight United is the best team the world has ever seen.
I tried but I'm having some trouble. It seems to be some sort of sarcastic comment trying to be funny. What am I missing? Please explain your 'arguement'
by Katie Marsden » 19 Mar 2007 18:51
by Behindu » 19 Mar 2007 19:18
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998 and 280 guests