by readingbedding » 22 Mar 2007 12:08
by zac naloen » 22 Mar 2007 12:13
readingbedding I don't think I have ever booed a Reading player ever.
Doesn't do any good whatsoever.
by Sir Rodney Effing » 22 Mar 2007 12:22
by Tinrib » 22 Mar 2007 12:23
by zac naloen » 22 Mar 2007 12:23
Rodneyme Using the work analogy, If an employee is underperforming he gets a warning. He doesn't get a pat on the back and an applause around the office.
Right?
Nearly right... but nor do you also shout out around the office "Christ almighty, you're absolutely f---ing sh1t at your job, you useless cretin". As others have pointed out, constant booing won't encourage players to improve - if your boss told you that you were crap, and your workmates (the fans in this analogy) kept saying the same sort of thing, would it make you want to improve? You may think about leaving. I'd imagine your workrate would drop. At the same time though, football is highly emotional, it's not easy to stop moaning and booing when you see someone underperforming. Perhaps we should all watch croquet instead.
by readingbedding » 22 Mar 2007 12:26
Windymiller I suspect not being played made him realise he needed to work harder not booing.
He didn't respond positively to booing whilst on the pitch, so therefore it achieved nothing apart from a detrimental effect on his spirit.
by philM » 22 Mar 2007 12:28
readingbedding I don't think I have ever booed a Reading player ever.
Doesn't do any good whatsoever.
by Yorkshire Royal » 22 Mar 2007 12:30
Top Flight Didn't Brian Clough always tell players that they were Sh*t?
He kept peoples feet on the ground, he made sure people didn't get complacent and think they could stop trying and get away with it?
Seol has clearly been complacent......... Coppell manages in a very similar way as Cloughie but probably delivers the messsage in a nicer way.
But, there is nothing wrong with telling a player that they are not performing. The only way fans can collectively tell a player that they are not happy with his performance is by collectively making a booing noise. It was never mean't in a nasty way. It was just a message that we're not happy with that performance and he must try harder next time.
Fans are fickle. Of course they are. If Seol works hard and plays well next time out, he will be the hero of the East Stand!
So what is everyone's problem? There is nothing wrong with showing your upset at a performance!
Top Flight What do you know about Human Nature?
by Stranded » 22 Mar 2007 12:31
by Yorkshire Royal » 22 Mar 2007 12:35
Stranded Can someone point out to me in Seol's comments where he states that it's the fan's booing that have made him realise he's not put the effort in or been good enough?
by RoyalBlue » 22 Mar 2007 13:12
SpaceCruiserTop Flight So to all those muppets who said booing was so wrong. Well it appears to have put the rocket up Seol's ars* that he clearly needed.
Who says that these words were a result of your moronic behaviour, muppet?
I imagine it's the fact that Glen Little starting ahead of him that gave him the "rocket up his arse" as you so nicely put it.
What a twat you are.
by Top Flight » 22 Mar 2007 13:59
by Yorkshire Royal » 22 Mar 2007 14:16
by Top Flight » 22 Mar 2007 14:26
Yorkshire Royal I'm sorry Mr Flight but you are a first class idiot!
Plastic.. funny I can't remember booing on own players back in 95 on the South Bank.
If the team is poor, then boo (losing to Wimbledon 3-0 on boxing day for example). Boo the opposition..
That's pantomine.. Singling out a Reading player and booing him is just daft...
by Yorkshire Royal » 22 Mar 2007 14:32
by Stranded » 22 Mar 2007 14:32
by Seal » 22 Mar 2007 14:38
by Top Flight » 22 Mar 2007 14:39
by SpaceCruiser » 22 Mar 2007 14:50
Top Flight When will people realise that booing is pantomime?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Dirk Gently, Royals and Racers, windermereROYAL and 232 guests