by Royal Lady » 10 Apr 2007 12:23
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Apr 2007 12:26
Schards#2Wycombe RoyalSchards#2 but it's just a plain fact.
No, it's an opinion. What your "best team" is isn't a fact.
Doyle - 2 goals in 13 appearances.
Kitson - 1 goal in 10 appearances.
Those are facts.
It is a fact that we didn't play our best team in any of the games I mentioned and i'm sure there isn't a single fan, player or club official that would argue that we did.
by Adrian's Fool » 10 Apr 2007 12:26
Royal Lady And as I said, if players are complaining of being "too tired" cos they played 2 games in 3 days after a rest of a couple of weeks, there's something radically wrong somewhere. I'm glad you would have accepted that as an excuse if we were fighting against relegation and played with the same players and rested the others. In any case, shouldn't Ivar be "too tired" - hasn't he played practically if not EVERY league game this season?
by Stranded » 10 Apr 2007 12:26
by Vision » 10 Apr 2007 12:26
Schards#2VisionHuntley & PalmerHoop Blah Personally I think we're coasting a little now which I think is dangerous and bad form for those who are paying to watch a side almost going through the motions.
Nail on the head for me there, I am considering abandoning the two remaining away trips even if they cost me money. I'm not putting aside an entire day to travel to the North West to see that sort of performance. I was thinking to myself after the game that I now know what it is like to watch Citeh or Boro week in week out, it was quite depressing
I still can't see any evidence , from the players, in terms of effort and committment that suggest we are coasting. As I've said we lack a bit of quality and composure (particularly when Little doesn't play) but the effort and endeavour to win the game was always there.
On at least 2 occasions in the 2nd half last night we had so many players in the opposition penalty area that we were actually taking the ball of the heads of our own players.
To take the argument to extremes, if Coppell chose to play me up front and not sub me for the entire game, I would give 100% but it could be argued that the club were not trying 100% to win the game.
by Skin » 10 Apr 2007 12:34
by Royal Lady » 10 Apr 2007 12:36
by Schards#2 » 10 Apr 2007 12:37
Skin I can't be bothered to read 7 pages of what mostly appears to be fickle fans who are pissed off because we didn't win last night.
Some of the comments on here and the Leroy thread and the Sidwell thread are nothing short of a joke.
If you think your team don't try or individuals don't deserve your support then why are you bothering supporting them? You obviously know more than SC, and must know the players personally to know how they feel and what they think?
Since when did we start expecting to win every game and play like international superstars week in week out?
by Huntley & Palmer » 10 Apr 2007 12:37
Skin I can't be bothered to read 7 pages of what mostly appears to be fickle fans who are pissed off because we didn't win last night.
Some of the comments on here and the Leroy thread and the Sidwell thread are nothing short of a joke.
If you think your team don't try or individuals don't deserve your support then why are you bothering supporting them? You obviously know more than SC, and must know the players personally to know how they feel and what they think?
Since when did we start expecting to win every game and play like international superstars week in week out?
by brendywendy » 10 Apr 2007 12:52
by Royal Lady » 10 Apr 2007 12:58
You brought up the bit about them possibly being too tired - so please don't try and turn it around, Frimmers stylee.Adrian's Fool arggh. as I've already said, who's to say that our so-called "best players" weren't too tired to play yesterday? how on earth do YOU know that they were our "best" players on the day? What about repercussions for the rest of the season/ next season - don't they matter?
by Royal Lady » 10 Apr 2007 12:59
Where did he say that?brendywendy youd stop going to away matches full stop, becuase we played long up front last night?
by Adrian's Fool » 10 Apr 2007 12:59
Royal LadyYou brought up the bit about them possibly being too tired - so please don't try and turn it around, Frimmers stylee.Adrian's Fool arggh. as I've already said, who's to say that our so-called "best players" weren't too tired to play yesterday? how on earth do YOU know that they were our "best" players on the day? What about repercussions for the rest of the season/ next season - don't they matter?
by Royal Lady » 10 Apr 2007 13:02
Fair enough. But my point still stands that if part of the reason for "resting" some players was because they were "too tired" after playing 2 games in 3 days, after an extended break, then there seriously is something radically wrong with their fitness is there not?Adrian's FoolRoyal LadyYou brought up the bit about them possibly being too tired - so please don't try and turn it around, Frimmers stylee.Adrian's Fool arggh. as I've already said, who's to say that our so-called "best players" weren't too tired to play yesterday? how on earth do YOU know that they were our "best" players on the day? What about repercussions for the rest of the season/ next season - don't they matter?
I think you'll find the objection was to the "complaining" part rather than the "too tired" part.
by Adrian's Fool » 10 Apr 2007 13:05
Royal LadyFair enough. But my point still stands that if part of the reason for "resting" some players was because they were "too tired" after playing 2 games in 3 days, after an extended break, then there seriously is something radically wrong with their fitness is there not?Adrian's FoolRoyal LadyYou brought up the bit about them possibly being too tired - so please don't try and turn it around, Frimmers stylee.Adrian's Fool arggh. as I've already said, who's to say that our so-called "best players" weren't too tired to play yesterday? how on earth do YOU know that they were our "best" players on the day? What about repercussions for the rest of the season/ next season - don't they matter?
I think you'll find the objection was to the "complaining" part rather than the "too tired" part.
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Apr 2007 13:05
Royal LadyFair enough. But my point still stands that if part of the reason for "resting" some players was because they were "too tired" after playing 2 games in 3 days, after an extended break, then there seriously is something radically wrong with their fitness is there not?Adrian's FoolRoyal LadyYou brought up the bit about them possibly being too tired - so please don't try and turn it around, Frimmers stylee.Adrian's Fool arggh. as I've already said, who's to say that our so-called "best players" weren't too tired to play yesterday? how on earth do YOU know that they were our "best" players on the day? What about repercussions for the rest of the season/ next season - don't they matter?
I think you'll find the objection was to the "complaining" part rather than the "too tired" part.
by Royal Lady » 10 Apr 2007 13:06
by Stranded » 10 Apr 2007 13:06
Royal LadyFair enough. But my point still stands that if part of the reason for "resting" some players was because they were "too tired" after playing 2 games in 3 days, after an extended break, then there seriously is something radically wrong with their fitness is there not?Adrian's FoolRoyal LadyYou brought up the bit about them possibly being too tired - so please don't try and turn it around, Frimmers stylee.Adrian's Fool arggh. as I've already said, who's to say that our so-called "best players" weren't too tired to play yesterday? how on earth do YOU know that they were our "best" players on the day? What about repercussions for the rest of the season/ next season - don't they matter?
I think you'll find the objection was to the "complaining" part rather than the "too tired" part.
by 11.30 from paddington » 10 Apr 2007 13:07
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Apr 2007 13:08
Royal Lady Ivar did.
Users browsing this forum: Mr Angry and 303 guests